Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge? Click Here
No Bookmarks Exist.
All right, Well, good evening. Welcome to the Holiday City Planning Commission on February 20th, 2024. Tonight in attendance we 00:00:01
have all commissioners except for Commissioner Prince, who gave regrets. She was only going to be able to join via Skype and we do 00:00:07
not have that set up to do so for her. 00:00:14
So she'll just have to yell at us later if we didn't get everything she wanted. 00:00:20
Hashed out. We also have our legal counsel and city staff Kerry Marsh with us. 00:00:24
And with that we have one item on the agenda, which is a continued public hearing item for the text amendment regarding accessory 00:00:31
dwelling units. But before we jump into all the fun and games with that, I have asked Commissioner Gong if she will read our 00:00:37
opening statement for any members of the public. 00:00:43
The City of Holiday Planning Commission is a volunteer citizen board whose function is to review land use plans and other special 00:00:54
studies, make recommendations to the City Council on proposed zoning map and ordinance changes, and approve conditional uses and 00:01:01
subdivisions. The Planning Commission does not initiate land use applications, rather acts on applications as they're submitted. 00:01:07
Commissioners do not meet with applicants except at publicly noticed meetings. 00:01:14
Commissioners attempt to visit each property on the agenda where the location. 00:01:22
The nature of the neighborhood, existing structures and uses related to the proposed change are noted. 00:01:26
Decisions are based on observations, recommendations from the professional planning staff. 00:01:32
The cities in our city's general plan, zoning ordinance and other reports. 00:01:36
By all verbal and written comments and by evidence submitted, all of which are part of the public record. 00:01:41
Thank you very much, Commissioner. 00:01:46
All right. And with that. 00:01:49
Carrie, if you will, just give us a brief overview and maybe a shout out since our last meeting. 00:01:52
The highlighted changes in the text amendment that we should be aware of, which by my recollection should have addressed three of 00:01:59
those things I sent out in the e-mail that we hopefully have figured out now. 00:02:04
Yes. So updated staff report kind of overviewed some of those changes that we discussed last time. And specifically we went over 00:02:10
ownership requirements. The Planning Commission wanted to see specific definitions for immediate family. So that's included in the 00:02:16
new language. 00:02:22
The language currently has a 10,000 square foot lot size and minimum. 00:02:30
There is an addition on there for corner lots and lots that have double frontage as they have two St. accesses. 00:02:37
Some of those details may need to be ironed out a little more with setbacks, because corner lots are a little bit more unique on 00:02:46
setbacks. 00:02:50
Other changes that were made. 00:02:55
Let's see. 00:02:59
Going through my list here. 00:03:02
Because we haven't gone into the conversion of existing accessory buildings. That's our later discussion. 00:03:06
Corner lots, double frontage, 10,000. Oh, and then the height is the other thing that we're looking at. The new proposed language 00:03:13
has graduated height set at six feet high for on the property line and then 45° over. For primary structures this is 8 feet and 00:03:20
then 45 over, so that does. 00:03:27
Create a lower profile for. 00:03:36
For external ad use, we did set the set back to a 10 foot minimum and then required to be larger according to the chart that's in 00:03:40
our current code for larger properties. 00:03:46
I believe that there is all of the changes that are on there. You can see the changes in the draft text. It's in the blue 00:03:54
underlines. 00:03:59
And the red is crossed out. Forward changes. 00:04:05
I think there are some changes in the red as well. Oh. 00:04:11
Oh, we added the dwelling unit occupancy as well into the code. So that's consistent through our code is occupancy is any number 00:04:16
of persons related by blood, marriage, adoption. So that just addresses the occupancy of units itself. 00:04:22
But ownership of the. 00:04:30
Is addressed in #4. 00:04:33
Lines 20 through 27 in the text. 00:04:37
Height All of the height was pulled from our existing code on accessory buildings. 00:04:43
With the graduated height envelope, specifically the change to. 00:04:50
6 feet is on line 81. 00:04:56
And then your minimum setbacks are on line 43 or 73 and 74. 00:05:00
I think that's everything. Are there any questions that the commissioners have for me before? 00:05:07
Well, I was, since we're working through this kind of a checklist specific type of order, unless any commissioners have any 00:05:13
objection, I figured maybe we'd start with any public comments so they don't have to sit through the next hour of discussion 00:05:20
waiting to to offer what they might have from the public. And then maybe we can move into ironing out some of those details later. 00:05:27
Does anyone have any concerns with doing that format tonight? 00:05:34
OK. So we'll have you sit down. Thank you very much. And with that, this is a continued public hearing. So we will invite any 00:05:42
members of the public that wish to come up and give feedback or input on this text amendment. We would ask that you keep that to 3 00:05:48
minutes or less. And when you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record. And with that, if anyone 00:05:54
would like to come up and make comment, we'll start those now. 00:06:00
All right. 00:06:10
Ron Hilton, 2394 Murray Holiday Rd. 00:06:15
I already sent an e-mail, so hopefully you saw that it was a fairly technical point. 00:06:21
Regarding. 00:06:29
The zones in which Adus should be allowed according to the state law. 00:06:31
I don't need to go into that if you if you saw that. 00:06:41
I don't think we've seen it. Was this sent at a prior time or did you send this today? I sent it a couple days ago. Was it on 00:06:45
Friday? 00:06:49
Actually, I think I sent it Sunday. On Sunday, yeah, so it didn't get added in with the holiday, but if you. 00:06:54
Want to just address your points on that? Sure, it's very brief. 00:07:02
OK. 00:07:25
So the. 00:07:27
The ordinance, as I implied, isn't entirely compliant with the state law. So reading the state law here, this is. 00:07:29
Section 10, nine A 5:30. 00:07:37
Internal accessory dwelling units in any area zoned primarily for residential use. 00:07:40
Hey, the use of an internal accessory dwelling unit is a permitted use. 00:07:47
B. Except as provided in subsections 3 and 4, skipping down to subsection 4. 00:07:53
A municipality may require that an internal accessory dwelling unit be designed in a manner that does not change the appearance of 00:07:59
the primary dwelling as a single family dwelling. 00:08:04
And then skipping down to. 00:08:10
The municipality may prohibit the creation of an internal accessory dwelling unit if the lot containing the primary dwelling unit 00:08:12
is 6000 square feet or less in size. 00:08:18
And so the point I want to get from that. 00:08:24
There is no requirement that the dwelling unit be in a single family zone. 00:08:29
It's only required that it be part of a single family detached. 00:08:34
Primary dwelling unit. 00:08:39
And that the lot be at least 6000 square feet, so the multifamily zones. 00:08:41
In holiday do allow for single family homes. 00:08:47
R28R210 RM all have a section that says you could have a single family home. 00:08:51
And so as long as the lot is at least 6000 square. 00:08:59
Then you know the according to the state law that should you know an Adu should be allowed an internal Adu. And so the change I 00:09:03
suggest is just less than one sentence. It's just in the very first paragraph of the. 00:09:11
Of the statute that we're reviewing tonight where it says. 00:09:19
Existing or new construction of accessory dwelling units are permitted in all single family residential zones R1 Fr one Fr 2.5 Fr 00:09:24
20 and then the part I would add is and single family dwellings in multifamily residential zones R2 RM on lots at least 6000 00:09:31
square feet in size. 00:09:38
That's the only thing I would add, but that would bring it into full conformity with the state law. 00:09:45
So that was really my only comment. 00:09:50
Thank you. Thank you, Ron. Appreciate that. And before we take another public comment on that, I'll just ask real quick. 00:09:53
Carrie, is that something that? 00:10:03
You have any insight on? 00:10:05
As far as requirement. 00:10:07
Council I do 13.04040 holiday city code. 00:10:09
Carrie, can you pull that up? 00:10:16
13.04 dot 04. 00:10:26
Detach straight within or detach. 00:11:00
So the section that Mister Hilton was referring to is internal ad use, which are allowed in every. 00:11:04
Zone by state code. 00:11:11
This is more this particular section is focusing on accessory dwelling units which are exterior to the home, not attached. 00:11:14
And not a part of the main res. 00:11:23
Primary residence. 00:11:26
So at least that's the intent. 00:11:28
Yeah. So I think what Mr. Hilton is saying is on. 00:11:31
Within our existing code for accessory dwelling units. 00:11:36
Just cleaning up the language while we are in there to. 00:11:39
Clarify that it's any single family dwelling. 00:11:44
Within any residential zone. 00:11:48
Instead of limiting to the. 00:11:50
Those specific Z. 00:11:52
But in the multi family, are we saying that, is that the intent? Do we really want in a multi family but if it's a single family 00:11:55
home to allow for an accessory dwelling unit? 00:11:59
If it's a signal I'm asking, I'm not telling. 00:12:04
But it'd be internal, not external in that language. Internal. Well, you can do internal, right? I mean that's that's kind of a 00:12:08
given. Yeah. Our code just says spelled out specifically R1, Fr one, Fr, 2.5 and FR20. So if we just clarify, take out those 00:12:15
zones, it's just a single family dwelling in a residential zone. 00:12:22
And then that would correct with the. 00:12:30
Yeah, so then that clears up the doesn't create a conflict. I don't see that that creates a conflict. 00:12:33
I can note that change good technical call out from the public. Thank you. And with that we'll we'll resume from any other members 00:12:40
of the public that wish make a comment tonight. 00:12:44
Well, I'm David Seaman. I'm talking about property, 4996 Mormont Circle. 00:12:51
I've got some paper for each of you. Can I hand that? 00:12:56
You. 00:13:02
Paper to hand out about your property site plan? Yeah. A plot map of what I've proposed to do. I'm this is my wife, Mindy. We we 00:13:03
hang on just a minute. You're not on the agenda. 00:13:07
So are you. We, In order for you to present before the Planning Commission, we have to. You know, state code requires you be a 00:13:12
part of the agenda. Oh, and you're not. So if this is the only thing we're accepting coming on right now, is the public hearing 00:13:17
related to that accessory dwelling unit, public amendments? 00:13:22
That's what I'm here to talk about. 00:13:28
Is an accessory growing. I've talked to her several times and. 00:13:30
So you're talking about the specific text of the. 00:13:33
Code here or or a site plan the size of the lot. 00:13:36
If it's a waste of time to have the paper, I won't, but I, my wife and I, I don't. I don't illegal anything, but we saved up a 00:13:40
long time and bought 2 properties in the last three to four years in holiday. 00:13:45
With the intent of putting Adus on them. And during my due diligence period, I came in and talked to the planners and they said, 00:13:50
yeah, that seems sort of reasonable. And apparently in the last four years that's changed. 00:13:54
And now we have these properties that I came in to apply and for an Adu on this has a. 00:13:59
It's called the Double St. Front potentially, and it's a perfectly everything meets code, everything meets the height 00:14:06
restrictions. The what? Everything else except for the lot requirement of I think it's one now, one acre now. 00:14:12
Hope to have 8000 square foot lots to be the qualifier or 10,000 square foot quarter acre, whatever that is 10,000. Well quarter 00:14:49
would technically 11, but yeah, 10,000 would work, yeah, yeah. 00:14:56
So it already is 10,000 now, right? 00:15:04
Currently. 00:15:06
For me to have an external Adu you have to have 1/2 acre. 00:15:09
So our proposed, yes, our proposed changes brings that down to 10,000. 00:15:16
Understand. Sorry, what was your name again? David Seaman. David Seaman. Understand we've been working on this now for a little 00:15:22
over two months, so no worries. There's a little blur in there on some of these things. But yeah, if you wanna just give us a 00:15:27
quick rundown on your property and how the thoughts you have on the text amendment, we'll be happy to hear those. So hand them out 00:15:32
or not. 00:15:38
What's up and about or not anybody Needle. Copy. Sure. I'm a little reluctant to talk about a specific property when we're talking 00:15:43
about an ordinance. 00:15:49
I think, I think he has a point to make about the size going down, which is what we're proposing and he. 00:15:55
Might even support that. I very much support that. I just don't want to get into the weeds about a specific property. 00:16:02
Especially if it's something you might bring back to us in the future, then we don't have any. 00:16:10
Somehow we've approved something very much until there's an ordinance. No, she don't have the standard that I e-mail something or 00:16:15
and I've been super busy the last five weeks with a funeral and a bunch of other stuff going on. So yeah, she said just show up 00:16:19
and just talk and so I that's, yeah, I I think. 00:16:23
I would prefer that we not talk about the mixing. Just OK, that makes sense when you put it that way. 00:16:28
You might just want to stick around. 00:16:33
Or if there's that being said, you're welcome to go ahead and just make comment on the text amendment. Let's just do let's go with 00:16:37
that and then if anybody needs supplement, we'll go from there. I just very much support being able to lower the acreage to be 00:16:42
able to do these projects. 00:16:46
We own several properties and we buy and sell and I'm a general contractor. This is a part of our retirement is these income 00:16:52
properties and. 00:16:55
I love this town. We live in this town up on Wallace Lane and. 00:16:59
I support being able to utilize this valuable property to have a couple more people live in town and pay taxes. 00:17:03
OK. All right. Any questions for David from anyone, can I? Yeah and that so you own two properties, do you live on one of them, 00:17:11
you own three properties on holiday, we live on Wallace Lane. 00:17:16
But if I build this Adu, I would market it as a potential this thing is going to pay half your mortgage. 00:17:23
Here's the code. 00:17:29
This doesn't need to be my primary residence to make this a **** *** property. 00:17:31
I can market the thing as here's your two car garage, here's this, this is the pathway, here's the fence. 00:17:35
This could be for your mother-in-law. This could be for your daughter that just got pregnant. This could be for your, you know, 00:17:40
your widowed whoever, right? But. 00:17:44
I see that as a valuable huge asset when marketing a property to flip. So just to clarify, your interest in this would be from. 00:17:49
Financial incentive for yourself to go in and find these older properties and build an additional external Adu and then market it 00:18:00
as hey, you can get two houses for just a little bit more than the price of one type of scenario or internal. I've built a not 00:18:07
100. I've built many, many walkout basements. Cut out the window, cut the concrete rear egress, lock outdoor at the bottom of the 00:18:13
stairs like like that's. People see value in that when you can rent the basement for $1800 and pay half your mortgage. So yeah. 00:18:20
OK, Yep. 00:18:28
All right. Well, thank you very much. We appreciate it. Yeah. 00:18:30
All right. And is there any other public comment at this time? 00:18:35
OK. With that we will. 00:18:40
Close the public comments and now we will move into the finer points of let me make sure I got my 4 bullets on here that I'm not 00:18:42
mistaken on where we've covered. We need to pin down lot size, that's one of them. Currently it's proposed at 10. Ki assume 00:18:49
there's going to be a little bit of discussion around that And then we also need to talk about the smaller setbacks or 00:18:55
requirements for corner lots, what to do with the non conforming. 00:19:02
Existing structures and how this will apply to those and then. 00:19:10
I think there was just a little bit of clarity that we wanted to or I wanted to touchback on to with the minimum setbacks, but 10 00:19:14
foot sounds kind of like it was in line with what we're talking about last time. 00:19:19
So with that, let's. 00:19:25
Height. 00:19:29
Thank you. 00:19:30
Thank you. Thank you. 00:19:35
So with that, to kind of start into this discussion. 00:19:37
There were just a couple points of the text that I wanted to call out. 00:19:41
One of them was on lines 56 and 57, which specifically says be designed in a manner that is compatible with the neighborhood 00:19:46
residential vernacular. My concern around that is it's highly subjective and I could make an argument that every EADU should be 00:19:52
denied because it doesn't match what I think it should match in my neighborhood. So I wasn't sure if that was something other 00:19:58
people recognized or had concern on with Commissioner Gong. Yeah I that was one of my comments that I wrote last week is we've 00:20:05
this has come up in other. 00:20:11
You know applications? Does this match? 00:20:18
Whatever flavor the. 00:20:21
Neighborhood has, and I just find it to be not a very meaningful thing because some people say yes it does and other people say no 00:20:23
it doesn't. 00:20:26
I don't know. Looks like a house, you know? So I agree that that language to me is not. 00:20:29
Very median. It just makes a place to argue and say the roof looks different than our neighborhood. I don't like it. 00:20:35
Your house is square and none of the other houses are square, right. Like, I mean there's just there's there's lots of arguments 00:20:42
to be made there when you start getting into the vernacular discussion. So Commissioners, one thing I just wanted to check on, do 00:20:47
we feel like that? 00:20:51
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
* you need to log in to manage your favorites
My Favorites List
You haven't added any favorites yet. Click the "Add Favorite" button on any media page, and they'll show up here.
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Unable to preview the file.
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Unable to preview the file.
All right, Well, good evening. Welcome to the Holiday City Planning Commission on February 20th, 2024. Tonight in attendance we 00:00:01
have all commissioners except for Commissioner Prince, who gave regrets. She was only going to be able to join via Skype and we do 00:00:07
not have that set up to do so for her. 00:00:14
So she'll just have to yell at us later if we didn't get everything she wanted. 00:00:20
Hashed out. We also have our legal counsel and city staff Kerry Marsh with us. 00:00:24
And with that we have one item on the agenda, which is a continued public hearing item for the text amendment regarding accessory 00:00:31
dwelling units. But before we jump into all the fun and games with that, I have asked Commissioner Gong if she will read our 00:00:37
opening statement for any members of the public. 00:00:43
The City of Holiday Planning Commission is a volunteer citizen board whose function is to review land use plans and other special 00:00:54
studies, make recommendations to the City Council on proposed zoning map and ordinance changes, and approve conditional uses and 00:01:01
subdivisions. The Planning Commission does not initiate land use applications, rather acts on applications as they're submitted. 00:01:07
Commissioners do not meet with applicants except at publicly noticed meetings. 00:01:14
Commissioners attempt to visit each property on the agenda where the location. 00:01:22
The nature of the neighborhood, existing structures and uses related to the proposed change are noted. 00:01:26
Decisions are based on observations, recommendations from the professional planning staff. 00:01:32
The cities in our city's general plan, zoning ordinance and other reports. 00:01:36
By all verbal and written comments and by evidence submitted, all of which are part of the public record. 00:01:41
Thank you very much, Commissioner. 00:01:46
All right. And with that. 00:01:49
Carrie, if you will, just give us a brief overview and maybe a shout out since our last meeting. 00:01:52
The highlighted changes in the text amendment that we should be aware of, which by my recollection should have addressed three of 00:01:59
those things I sent out in the e-mail that we hopefully have figured out now. 00:02:04
Yes. So updated staff report kind of overviewed some of those changes that we discussed last time. And specifically we went over 00:02:10
ownership requirements. The Planning Commission wanted to see specific definitions for immediate family. So that's included in the 00:02:16
new language. 00:02:22
The language currently has a 10,000 square foot lot size and minimum. 00:02:30
There is an addition on there for corner lots and lots that have double frontage as they have two St. accesses. 00:02:37
Some of those details may need to be ironed out a little more with setbacks, because corner lots are a little bit more unique on 00:02:46
setbacks. 00:02:50
Other changes that were made. 00:02:55
Let's see. 00:02:59
Going through my list here. 00:03:02
Because we haven't gone into the conversion of existing accessory buildings. That's our later discussion. 00:03:06
Corner lots, double frontage, 10,000. Oh, and then the height is the other thing that we're looking at. The new proposed language 00:03:13
has graduated height set at six feet high for on the property line and then 45° over. For primary structures this is 8 feet and 00:03:20
then 45 over, so that does. 00:03:27
Create a lower profile for. 00:03:36
For external ad use, we did set the set back to a 10 foot minimum and then required to be larger according to the chart that's in 00:03:40
our current code for larger properties. 00:03:46
I believe that there is all of the changes that are on there. You can see the changes in the draft text. It's in the blue 00:03:54
underlines. 00:03:59
And the red is crossed out. Forward changes. 00:04:05
I think there are some changes in the red as well. Oh. 00:04:11
Oh, we added the dwelling unit occupancy as well into the code. So that's consistent through our code is occupancy is any number 00:04:16
of persons related by blood, marriage, adoption. So that just addresses the occupancy of units itself. 00:04:22
But ownership of the. 00:04:30
Is addressed in #4. 00:04:33
Lines 20 through 27 in the text. 00:04:37
Height All of the height was pulled from our existing code on accessory buildings. 00:04:43
With the graduated height envelope, specifically the change to. 00:04:50
6 feet is on line 81. 00:04:56
And then your minimum setbacks are on line 43 or 73 and 74. 00:05:00
I think that's everything. Are there any questions that the commissioners have for me before? 00:05:07
Well, I was, since we're working through this kind of a checklist specific type of order, unless any commissioners have any 00:05:13
objection, I figured maybe we'd start with any public comments so they don't have to sit through the next hour of discussion 00:05:20
waiting to to offer what they might have from the public. And then maybe we can move into ironing out some of those details later. 00:05:27
Does anyone have any concerns with doing that format tonight? 00:05:34
OK. So we'll have you sit down. Thank you very much. And with that, this is a continued public hearing. So we will invite any 00:05:42
members of the public that wish to come up and give feedback or input on this text amendment. We would ask that you keep that to 3 00:05:48
minutes or less. And when you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record. And with that, if anyone 00:05:54
would like to come up and make comment, we'll start those now. 00:06:00
All right. 00:06:10
Ron Hilton, 2394 Murray Holiday Rd. 00:06:15
I already sent an e-mail, so hopefully you saw that it was a fairly technical point. 00:06:21
Regarding. 00:06:29
The zones in which Adus should be allowed according to the state law. 00:06:31
I don't need to go into that if you if you saw that. 00:06:41
I don't think we've seen it. Was this sent at a prior time or did you send this today? I sent it a couple days ago. Was it on 00:06:45
Friday? 00:06:49
Actually, I think I sent it Sunday. On Sunday, yeah, so it didn't get added in with the holiday, but if you. 00:06:54
Want to just address your points on that? Sure, it's very brief. 00:07:02
OK. 00:07:25
So the. 00:07:27
The ordinance, as I implied, isn't entirely compliant with the state law. So reading the state law here, this is. 00:07:29
Section 10, nine A 5:30. 00:07:37
Internal accessory dwelling units in any area zoned primarily for residential use. 00:07:40
Hey, the use of an internal accessory dwelling unit is a permitted use. 00:07:47
B. Except as provided in subsections 3 and 4, skipping down to subsection 4. 00:07:53
A municipality may require that an internal accessory dwelling unit be designed in a manner that does not change the appearance of 00:07:59
the primary dwelling as a single family dwelling. 00:08:04
And then skipping down to. 00:08:10
The municipality may prohibit the creation of an internal accessory dwelling unit if the lot containing the primary dwelling unit 00:08:12
is 6000 square feet or less in size. 00:08:18
And so the point I want to get from that. 00:08:24
There is no requirement that the dwelling unit be in a single family zone. 00:08:29
It's only required that it be part of a single family detached. 00:08:34
Primary dwelling unit. 00:08:39
And that the lot be at least 6000 square feet, so the multifamily zones. 00:08:41
In holiday do allow for single family homes. 00:08:47
R28R210 RM all have a section that says you could have a single family home. 00:08:51
And so as long as the lot is at least 6000 square. 00:08:59
Then you know the according to the state law that should you know an Adu should be allowed an internal Adu. And so the change I 00:09:03
suggest is just less than one sentence. It's just in the very first paragraph of the. 00:09:11
Of the statute that we're reviewing tonight where it says. 00:09:19
Existing or new construction of accessory dwelling units are permitted in all single family residential zones R1 Fr one Fr 2.5 Fr 00:09:24
20 and then the part I would add is and single family dwellings in multifamily residential zones R2 RM on lots at least 6000 00:09:31
square feet in size. 00:09:38
That's the only thing I would add, but that would bring it into full conformity with the state law. 00:09:45
So that was really my only comment. 00:09:50
Thank you. Thank you, Ron. Appreciate that. And before we take another public comment on that, I'll just ask real quick. 00:09:53
Carrie, is that something that? 00:10:03
You have any insight on? 00:10:05
As far as requirement. 00:10:07
Council I do 13.04040 holiday city code. 00:10:09
Carrie, can you pull that up? 00:10:16
13.04 dot 04. 00:10:26
Detach straight within or detach. 00:11:00
So the section that Mister Hilton was referring to is internal ad use, which are allowed in every. 00:11:04
Zone by state code. 00:11:11
This is more this particular section is focusing on accessory dwelling units which are exterior to the home, not attached. 00:11:14
And not a part of the main res. 00:11:23
Primary residence. 00:11:26
So at least that's the intent. 00:11:28
Yeah. So I think what Mr. Hilton is saying is on. 00:11:31
Within our existing code for accessory dwelling units. 00:11:36
Just cleaning up the language while we are in there to. 00:11:39
Clarify that it's any single family dwelling. 00:11:44
Within any residential zone. 00:11:48
Instead of limiting to the. 00:11:50
Those specific Z. 00:11:52
But in the multi family, are we saying that, is that the intent? Do we really want in a multi family but if it's a single family 00:11:55
home to allow for an accessory dwelling unit? 00:11:59
If it's a signal I'm asking, I'm not telling. 00:12:04
But it'd be internal, not external in that language. Internal. Well, you can do internal, right? I mean that's that's kind of a 00:12:08
given. Yeah. Our code just says spelled out specifically R1, Fr one, Fr, 2.5 and FR20. So if we just clarify, take out those 00:12:15
zones, it's just a single family dwelling in a residential zone. 00:12:22
And then that would correct with the. 00:12:30
Yeah, so then that clears up the doesn't create a conflict. I don't see that that creates a conflict. 00:12:33
I can note that change good technical call out from the public. Thank you. And with that we'll we'll resume from any other members 00:12:40
of the public that wish make a comment tonight. 00:12:44
Well, I'm David Seaman. I'm talking about property, 4996 Mormont Circle. 00:12:51
I've got some paper for each of you. Can I hand that? 00:12:56
You. 00:13:02
Paper to hand out about your property site plan? Yeah. A plot map of what I've proposed to do. I'm this is my wife, Mindy. We we 00:13:03
hang on just a minute. You're not on the agenda. 00:13:07
So are you. We, In order for you to present before the Planning Commission, we have to. You know, state code requires you be a 00:13:12
part of the agenda. Oh, and you're not. So if this is the only thing we're accepting coming on right now, is the public hearing 00:13:17
related to that accessory dwelling unit, public amendments? 00:13:22
That's what I'm here to talk about. 00:13:28
Is an accessory growing. I've talked to her several times and. 00:13:30
So you're talking about the specific text of the. 00:13:33
Code here or or a site plan the size of the lot. 00:13:36
If it's a waste of time to have the paper, I won't, but I, my wife and I, I don't. I don't illegal anything, but we saved up a 00:13:40
long time and bought 2 properties in the last three to four years in holiday. 00:13:45
With the intent of putting Adus on them. And during my due diligence period, I came in and talked to the planners and they said, 00:13:50
yeah, that seems sort of reasonable. And apparently in the last four years that's changed. 00:13:54
And now we have these properties that I came in to apply and for an Adu on this has a. 00:13:59
It's called the Double St. Front potentially, and it's a perfectly everything meets code, everything meets the height 00:14:06
restrictions. The what? Everything else except for the lot requirement of I think it's one now, one acre now. 00:14:12
Hope to have 8000 square foot lots to be the qualifier or 10,000 square foot quarter acre, whatever that is 10,000. Well quarter 00:14:49
would technically 11, but yeah, 10,000 would work, yeah, yeah. 00:14:56
So it already is 10,000 now, right? 00:15:04
Currently. 00:15:06
For me to have an external Adu you have to have 1/2 acre. 00:15:09
So our proposed, yes, our proposed changes brings that down to 10,000. 00:15:16
Understand. Sorry, what was your name again? David Seaman. David Seaman. Understand we've been working on this now for a little 00:15:22
over two months, so no worries. There's a little blur in there on some of these things. But yeah, if you wanna just give us a 00:15:27
quick rundown on your property and how the thoughts you have on the text amendment, we'll be happy to hear those. So hand them out 00:15:32
or not. 00:15:38
What's up and about or not anybody Needle. Copy. Sure. I'm a little reluctant to talk about a specific property when we're talking 00:15:43
about an ordinance. 00:15:49
I think, I think he has a point to make about the size going down, which is what we're proposing and he. 00:15:55
Might even support that. I very much support that. I just don't want to get into the weeds about a specific property. 00:16:02
Especially if it's something you might bring back to us in the future, then we don't have any. 00:16:10
Somehow we've approved something very much until there's an ordinance. No, she don't have the standard that I e-mail something or 00:16:15
and I've been super busy the last five weeks with a funeral and a bunch of other stuff going on. So yeah, she said just show up 00:16:19
and just talk and so I that's, yeah, I I think. 00:16:23
I would prefer that we not talk about the mixing. Just OK, that makes sense when you put it that way. 00:16:28
You might just want to stick around. 00:16:33
Or if there's that being said, you're welcome to go ahead and just make comment on the text amendment. Let's just do let's go with 00:16:37
that and then if anybody needs supplement, we'll go from there. I just very much support being able to lower the acreage to be 00:16:42
able to do these projects. 00:16:46
We own several properties and we buy and sell and I'm a general contractor. This is a part of our retirement is these income 00:16:52
properties and. 00:16:55
I love this town. We live in this town up on Wallace Lane and. 00:16:59
I support being able to utilize this valuable property to have a couple more people live in town and pay taxes. 00:17:03
OK. All right. Any questions for David from anyone, can I? Yeah and that so you own two properties, do you live on one of them, 00:17:11
you own three properties on holiday, we live on Wallace Lane. 00:17:16
But if I build this Adu, I would market it as a potential this thing is going to pay half your mortgage. 00:17:23
Here's the code. 00:17:29
This doesn't need to be my primary residence to make this a **** *** property. 00:17:31
I can market the thing as here's your two car garage, here's this, this is the pathway, here's the fence. 00:17:35
This could be for your mother-in-law. This could be for your daughter that just got pregnant. This could be for your, you know, 00:17:40
your widowed whoever, right? But. 00:17:44
I see that as a valuable huge asset when marketing a property to flip. So just to clarify, your interest in this would be from. 00:17:49
Financial incentive for yourself to go in and find these older properties and build an additional external Adu and then market it 00:18:00
as hey, you can get two houses for just a little bit more than the price of one type of scenario or internal. I've built a not 00:18:07
100. I've built many, many walkout basements. Cut out the window, cut the concrete rear egress, lock outdoor at the bottom of the 00:18:13
stairs like like that's. People see value in that when you can rent the basement for $1800 and pay half your mortgage. So yeah. 00:18:20
OK, Yep. 00:18:28
All right. Well, thank you very much. We appreciate it. Yeah. 00:18:30
All right. And is there any other public comment at this time? 00:18:35
OK. With that we will. 00:18:40
Close the public comments and now we will move into the finer points of let me make sure I got my 4 bullets on here that I'm not 00:18:42
mistaken on where we've covered. We need to pin down lot size, that's one of them. Currently it's proposed at 10. Ki assume 00:18:49
there's going to be a little bit of discussion around that And then we also need to talk about the smaller setbacks or 00:18:55
requirements for corner lots, what to do with the non conforming. 00:19:02
Existing structures and how this will apply to those and then. 00:19:10
I think there was just a little bit of clarity that we wanted to or I wanted to touchback on to with the minimum setbacks, but 10 00:19:14
foot sounds kind of like it was in line with what we're talking about last time. 00:19:19
So with that, let's. 00:19:25
Height. 00:19:29
Thank you. 00:19:30
Thank you. Thank you. 00:19:35
So with that, to kind of start into this discussion. 00:19:37
There were just a couple points of the text that I wanted to call out. 00:19:41
One of them was on lines 56 and 57, which specifically says be designed in a manner that is compatible with the neighborhood 00:19:46
residential vernacular. My concern around that is it's highly subjective and I could make an argument that every EADU should be 00:19:52
denied because it doesn't match what I think it should match in my neighborhood. So I wasn't sure if that was something other 00:19:58
people recognized or had concern on with Commissioner Gong. Yeah I that was one of my comments that I wrote last week is we've 00:20:05
this has come up in other. 00:20:11
You know applications? Does this match? 00:20:18
Whatever flavor the. 00:20:21
Neighborhood has, and I just find it to be not a very meaningful thing because some people say yes it does and other people say no 00:20:23
it doesn't. 00:20:26
I don't know. Looks like a house, you know? So I agree that that language to me is not. 00:20:29
Very median. It just makes a place to argue and say the roof looks different than our neighborhood. I don't like it. 00:20:35
Your house is square and none of the other houses are square, right. Like, I mean there's just there's there's lots of arguments 00:20:42
to be made there when you start getting into the vernacular discussion. So Commissioners, one thing I just wanted to check on, do 00:20:47
we feel like that? 00:20:51
scroll up