Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge? Click Here
No Bookmarks Exist.
Now, this flexibility is particularly. | 2024-09-16 09:54:40 | |
Relevant when the uniform setbacks fund that. | 2024-09-16 09:54:43 | |
Disproportionately affect properties with. | 2024-09-16 09:54:46 | |
Unique shape and characteristics. | 2024-09-16 09:54:49 | |
Belief that granted the variance to maintain. | 2024-09-16 09:54:52 | |
The proposed 25.25 feet set back. | 2024-09-16 09:54:55 | |
That would be key to ensuring that the fairness. | 2024-09-16 09:54:58 | |
Principle is accommodated while upholding the. | 2024-09-16 09:55:01 | |
Spirit of the zoning intent. | 2024-09-16 09:55:04 | |
Recommendations City staff concluded that a big. | 2024-09-16 09:55:07 | |
Based off of the technical review of the city code. | 2024-09-16 09:55:10 | |
Of the geospatial characteristics of the context. | 2024-09-16 09:55:13 | |
Granting the 7.2 variant. | 2024-09-16 09:55:16 | |
For the front yard appears to be the. | 2024-09-16 09:55:19 | |
Least intrusive solution to upholding the. | 2024-09-16 09:55:22 | |
Period of zoning as outlined in Section 30. | 2024-09-16 09:55:25 | |
3 point 14.050 now. | 2024-09-16 09:55:28 | |
Discussions regarding denials. | 2024-09-16 09:55:31 | |
Of this case should be moderated by the administration. | 2024-09-16 09:55:34 | |
Cities appeals here in officer by examining. | 2024-09-16 09:55:37 | |
The language of the city code the applicants. | 2024-09-16 09:55:40 | |
Narrative to be presented to us stuff. | 2024-09-16 09:55:43 | |
Recommendation and the proceedings from the public here. | 2024-09-16 09:55:46 | |
As well as other submissions that I received here. | 2024-09-16 09:55:49 | |
From the city staff's perspective. | 2024-09-16 09:55:52 | |
The subject property possesses unique characteristics. | 2024-09-16 09:55:55 | |
From others within the vicinity. | 2024-09-16 09:55:58 | |
I would circle and requiring compliance with the city. | 2024-09-16 09:56:01 | |
Code presents an unreasonable hardship. | 2024-09-16 09:56:04 | |
This variance request. | 2024-09-16 09:56:07 | |
Seems to pass the five part test. | 2024-09-16 09:56:10 | |
For variance standards and city staff, Richard. | 2024-09-16 09:56:13 | |
Approval. Thank you. Thank. | 2024-09-16 09:56:16 | |
Before I have a question for you. | 2024-09-16 09:56:19 | |
In regards to the special circumstance. | 2024-09-16 09:56:22 | |
You indicated that. | 2024-09-16 09:56:25 | |
At the rectangular shape. | 2024-09-16 09:56:28 | |
Lot is being assessed relative to irregular sheep. | 2024-09-16 09:56:31 | |
Plot within the cul-de-sac. | 2024-09-16 09:56:34 | |
Elongated with pie shaped front, Yeah. | 2024-09-16 09:56:37 | |
Mentioned orientation, will you expand on what? | 2024-09-16 09:56:40 | |
Is that an irregular orientation or what do you? | 2024-09-16 09:56:43 | |
Referring to there And why is that? | 2024-09-16 09:56:46 | |
Special or unique to this property? | 2024-09-16 09:56:49 | |
Yeah, that'd be great. | 2024-09-16 09:56:52 | |
Yeah, so ask you to. | 2024-09-16 09:56:55 | |
But but. | 2024-09-16 09:56:58 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 09:57:01 | |
The different properties within the. | 2024-09-16 09:57:04 | |
That's why I would circle. | 2024-09-16 09:57:07 | |
You are pretty nerd according to you. | 2024-09-16 09:57:10 | |
You revolve? I think so. | 2024-09-16 09:57:13 | |
That means that on the rear side of the property is. | 2024-09-16 09:57:16 | |
Large and it taper to the front. | 2024-09-16 09:57:19 | |
Now, according to Studio Holiday. | 2024-09-16 09:57:22 | |
Set back to comment. | 2024-09-16 09:57:25 | |
We are supposed to use that with. | 2024-09-16 09:57:28 | |
Property determined side of that. | 2024-09-16 09:57:31 | |
And then after we do know that. | 2024-09-16 09:57:34 | |
Yeah, that's 14. | 2024-09-16 09:57:37 | |
It's working. | 2024-09-16 09:57:43 | |
No, as you can see. | 2024-09-16 09:57:46 | |
Property question is. | 2024-09-16 09:57:49 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 09:57:52 | |
Phase of the plot, so. | 2024-09-16 09:57:58 | |
And again. | 2024-09-16 09:58:01 | |
To identify from the analysis of that. | 2024-09-16 09:58:04 | |
The loss that seemed to be. | 2024-09-16 09:58:07 | |
Similar to the applicant property question. | 2024-09-16 09:58:10 | |
What's this neighboring property which is also shared in? | 2024-09-16 09:58:13 | |
When you. | 2024-09-16 09:58:17 | |
This applicant. | 2024-09-16 09:58:25 | |
This neighboring property actually has very. | 2024-09-16 09:58:28 | |
Approximately 15.1928. | 2024-09-16 09:58:35 | |
So those were. | 2024-09-16 09:58:38 | |
Right, so I understand it'd be. | 2024-09-16 09:58:44 | |
Because of these unique characteristics. | 2024-09-16 09:58:47 | |
When you do the averaging calculation. | 2024-09-16 09:58:50 | |
And under section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 09:58:52 | |
.04054. | 2024-09-16 09:58:56 | |
The result is somewhat skewed. | 2024-09-16 09:58:59 | |
Because you're assuming that you're. | 2024-09-16 09:59:02 | |
Normally, that statute applies to regularly shaped. | 2024-09-16 09:59:05 | |
That's correct. What's correct? | 2024-09-16 09:59:08 | |
I need to understand that. OK. Thank you, Mr. Ford. | 2024-09-16 09:59:11 | |
Appreciate it. | 2024-09-16 09:59:13 | |
The applicant. | 2024-09-16 09:59:14 | |
Uh. | 2024-09-16 09:59:29 | |
I think the basic. | 2024-09-16 09:59:32 | |
Ideas of what we're. | 2024-09-16 09:59:35 | |
Playing for today have been very well outlined by the city. | 2024-09-16 09:59:38 | |
Unfortunately, because of. | 2024-09-16 09:59:41 | |
Other scheduling conflicts. | 2024-09-16 09:59:44 | |
Person who wrote this narrative was. | 2024-09-16 09:59:47 | |
Unable to be with us, but I'll share some of the key points. | 2024-09-16 09:59:50 | |
He, he, the architect and. | 2024-09-16 09:59:53 | |
The owner worked through to come. | 2024-09-16 09:59:56 | |
Up with these points. | 2024-09-16 09:59:58 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 09:59:59 | |
Obviously we're requesting a. | 2024-09-16 10:00:02 | |
To reduce the setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:00:05 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 10:00:08 | |
The. | 2024-09-16 10:00:14 | |
From other properties, the lot was subdivided into. | 2024-09-16 10:00:20 | |
Two lots, the shape of the shape and being of the corner. | 2024-09-16 10:00:23 | |
Is being unique to this neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:00:26 | |
As mentioned above, the code requirement is 20 feet set back for the. | 2024-09-16 10:00:29 | |
Corner lots. The other lots used in the established. | 2024-09-16 10:00:32 | |
Established the average setbacks are located. | 2024-09-16 10:00:35 | |
Within the cul-de-sac and have varying front yard set back. | 2024-09-16 10:00:38 | |
Conditions. | 2024-09-16 10:00:40 | |
There was an attached site plan that's been displayed. | 2024-09-16 10:00:44 | |
Today benefits. | 2024-09-16 10:00:47 | |
And other other properties, same zoning. Enjoy. | 2024-09-16 10:00:50 | |
The neighbor across the street, 4405 S. | 2024-09-16 10:00:53 | |
Briarwood Circle is a corner. | 2024-09-16 10:00:56 | |
Lot it has an average set back of. | 2024-09-16 10:00:59 | |
Two feet. It will enhance the. | 2024-09-16 10:01:02 | |
Visual quality of the neighborhood and will add value to the. | 2024-09-16 10:01:05 | |
This will allow the structure of that. | 2024-09-16 10:01:08 | |
Property owners to enjoy. | 2024-09-16 10:01:11 | |
The other thing is that not to deviate from the general purpose. | 2024-09-16 10:01:14 | |
To the holiday holiday code, the purpose proposed. | 2024-09-16 10:01:17 | |
Home with the variance would still comply with. | 2024-09-16 10:01:20 | |
All holiday codes, including including site coverage. | 2024-09-16 10:01:23 | |
Impermeable service requirements. Height limits. | 2024-09-16 10:01:26 | |
And view corridor requirements it will comply. | 2024-09-16 10:01:29 | |
With code. With code 20 foot corner. | 2024-09-16 10:01:32 | |
Side setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:01:35 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 10:01:50 | |
The owners obviously not here. | 2024-09-16 10:01:53 | |
But the owner? | 2024-09-16 10:01:56 | |
My experience has been building in holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:01:59 | |
10 to 15 years and. | 2024-09-16 10:02:02 | |
Feel that the projects that I've been involved with. | 2024-09-16 10:02:05 | |
Have been a benefit to the City of Holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:02:08 | |
In addition to that the the owner. | 2024-09-16 10:02:11 | |
Just feed me on her behalf. | 2024-09-16 10:02:14 | |
Amazing access to that neighborhood. She's just a great person. | 2024-09-16 10:02:17 | |
Person and I'd love to have her as a neighbor myself. | 2024-09-16 10:02:20 | |
That's all question. | 2024-09-16 10:02:23 | |
So the law requires. | 2024-09-16 10:02:26 | |
Not only hardship, and I think I understand the hardship you can't do. | 2024-09-16 10:02:29 | |
Home that you. | 2024-09-16 10:02:32 | |
Have designed, but the other question is what? | 2024-09-16 10:02:35 | |
The special circumstance. | 2024-09-16 10:02:38 | |
Unique. | 2024-09-16 10:02:38 | |
Of this property that causes this hardship. | 2024-09-16 10:02:41 | |
Will you address what that special circumstance? | 2024-09-16 10:02:44 | |
To your property. | 2024-09-16 10:02:47 | |
Yeah, I think Justice was able to out like that. | 2024-09-16 10:02:50 | |
Fairly well, but the special circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:02:53 | |
Is the unique? | 2024-09-16 10:02:56 | |
Shape of the lot and. | 2024-09-16 10:02:59 | |
Corner the corner set back requirements. | 2024-09-16 10:03:02 | |
With the front yard. | 2024-09-16 10:03:05 | |
Regard to the pie shake homes. | 2024-09-16 10:03:08 | |
Was outlined already. | 2024-09-16 10:03:11 | |
The hardship falls where. | 2024-09-16 10:03:14 | |
You would want to build a home that is. | 2024-09-16 10:03:17 | |
Beautiful and complements the neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:03:20 | |
But would also not allow that owner to have. | 2024-09-16 10:03:23 | |
Any sort of a backyard. | 2024-09-16 10:03:26 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:03:29 | |
Any other comments from the city? | 2024-09-16 10:03:32 | |
All right. | 2024-09-16 10:03:35 | |
I'm going to. Could you give me a couple of minutes just to? | 2024-09-16 10:03:42 | |
Get my thoughts together on this and. | 2024-09-16 10:03:44 | |
Bye bye. | 2024-09-16 10:05:03 | |
Alright. | 2024-09-16 10:05:06 | |
We're back on the record. | 2024-09-16 10:05:09 | |
Will have a written decision. I will provide that to. | 2024-09-16 10:05:12 | |
The party that really. | 2024-09-16 10:05:15 | |
Decision should be available to you within. | 2024-09-16 10:05:18 | |
Five business days, I should have that. | 2024-09-16 10:05:21 | |
But I am ready to. | 2024-09-16 10:05:24 | |
State verbally. | 2024-09-16 10:05:27 | |
The decision. | 2024-09-16 10:05:30 | |
Decision will supersede what I state for the record. | 2024-09-16 10:05:33 | |
Today. But I think you want a decision so today. | 2024-09-16 10:05:36 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 10:05:39 | |
But the applicant has filed a request for a variance. | 2024-09-16 10:05:42 | |
Under section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:05:45 | |
04 of the city code. | 2024-09-16 10:05:48 | |
Utah requiring a minimum front set back. | 2024-09-16 10:05:51 | |
32.53 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:05:54 | |
Structures of the property line and the applicant request of their. | 2024-09-16 10:05:57 | |
And to allow for a front yard set back of. | 2024-09-16 10:06:00 | |
25.25 feet and stop me if I don't have. | 2024-09-16 10:06:03 | |
This correctly. | 2024-09-16 10:06:06 | |
African is required to meet the front yard set. | 2024-09-16 10:06:12 | |
Prescribed by section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:06:15 | |
.054 of the code. | 2024-09-16 10:06:18 | |
African cannot build a home that they had planned. | 2024-09-16 10:06:21 | |
The city has India. | 2024-09-16 10:06:24 | |
Indicated that this is a reasonably sized. | 2024-09-16 10:06:27 | |
Home compared to other homes on the cold affect. | 2024-09-16 10:06:30 | |
And so it would be an unreasonable heart. | 2024-09-16 10:06:33 | |
Prevent applicant from building reasonably sized. | 2024-09-16 10:06:36 | |
Tone. The issue is the surface. | 2024-09-16 10:06:39 | |
Fans peculiar to applicants property. | 2024-09-16 10:06:42 | |
The circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:06:45 | |
Peculiar to applicants property causing a. | 2024-09-16 10:06:48 | |
Is a somewhat skewed result. | 2024-09-16 10:06:51 | |
The averaging system calculation. Infection. | 2024-09-16 10:06:54 | |
13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:06:57 | |
4.054 The code to determine the request. | 2024-09-16 10:07:00 | |
Back requirement applicants. | 2024-09-16 10:07:06 | |
Corner lot is assessed relative to irate. | 2024-09-16 10:07:09 | |
Shaped lots within a cul-de-sac that are. | 2024-09-16 10:07:12 | |
Elongated with pie shaped front. | 2024-09-16 10:07:15 | |
The calculation provided in Section 3. | 2024-09-16 10:07:18 | |
15.14 point 04 assumes comparison comparison. | 2024-09-16 10:07:21 | |
Of similar properties with regular shape front law. | 2024-09-16 10:07:24 | |
This circumstance is not self-imposed. | 2024-09-16 10:07:27 | |
Or economic. | 2024-09-16 10:07:30 | |
The. | 2024-09-16 10:07:33 | |
Neighboring property across the street from applicants property. | 2024-09-16 10:07:36 | |
In the same cold as that currently has a required. | 2024-09-16 10:07:39 | |
Set back of 20.2. | 2024-09-16 10:07:42 | |
That right and the properties on the. | 2024-09-16 10:07:45 | |
South and east side of the applicant's property have front yard set. | 2024-09-16 10:07:48 | |
Back to 22 feet and 16 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:07:51 | |
Respectively. | 2024-09-16 10:07:54 | |
Of 25.25 feet will. | 2024-09-16 10:07:57 | |
Provide the applicant with substantial enjoyment of property right. | 2024-09-16 10:08:00 | |
Similar to those enjoyed by the Prop. | 2024-09-16 10:08:03 | |
Parties in the zone. | 2024-09-16 10:08:06 | |
This variant would not change. | 2024-09-16 10:08:09 | |
The character and development pattern of the neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:08:12 | |
And I stated the code. | 2024-09-16 10:08:15 | |
Instruction to be flexible to produce equal. | 2024-09-16 10:08:18 | |
Outcome is relevant when uniform set back. | 2024-09-16 10:08:21 | |
Standards would disproportionately affect properties. | 2024-09-16 10:08:24 | |
Unique shapes and characteristics. | 2024-09-16 10:08:27 | |
Granting a variance would ensure that the. | 2024-09-16 10:08:30 | |
Financial justice is done while holding the spirit. | 2024-09-16 10:08:33 | |
Of the zoning ordinance. | 2024-09-16 10:08:36 | |
So the decision is that. | 2024-09-16 10:08:39 | |
The applicant has met the burden. | 2024-09-16 10:08:42 | |
Approving 5 conditions justifying the. | 2024-09-16 10:08:45 | |
Variant accordingly. | 2024-09-16 10:08:48 | |
Applicant is granted a variance for. | 2024-09-16 10:08:51 | |
Property and the literal enforcement of section 13. | 2024-09-16 10:08:54 | |
.1404 the code as far. | 2024-09-16 10:08:57 | |
The front yard set back about the. | 2024-09-16 10:09:00 | |
Property shall be a minimum 25.5. | 2024-09-16 10:09:03 | |
Feet rather than the minimum. | 2024-09-16 10:09:06 | |
32.50 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:09:09 | |
Repeat required in section 13. | 2024-09-16 10:09:12 | |
14.054 of the code. | 2024-09-16 10:09:15 | |
Which is a variance of 77 point. | 2024-09-16 10:09:18 | |
To 8 feet applicant shall complete. | 2024-09-16 10:09:21 | |
Why with all other applicable provisions of the code? | 2024-09-16 10:09:24 | |
Including securing the required building permit. | 2024-09-16 10:09:27 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:09:30 | |
OK, the next item on the agenda is. | 2024-09-16 10:09:42 | |
The Holiday heights subsidy. | 2024-09-16 10:09:45 | |
In at the Holiday Peaks corner side set back. | 2024-09-16 10:09:48 | |
Variant. | 2024-09-16 10:09:51 | |
Representatives from the applicant here. | 2024-09-16 10:09:54 | |
Again, for the record. | 2024-09-16 10:10:09 | |
Goose was making this presentation. | 2024-09-16 10:10:13 | |
City planner, thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:10:18 | |
Jonathan Trailing Community Economic. | 2024-09-16 10:10:21 | |
And for the applicant. | 2024-09-16 10:10:24 | |
OK. | 2024-09-16 10:10:37 | |
First of all, I I want to. | 2024-09-16 10:10:39 | |
State, for the record, that I, the hearing officer. | 2024-09-16 10:10:43 | |
Have no conflicts of interest. | 2024-09-16 10:10:46 | |
Communicated with the city only for purposes of scheduling. | 2024-09-16 10:10:49 | |
And receiving materials. | 2024-09-16 10:10:51 | |
Under. | 2024-09-16 10:10:55 | |
Utah code and the Holiday City code. | 2024-09-16 10:10:58 | |
Excuse me? | 2024-09-16 10:11:01 | |
Uh. | 2024-09-16 10:11:07 | |
A duly appointed administrative appeals. | 2024-09-16 10:11:12 | |
Their self here and decide requests for variance. | 2024-09-16 10:11:16 | |
My name is Frank McNamara. | 2024-09-16 10:11:19 | |
Appointed administrative appeals officer for. | 2024-09-16 10:11:22 | |
Holiday city I do have. | 2024-09-16 10:11:25 | |
Information that has been presented to me, it's. | 2024-09-16 10:11:28 | |
The applicants. | 2024-09-16 10:11:31 | |
And the information they provided and. | 2024-09-16 10:11:34 | |
Also a city staff report. Did you get a copy? | 2024-09-16 10:11:37 | |
City staff report OK, so. | 2024-09-16 10:11:40 | |
So we shall that will be available. | 2024-09-16 10:11:43 | |
For my review and consideration. | 2024-09-16 10:11:46 | |
So we begin with the city making a presentation. | 2024-09-16 10:11:49 | |
To four. | 2024-09-16 10:11:51 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:11:58 | |
Very much so this is. | 2024-09-16 10:12:01 | |
The case number 2 on the agenda today. | 2024-09-16 10:12:04 | |
And this is a corner side. | 2024-09-16 10:12:07 | |
Set back variant application. | 2024-09-16 10:12:10 | |
The address for the subject property is. | 2024-09-16 10:12:13 | |
4930 SW Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:12:16 | |
Holiday, Utah zip code 84117. | 2024-09-16 10:12:19 | |
Now this property. | 2024-09-16 10:12:22 | |
Size 0.25 acres and. | 2024-09-16 10:12:25 | |
Located within one of our single family residential. | 2024-09-16 10:12:28 | |
Now the governing. | 2024-09-16 10:12:31 | |
That pertain to. | 2024-09-16 10:12:34 | |
That hearing would be fun. | 2024-09-16 10:12:37 | |
In Title 13. | 2024-09-16 10:12:40 | |
Subsection 14.57 related. | 2024-09-16 10:12:43 | |
Corner size setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:12:46 | |
And then the variance which is. | 2024-09-16 10:12:49 | |
Title 13.09. Point 02. | 2024-09-16 10:12:52 | |
Now the request. | 2024-09-16 10:12:55 | |
Here today is that the applicant is seeking out. | 2024-09-16 10:12:58 | |
The City of Holiday code. | 2024-09-16 10:13:04 | |
Section 13. Point 14.5. | 2024-09-16 10:13:07 | |
7 pertaining to the corner side, set that. | 2024-09-16 10:13:10 | |
Now. | 2024-09-16 10:13:13 | |
Code regulates the. | 2024-09-16 10:13:16 | |
Minimum corner side set back on the public's. | 2024-09-16 10:13:19 | |
Street, a private road or a private. | 2024-09-16 10:13:22 | |
And the applicant is. | 2024-09-16 10:13:25 | |
Requesting to be granted a relief. | 2024-09-16 10:13:28 | |
From the prescribed 20 feet, standardized. | 2024-09-16 10:13:31 | |
Corner side set back and proposing to mention. | 2024-09-16 10:13:34 | |
At 12.4 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:13:37 | |
Corner on a site. | 2024-09-16 10:13:40 | |
Said Doug. So now this. | 2024-09-16 10:13:43 | |
Would represent the 15%. | 2024-09-16 10:13:46 | |
Set back requirement for. | 2024-09-16 10:13:49 | |
Side yard and. | 2024-09-16 10:13:52 | |
Exception would herein constitute. | 2024-09-16 10:13:55 | |
.6 feet corner side set back variant. | 2024-09-16 10:13:58 | |
Which would also run with the landing perpetuity. | 2024-09-16 10:14:01 | |
Now the background to this case is. | 2024-09-16 10:14:04 | |
That the applicant and agent. | 2024-09-16 10:14:07 | |
Heights Subdivision, LLC. | 2024-09-16 10:14:10 | |
And Mr. Peter, represented here, have. | 2024-09-16 10:14:13 | |
Filed an appeal with the administrative here. | 2024-09-16 10:14:16 | |
Seeking a variance to. | 2024-09-16 10:14:19 | |
Portions of holiday city code specific. | 2024-09-16 10:14:22 | |
Pertaining to the corner side set back distance. | 2024-09-16 10:14:25 | |
Required for any main structure. | 2024-09-16 10:14:28 | |
To the corner side of the property. | 2024-09-16 10:14:31 | |
Now the applicant has proposed the construction. | 2024-09-16 10:14:34 | |
Kind of a new home on the subject property, which is. | 2024-09-16 10:14:37 | |
The corner lot in the new holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:14:40 | |
Subdivision which you can see on the screen. | 2024-09-16 10:14:43 | |
Now the property located on 4930. | 2024-09-16 10:14:46 | |
East SW Moore Rd. Was formerly the. | 2024-09-16 10:14:49 | |
Site of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day. | 2024-09-16 10:14:52 | |
Saint Meetinghouse and. | 2024-09-16 10:14:55 | |
The applicant has completed the. | 2024-09-16 10:14:58 | |
Of the subdivision improvements and recording of the. | 2024-09-16 10:15:01 | |
With the building permit application yet? | 2024-09-16 10:15:04 | |
To be submitted to the city. | 2024-09-16 10:15:07 | |
Applicants have determined that the application of. | 2024-09-16 10:15:10 | |
Holiday City Code section 13.4. | 2024-09-16 10:15:13 | |
.057. | 2024-09-16 10:15:16 | |
Site setbacks would restrict. | 2024-09-16 10:15:19 | |
The proposed development on Lot 1. | 2024-09-16 10:15:22 | |
05, which is located on the northwest. | 2024-09-16 10:15:25 | |
Western corner of the subdivision. | 2024-09-16 10:15:28 | |
On the screen now. | 2024-09-16 10:15:31 | |
In that lot 105 is located on the. | 2024-09-16 10:15:34 | |
Intersection of Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:15:37 | |
And Delora Ling, the aforementioned set back. | 2024-09-16 10:15:40 | |
Gone in regulation requires all mainstream. | 2024-09-16 10:15:43 | |
On the corner lot to be assessed at a stand. | 2024-09-16 10:15:46 | |
That's 20 feet set back. | 2024-09-16 10:15:49 | |
Now the applicant is of the opinion that. | 2024-09-16 10:15:52 | |
105 certain. | 2024-09-16 10:15:55 | |
Unique conditions to be assessed using. | 2024-09-16 10:15:58 | |
Typical sidey outfit. | 2024-09-16 10:16:01 | |
Of the corner side set back. | 2024-09-16 10:16:04 | |
So they are hereby requesting a relief from the city. | 2024-09-16 10:16:10 | |
Code related to the standards 20 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:16:13 | |
Corner site setbacks and in turn. | 2024-09-16 10:16:16 | |
Seeking permission to maintain equity. | 2024-09-16 10:16:19 | |
A side yard set back which would be 12. | 2024-09-16 10:16:22 | |
.4 feet from the east side of. | 2024-09-16 10:16:25 | |
The property Additional information. | 2024-09-16 10:16:28 | |
The applicant's narrative supporting documents, including. | 2024-09-16 10:16:31 | |
Cyclone would be presented. | 2024-09-16 10:16:34 | |
Hearing by the applicant. | 2024-09-16 10:16:37 | |
Ordinances that pertain to this. | 2024-09-16 10:16:40 | |
It's the holiday city code on. | 2024-09-16 10:16:43 | |
Setbacks, Section 13.14 Point. | 2024-09-16 10:16:47 | |
050 and Holiday City Court. | 2024-09-16 10:16:49 | |
On corner site setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:16:52 | |
13 point 14.057. | 2024-09-16 10:16:55 | |
And then holiday city ordinance on. | 2024-09-16 10:16:58 | |
Side yard setbacks which is. | 2024-09-16 10:17:01 | |
13 point 14.056. | 2024-09-16 10:17:04 | |
And again the approval of standard. | 2024-09-16 10:17:07 | |
As outlined by the state would be the same as. | 2024-09-16 10:17:10 | |
The one that was used to assess the first. | 2024-09-16 10:17:14 | |
Case this morning. | 2024-09-16 10:17:16 | |
So again, it is standard. | 2024-09-16 10:17:20 | |
Procedure for city staff to conduct an announcement. | 2024-09-16 10:17:22 | |
Based off of the contents of this. | 2024-09-16 10:17:26 | |
Subject property City staff does not. | 2024-09-16 10:17:29 | |
Vote on these matters and acts only. | 2024-09-16 10:17:32 | |
Advisory position on the technical aspects of the application. | 2024-09-16 10:17:35 | |
Now. | 2024-09-16 10:17:38 | |
Of the analysis, the 1st. | 2024-09-16 10:17:41 | |
Assessment that city staff did was to. | 2024-09-16 10:17:44 | |
First determine the intent. | 2024-09-16 10:17:47 | |
Intent of the 3D code. | 2024-09-16 10:17:50 | |
Now, the purpose of the city ordinance as outlined in. | 2024-09-16 10:17:53 | |
Section 13.14. Point. | 2024-09-16 10:17:56 | |
It states that pursuant to the city. | 2024-09-16 10:17:59 | |
Ordinance regulating setbacks on coronal law. | 2024-09-16 10:18:02 | |
But the minimum corner set set back. | 2024-09-16 10:18:05 | |
For any structure on a public. | 2024-09-16 10:18:08 | |
A private road or a private lane? | 2024-09-16 10:18:11 | |
Shall be 20 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:18:14 | |
Or intent of this standard 20. | 2024-09-16 10:18:17 | |
Set by difference for main structures and. | 2024-09-16 10:18:20 | |
Corner lot is to save God. | 2024-09-16 10:18:23 | |
Public health, safety and welfare. | 2024-09-16 10:18:26 | |
By way of regulating that spacing of building. | 2024-09-16 10:18:29 | |
Things and structures our way from property lines. | 2024-09-16 10:18:32 | |
The right away physical hazards and natural. | 2024-09-16 10:18:35 | |
Ultimately, these. | 2024-09-16 10:18:38 | |
Facing revelations seek to provide for. | 2024-09-16 10:18:41 | |
Lighten shade. | 2024-09-16 10:18:44 | |
In air movement, the use of passes. | 2024-09-16 10:18:47 | |
And active spaces and vegetation in the city. | 2024-09-16 10:18:50 | |
Which would ultimately contribute to that. | 2024-09-16 10:18:53 | |
Directly impacting the fiscal. | 2024-09-16 10:18:56 | |
In psychological well-being of residents. | 2024-09-16 10:18:59 | |
City staff have determined that the critical factor is. | 2024-09-16 10:19:02 | |
Assessing conformance with the general purpose and. | 2024-09-16 10:19:05 | |
Intent of this ordinance. | 2024-09-16 10:19:08 | |
That the public safety element is compromised. | 2024-09-16 10:19:11 | |
In this scenario particularly regardless. | 2024-09-16 10:19:14 | |
In the club you restrictions and in. | 2024-09-16 10:19:17 | |
Attacks on traffic flow and pedestrian safety. | 2024-09-16 10:19:20 | |
Since this is on a corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:19:23 | |
Now the first assessment was impact. | 2024-09-16 10:19:26 | |
Restrictions now. | 2024-09-16 10:19:29 | |
Of holidays to decode on Clearview restriction. | 2024-09-16 10:19:32 | |
Specified in section 13 Point. | 2024-09-16 10:19:35 | |
76.7108. | 2024-09-16 10:19:38 | |
One it states that no. | 2024-09-16 10:19:41 | |
Construction in excess of two feet. | 2024-09-16 10:19:44 | |
In height shall be placed within the report. | 2024-09-16 10:19:47 | |
Clearview area of the corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:19:50 | |
Now our spatial analysis. | 2024-09-16 10:19:53 | |
But the proposed location of the main house. | 2024-09-16 10:19:56 | |
Does not conflict with. | 2024-09-16 10:19:59 | |
The provisions of the cloud view restrictions. | 2024-09-16 10:20:02 | |
On on public safety, so you can see. | 2024-09-16 10:20:05 | |
The assessment that we did on the screen. | 2024-09-16 10:20:08 | |
Restriction zone would be and whether. | 2024-09-16 10:20:11 | |
Proposed structure is going to be. | 2024-09-16 10:20:14 | |
More specifically, the building would be set. | 2024-09-16 10:20:17 | |
Set back at least 30 feet from the. | 2024-09-16 10:20:20 | |
West to east horizontal Clearview restrictions. | 2024-09-16 10:20:23 | |
And 14 feet from the north to. | 2024-09-16 10:20:26 | |
Clearview Restriction zone. | 2024-09-16 10:20:29 | |
And as you can see, that's the assessment. | 2024-09-16 10:20:32 | |
That we did based off of that Clearview assessment. | 2024-09-16 10:20:35 | |
The second analysis that. | 2024-09-16 10:20:38 | |
City staff dead was the impact of. | 2024-09-16 10:20:41 | |
This proposed development. | 2024-09-16 10:20:44 | |
On through traffic. | 2024-09-16 10:20:47 | |
And pedestrian safety now on. | 2024-09-16 10:20:50 | |
Analysis also indicates that the proposed location of this. | 2024-09-16 10:20:53 | |
Onto traffic now. Conclusion. | 2024-09-16 10:20:59 | |
Was made based on their characteristics of the road. | 2024-09-16 10:21:02 | |
Intersection at West. | 2024-09-16 10:21:05 | |
And the lower length the proposed. | 2024-09-16 10:21:08 | |
Structure is set to maintain a reduced. | 2024-09-16 10:21:11 | |
Set back on the east side of the property. | 2024-09-16 10:21:14 | |
Adjacent to Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:21:17 | |
Such traffic impacts and pedestrians 50. | 2024-09-16 10:21:20 | |
Should be primarily evaluated based on connect. | 2024-09-16 10:21:23 | |
And access from the corner of. | 2024-09-16 10:21:26 | |
Traveling northbound to. | 2024-09-16 10:21:29 | |
Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:21:32 | |
And abruptly after 150. | 2024-09-16 10:21:35 | |
Feet. So it's. It's not a connecting interface. | 2024-09-16 10:21:38 | |
On Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:21:41 | |
This suggests that the traffic to and from the corner. | 2024-09-16 10:21:44 | |
Delaware Lane to the northbound. | 2024-09-16 10:21:47 | |
Off Westmore Rd. Which? | 2024-09-16 10:21:50 | |
Be largely limited to generated. | 2024-09-16 10:21:53 | |
By two properties located at. | 2024-09-16 10:21:56 | |
On the east side of the applicants property, now these. | 2024-09-16 10:21:59 | |
Properties can be seen 49. | 2024-09-16 10:22:02 | |
11 S and 4920. | 2024-09-16 10:22:05 | |
Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:22:08 | |
Would be the the two neighboring. | 2024-09-16 10:22:11 | |
Properties where traffic would be generated because it's. | 2024-09-16 10:22:14 | |
Not a connecting thoroughfare now. | 2024-09-16 10:22:17 | |
Given that this portion of the traveling. | 2024-09-16 10:22:20 | |
Primarily sets as access for these two. | 2024-09-16 10:22:23 | |
Neighboring properties. City staff. | 2024-09-16 10:22:26 | |
Determined that the proposed structure would not. | 2024-09-16 10:22:29 | |
Can we affect through traffic? | 2024-09-16 10:22:32 | |
And safety in a manner that is detrimental to. | 2024-09-16 10:22:35 | |
To the public interest, so that. | 2024-09-16 10:22:38 | |
That's the nature of the road, that. | 2024-09-16 10:22:41 | |
Staff also shows us an exhibit. | 2024-09-16 10:22:44 | |
Now the next thing for city staff. | 2024-09-16 10:22:47 | |
Was to assess the application. | 2024-09-16 10:22:50 | |
Based off of the state. | 2024-09-16 10:22:53 | |
Criteria of the five part test variant. | 2024-09-16 10:22:56 | |
Now the first one is to. | 2024-09-16 10:22:59 | |
Describing what hardship is going to occur. | 2024-09-16 10:23:02 | |
The applicant is not granted this very authority. | 2024-09-16 10:23:05 | |
Exceptionally. | 2024-09-16 10:23:08 | |
Demonstration of unique circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:23:11 | |
Or an unreasonable hardship. | 2024-09-16 10:23:14 | |
In it exceptionally hard to comply with the zoning. | 2024-09-16 10:23:17 | |
The applicant submitted through site plan. | 2024-09-16 10:23:20 | |
To demonstrate their burden of proof. | 2024-09-16 10:23:23 | |
The applicant contends. | 2024-09-16 10:23:26 | |
That with the required. | 2024-09-16 10:23:29 | |
On a side set back the footprints of their. | 2024-09-16 10:23:32 | |
Home would extend 3 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:23:35 | |
Outside of the permanent set back. | 2024-09-16 10:23:38 | |
Now they are. They submitted a site plan to show. | 2024-09-16 10:23:41 | |
How compliant compliance with the city. | 2024-09-16 10:23:44 | |
The ordinance would look like a technical review. | 2024-09-16 10:23:48 | |
Of the applicable zoning laws indicate that. | 2024-09-16 10:23:50 | |
Compliance with the corner site set back. | 2024-09-16 10:23:53 | |
Would require either a modification. | 2024-09-16 10:23:56 | |
You know the home buyers chosen building design. | 2024-09-16 10:23:59 | |
Or shipped in the building envelope westward. | 2024-09-16 10:24:02 | |
Of the subject property. | 2024-09-16 10:24:05 | |
This case would also fail to meet the site. | 2024-09-16 10:24:09 | |
Set back on the West side of the property. | 2024-09-16 10:24:11 | |
Now, while the first alternative. | 2024-09-16 10:24:14 | |
Addresses a self-imposed limitation. | 2024-09-16 10:24:17 | |
Due to design preferences, the second. | 2024-09-16 10:24:21 | |
Alternative would not allow compliance with the. | 2024-09-16 10:24:24 | |
Set back requirement on both the east. | 2024-09-16 10:24:27 | |
Sides of the property it is important. | 2024-09-16 10:24:30 | |
To consider that although the hardship. | 2024-09-16 10:24:33 | |
Condition cited by the applicant is not unique. | 2024-09-16 10:24:36 | |
To this specific property. | 2024-09-16 10:24:39 | |
For granting this exception should be evaluated at. | 2024-09-16 10:24:42 | |
In the context of limitations. | 2024-09-16 10:24:45 | |
On building rights. | 2024-09-16 10:24:48 | |
Project that justification for. | 2024-09-16 10:24:51 | |
Convincingly presented by the applicant. | 2024-09-16 10:24:57 | |
During the peering now we. | 2024-09-16 10:25:00 | |
Describing how the property is different. | 2024-09-16 10:25:03 | |
From other properties within the vicinity. | 2024-09-16 10:25:06 | |
Now, regarding the presence of special circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:25:09 | |
Associated with the property or within the vicinity. | 2024-09-16 10:25:12 | |
The applicant has articulated that. | 2024-09-16 10:25:15 | |
Narrative that their property distinguishes itself. | 2024-09-16 10:25:18 | |
From other properties within the holiday peaks. | 2024-09-16 10:25:21 | |
Division by outlining the property. | 2024-09-16 10:25:24 | |
Characteristics Indian narrative now it is. | 2024-09-16 10:25:27 | |
Worth noting that the subject. | 2024-09-16 10:25:30 | |
Set similar size shape. | 2024-09-16 10:25:33 | |
Orientation characteristics. | 2024-09-16 10:25:36 | |
But that is directly across the street. | 2024-09-16 10:25:39 | |
In the subdivision to the South, which is large. | 2024-09-16 10:25:42 | |
Have indicated that log 10 which is. | 2024-09-16 10:25:48 | |
Adjacent property to the South. | 2024-09-16 10:25:51 | |
Would comply with all their set back requirements in. | 2024-09-16 10:25:54 | |
Including the prescribed standardized 20 feet corner. | 2024-09-16 10:25:57 | |
However. | 2024-09-16 10:26:00 | |
Significant characteristic relevant. | 2024-09-16 10:26:03 | |
Special circumstances that set. | 2024-09-16 10:26:06 | |
Property apart from this. | 2024-09-16 10:26:09 | |
Neighboring property is that. | 2024-09-16 10:26:12 | |
Is that the nature of their inter? | 2024-09-16 10:26:15 | |
Street that abuts the subject property. | 2024-09-16 10:26:18 | |
To the east is not a thoroughfare. | 2024-09-16 10:26:21 | |
Now the applicant submits that Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:26:24 | |
Does not continue as a. | 2024-09-16 10:26:27 | |
And terminate. | 2024-09-16 10:26:30 | |
To the end of the world, therefore, this distinction. | 2024-09-16 10:26:33 | |
Makes this subject a lot different. Incarcerated. | 2024-09-16 10:26:36 | |
From atypical corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:26:39 | |
Disregard the circumstance would enable them to. | 2024-09-16 10:26:42 | |
Comply with the requirements of a standard. | 2024-09-16 10:26:45 | |
Side yard set back instead of a corner side. | 2024-09-16 10:26:48 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 10:26:54 | |
Based off of this narrative and justification. | 2024-09-16 10:26:57 | |
Application provided by the applicant city. | 2024-09-16 10:27:00 | |
Staff acknowledges that the termination. | 2024-09-16 10:27:03 | |
Wrote and that result in traffic flow. | 2024-09-16 10:27:06 | |
Makes the subject property somewhat unique in. | 2024-09-16 10:27:09 | |
Comparison to other typical corner lots in the city. | 2024-09-16 10:27:12 | |
Because the flow of. | 2024-09-16 10:27:15 | |
Westmore Rd. terminates abruptly even before. | 2024-09-16 10:27:18 | |
It retreats the end of the. | 2024-09-16 10:27:21 | |
The subject property to the north. | 2024-09-16 10:27:24 | |
3 starters of the opinion that granted an exception. | 2024-09-16 10:27:27 | |
Are based off of this criteria. | 2024-09-16 10:27:30 | |
And to the ordinance requirement. | 2024-09-16 10:27:33 | |
On corner side setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:27:36 | |
Be carefully considered with emphasis on requiring. | 2024-09-16 10:27:39 | |
Compliance to side yard setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:27:42 | |
So in other words, what we're saying is that. | 2024-09-16 10:27:45 | |
The country is proposing that this property is unique. | 2024-09-16 10:27:48 | |
In terms of not being. | 2024-09-16 10:27:51 | |
Says using the normal corner site that. | 2024-09-16 10:27:54 | |
City staff is of the opinion that. | 2024-09-16 10:27:57 | |
They should be assessed using SIDR set back. | 2024-09-16 10:28:00 | |
Just like any other property in Holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:28:03 | |
Now, the third criteria is that. | 2024-09-16 10:28:06 | |
The applicant would have to describe benefits that. | 2024-09-16 10:28:09 | |
Other properties in the vicinity of the. | 2024-09-16 10:28:12 | |
Expense of the applicant without a variant. | 2024-09-16 10:28:15 | |
Now in demonstrating how granted. | 2024-09-16 10:28:18 | |
Necessary to the enjoyment of substantial. | 2024-09-16 10:28:21 | |
Property rights possessed by other properties. | 2024-09-16 10:28:24 | |
In that same district now that. | 2024-09-16 10:28:27 | |
Not really applied to this effect. | 2024-09-16 10:28:30 | |
As previously noted, was 10, which is 3. | 2024-09-16 10:28:33 | |
Across the street is the only property. | 2024-09-16 10:28:36 | |
Within the subdivision and neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:28:39 | |
That sheds comparable characteristics. | 2024-09-16 10:28:42 | |
With the subject property, however. | 2024-09-16 10:28:45 | |
Lord Ken does not enjoy exceptional benefits. | 2024-09-16 10:28:48 | |
Or property rights of the expensive. | 2024-09-16 10:28:51 | |
The applicant's property. | 2024-09-16 10:28:54 | |
That granted the variance to the applicant. | 2024-09-16 10:28:57 | |
Under this criteria. | 2024-09-16 10:29:00 | |
Be essential to the substantial enjoyment of the. | 2024-09-16 10:29:03 | |
Property rights and common privileges and. | 2024-09-16 10:29:06 | |
By other properties in this vicinity. | 2024-09-16 10:29:09 | |
The 4th criteria is for the applicant to this. | 2024-09-16 10:29:12 | |
Describe why the variance would not be a deviation. | 2024-09-16 10:29:15 | |
From the general purpose of City of Holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:29:18 | |
Development code concerning the. | 2024-09-16 10:29:21 | |
The general plan that are not contrary to the public interest. | 2024-09-16 10:29:25 | |
The ordinance provision. | 2024-09-16 10:29:27 | |
Pertaining to setbacks, subsection 13. | 2024-09-16 10:29:31 | |
Point 14.057. | 2024-09-16 10:29:33 | |
Corner sites which is found in section. | 2024-09-16 10:29:37 | |
13 point 14.056. | 2024-09-16 10:29:39 | |
Are not explicitly captured in the general plan. | 2024-09-16 10:29:42 | |
Now, while these setbacks do not sign. | 2024-09-16 10:29:45 | |
Impact the general provisions in the class. | 2024-09-16 10:29:48 | |
Discussion surrounding setbacks in Neighborhood Field. | 2024-09-16 10:29:52 | |
Will always remain. | 2024-09-16 10:29:54 | |
Significant to public interest concerns. | 2024-09-16 10:29:57 | |
On the one hand, site level development standards. | 2024-09-16 10:30:01 | |
And location of structures within single family residential residential residential. | 2024-09-16 10:30:04 | |
Neighborhoods do not constitute substantial. | 2024-09-16 10:30:07 | |
Deviation from the city's general development code. | 2024-09-16 10:30:10 | |
And city staff analysis indicates. | 2024-09-16 10:30:12 | |
That granted the variance would not negatively impact. | 2024-09-16 10:30:16 | |
The provision of the. | 2024-09-16 10:30:19 | |
General plan or the public? | 2024-09-16 10:30:22 | |
Interest, so therefore not the purpose. | 2024-09-16 10:30:25 | |
Of the ordinance specified for. | 2024-09-16 10:30:28 | |
Corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:30:30 | |
And the last criteria is for the applicant to describe. | 2024-09-16 10:30:34 | |
How the variance is fair and conformed? | 2024-09-16 10:30:37 | |
The general and overall intent of. | 2024-09-16 10:30:40 | |
Now in alignment with the general. | 2024-09-16 10:30:43 | |
Content of the zoning laws and. | 2024-09-16 10:30:46 | |
The supplementary evidence in this spatial analysis. | 2024-09-16 10:30:49 | |
Conducted by city staff shows that the request. | 2024-09-16 10:30:52 | |
That variant conforms to the overall intent of this. | 2024-09-16 10:30:55 | |
Zoning laws specifically pertaining to site. | 2024-09-16 10:30:58 | |
Setbacks the applicant proposed. | 2024-09-16 10:31:01 | |
I set back is going to meet. | 2024-09-16 10:31:04 | |
Side yard setbacks just like other properties. | 2024-09-16 10:31:07 | |
Now granting, the variance appears to be. | 2024-09-16 10:31:10 | |
To align with their intentions. Birth of the zoning order. | 2024-09-16 10:31:13 | |
Which seeks to promote equally important. | 2024-09-16 10:31:16 | |
Outcomes that protect traffic pedestrian safety. | 2024-09-16 10:31:19 | |
See and enhance cheesecake. | 2024-09-16 10:31:22 | |
1000 stock in the Community. | 2024-09-16 10:31:25 | |
Imagine the importance of finance in applying. | 2024-09-16 10:31:28 | |
Requirements from the city code. | 2024-09-16 10:31:31 | |
Finding the Purpose, Section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:31:34 | |
.050 which again. | 2024-09-16 10:31:37 | |
Advocates for variability and flexibility. | 2024-09-16 10:31:40 | |
Setbacks based off of the characteristics. | 2024-09-16 10:31:43 | |
Reduce equal outcomes now. | 2024-09-16 10:31:46 | |
Useful in rectifying disproportionate. | 2024-09-16 10:31:49 | |
Impact of applying uniform or. | 2024-09-16 10:31:52 | |
On the corner site setbacks for. | 2024-09-16 10:31:55 | |
A lot that unique. | 2024-09-16 10:31:58 | |
Characteristics in terms of being classified. | 2024-09-16 10:32:01 | |
At the corner site. Sit back now. City stop. | 2024-09-16 10:32:04 | |
Concludes that granting the variance to maintain the. | 2024-09-16 10:32:07 | |
12 feet side yard set back. | 2024-09-16 10:32:10 | |
Opposed to maintaining a ***** site set back. | 2024-09-16 10:32:13 | |
Would safeguard the fairness principles accommodate. | 2024-09-16 10:32:16 | |
While upholding the spirit of zoning infants. | 2024-09-16 10:32:19 | |
Conclusion from the city staff. | 2024-09-16 10:32:22 | |
Technical review of the city code. | 2024-09-16 10:32:25 | |
Process of the properties characteristic in context. | 2024-09-16 10:32:28 | |
And the adjoining roadway configuration as described. | 2024-09-16 10:32:31 | |
Shows that. | 2024-09-16 10:32:34 | |
Granted that 6.6 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:32:37 | |
Corner sites set by friends appears to be elite. | 2024-09-16 10:32:40 | |
Interested solution to upholding. | 2024-09-16 10:32:43 | |
The spirit of zoning. | 2024-09-16 10:32:46 | |
Line in meeting the other. | 2024-09-16 10:32:49 | |
Set back requirement which would be the. | 2024-09-16 10:32:52 | |
Set back now discussions regard. | 2024-09-16 10:32:55 | |
Request should be moderated by the abuse officer today. | 2024-09-16 10:33:01 | |
By examining the language of the code. | 2024-09-16 10:33:04 | |
As specified in section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:33:07 | |
050 and section 13 point. | 2024-09-16 10:33:10 | |
14.054. | 2024-09-16 10:33:13 | |
Narrative and the City staff recommendation. | 2024-09-16 10:33:16 | |
As well as their proceedings from there. | 2024-09-16 10:33:19 | |
Public hearing. | 2024-09-16 10:33:22 | |
From the city staff. | 2024-09-16 10:33:22 | |
Perspective and the subject. | 2024-09-16 10:33:25 | |
From the city staff perspective. | 2024-09-16 10:33:28 | |
Perspective The subject property. | 2024-09-16 10:33:31 | |
Unique circumstances to be treated differently. | 2024-09-16 10:33:34 | |
Friendly from a standard corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:33:37 | |
And the variance request. | 2024-09-16 10:33:40 | |
Justified part test approval and therefore. | 2024-09-16 10:33:43 | |
Approval is recommended by city staff. | 2024-09-16 10:33:46 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:33:49 | |
Question on on the Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:33:52 | |
On the dead end likelihood. | 2024-09-16 10:33:55 | |
Is that we'll never go through? Is that right? Because on the. | 2024-09-16 10:33:58 | |
End of. | 2024-09-16 10:34:01 | |
That street there is a another subdivision. | 2024-09-16 10:34:04 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 10:34:07 | |
It's not likely that Westmore Rd. will be a thorough. | 2024-09-16 10:34:10 | |
Going north, is that right? | 2024-09-16 10:34:13 | |
Not that I can not. Not that I can not. Likely, no. | 2024-09-16 10:34:16 | |
Likely, yeah, Not likely. Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:34:19 | |
Applicant, thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:34:22 | |
Before I go to the store and I'm. | 2024-09-16 10:34:25 | |
First I'd like. | 2024-09-16 10:34:31 | |
Existing staff for your investigation through analysis. | 2024-09-16 10:34:34 | |
I'd like to be brief. | 2024-09-16 10:34:37 | |
The main argument that we have is that. | 2024-09-16 10:34:40 | |
While we recognize that. | 2024-09-16 10:34:43 | |
Sense this lot would be considered a corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:34:46 | |
In practice, it doesn't meet. | 2024-09-16 10:34:49 | |
The necessary circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:34:52 | |
That give Corny lots of more restrictive setbacks and a stand. | 2024-09-16 10:34:55 | |
Standard step back, if that. | 2024-09-16 10:34:58 | |
Showing the exhibit that shows the whole. | 2024-09-16 10:35:01 | |
Neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:35:04 | |
One thing I'd like to point out is that we have. | 2024-09-16 10:35:07 | |
Same property interest in this lot that is. | 2024-09-16 10:35:10 | |
Indicated in the red is the one that's directly. | 2024-09-16 10:35:13 | |
Which was Lot 10. | 2024-09-16 10:35:16 | |
We're not asking to make any changes. | 2024-09-16 10:35:20 | |
Or ask for any variances on that lot. | 2024-09-16 10:35:22 | |
Consider that that meets those special exceptions. | 2024-09-16 10:35:25 | |
Or, excuse me, special circumstances that require. | 2024-09-16 10:35:28 | |
Cornered lots to have a more. | 2024-09-16 10:35:31 | |
Corner side. We understand that that exists. | 2024-09-16 10:35:34 | |
The truth thoroughfare that both streets function. | 2024-09-16 10:35:37 | |
Completely out of the corner and why you would want to. | 2024-09-16 10:35:41 | |
City would want to have a more. | 2024-09-16 10:35:43 | |
Restrictive set back on that side. | 2024-09-16 10:35:46 | |
The case is not the same on the subject. | 2024-09-16 10:35:50 | |
Property this road wall. | 2024-09-16 10:35:53 | |
Exists on two sides of the. | 2024-09-16 10:35:55 | |
And where we come to the conclusion that the text. | 2024-09-16 10:35:59 | |
Corner side. | 2024-09-16 10:36:02 | |
Continue all the way through for the whole property. | 2024-09-16 10:36:05 | |
It terminates about 25 feet before the end. | 2024-09-16 10:36:07 | |
End of the lot and it functions only as a street. | 2024-09-16 10:36:11 | |
For one or five. | 2024-09-16 10:36:14 | |
Possibly two other properties so because. | 2024-09-16 10:36:17 | |
We have the same size as other lots in the community. | 2024-09-16 10:36:20 | |
In this particular subdivision, we're almost identical in. | 2024-09-16 10:36:23 | |
Side and in width we. | 2024-09-16 10:36:26 | |
We would hope that the city could recognize. | 2024-09-16 10:36:29 | |
That. | 2024-09-16 10:36:32 | |
Standard side yard setbacks should be applied in. | 2024-09-16 10:36:35 | |
Instead of taking the very technical approach that this is a corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:36:38 | |
Where in practice it doesn't meet any of those. | 2024-09-16 10:36:41 | |
Special circumstances that would require. | 2024-09-16 10:36:44 | |
Additional imposition on building sites I appreciate. | 2024-09-16 10:36:47 | |
Take your time and different questions. Yeah, I have a question. What 10? | 2024-09-16 10:36:50 | |
So it is the. | 2024-09-16 10:36:53 | |
Building area. | 2024-09-16 10:36:56 | |
The building plan the same as other laws. | 2024-09-16 10:36:59 | |
Why wouldn't are you reducing the building area? | 2024-09-16 10:37:02 | |
For lot 10 by having the. | 2024-09-16 10:37:05 | |
Corner lot set back. | 2024-09-16 10:37:08 | |
In compliance of the 20 foot. | 2024-09-16 10:37:11 | |
Cornwall set back. | 2024-09-16 10:37:14 | |
It would be reduced to some degree, I mean, I guess. | 2024-09-16 10:37:17 | |
The city's building areas of 30%. | 2024-09-16 10:37:20 | |
But I guess it wouldn't change what typical. | 2024-09-16 10:37:23 | |
Building area would necessarily be, but it would. | 2024-09-16 10:37:26 | |
Change the way that you could Orient a home on the property. | 2024-09-16 10:37:29 | |
So we recognize that we would be limited on how we could Orient. | 2024-09-16 10:37:32 | |
A home on Lot 10? Well, why is it? | 2024-09-16 10:37:35 | |
Different on lot 10. How are you? Are you able to Orient? | 2024-09-16 10:37:38 | |
Home differently on lot 10 than. | 2024-09-16 10:37:41 | |
5. | 2024-09-16 10:37:44 | |
Current. | 2024-09-16 10:37:47 | |
No, they would be identical. | 2024-09-16 10:37:50 | |
Yeah, those two lots would be identical. | 2024-09-16 10:37:53 | |
So on lot 10. | 2024-09-16 10:37:56 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 10:37:59 | |
You're complying with the corner set. | 2024-09-16 10:38:02 | |
Back, yes, but. | 2024-09-16 10:38:05 | |
The building right, The building plan. | 2024-09-16 10:38:08 | |
Is the. | 2024-09-16 10:38:11 | |
Fame as all the other lots. | 2024-09-16 10:38:14 | |
Or is it reduced? I'm just trying to understand that. | 2024-09-16 10:38:17 | |
Sure, I guess the. | 2024-09-16 10:38:20 | |
That we're making is while we have the same. | 2024-09-16 10:38:23 | |
Lot size and characteristics. | 2024-09-16 10:38:26 | |
For lot 105 and 1:10. | 2024-09-16 10:38:29 | |
We're asking it to be recognized that. | 2024-09-16 10:38:32 | |
105 has a different setting circumstance. | 2024-09-16 10:38:35 | |
In that it doesn't have any thoroughfare. | 2024-09-16 10:38:38 | |
But I'm just trying to understand that the difference. | 2024-09-16 10:38:41 | |
I mean it's reducing the home size. | 2024-09-16 10:38:44 | |
The building area is that. | 2024-09-16 10:38:47 | |
Different on lot. | 2024-09-16 10:38:50 | |
10110. | 2024-09-16 10:38:53 | |
105 because we're saying that, well, we. | 2024-09-16 10:38:56 | |
We don't want to reduce the size of the building. | 2024-09-16 10:38:59 | |
Area on lot 105, that's one of the. | 2024-09-16 10:39:02 | |
Hardships, right? Sure. | 2024-09-16 10:39:05 | |
We recognize that lot 10 functions. | 2024-09-16 10:39:08 | |
Typical corner. | 2024-09-16 10:39:11 | |
Meets all of those standards that in zoning code. | 2024-09-16 10:39:14 | |
Require that there is more restrictive set back on top. | 2024-09-16 10:39:17 | |
We are saying for that. | 2024-09-16 10:39:20 | |
Same size. They should have the same set back unless they. | 2024-09-16 10:39:23 | |
Specific circumstance that occurred, that's the. | 2024-09-16 10:39:26 | |
Circumstance occurs on lot 10 and therefore. | 2024-09-16 10:39:29 | |
We recognize that that may have a more restrictive set back. | 2024-09-16 10:39:32 | |
That specific circumstance doesn't practically function online. | 2024-09-16 10:39:35 | |
105 and therefore we would suggest that we. | 2024-09-16 10:39:38 | |
Should be Yeah, I understand that. But my question is. | 2024-09-16 10:39:41 | |
If you were granted a very unwanted. | 2024-09-16 10:39:44 | |
1:05 with that home size. | 2024-09-16 10:39:47 | |
The design be the same as what? | 2024-09-16 10:39:50 | |
Is going in on lot 110. | 2024-09-16 10:39:53 | |
With the. | 2024-09-16 10:39:56 | |
Compliant with the corner block. | 2024-09-16 10:39:59 | |
Set back. That's my question. | 2024-09-16 10:40:01 | |
It would, it would not be. | 2024-09-16 10:40:05 | |
In home size or. | 2024-09-16 10:40:08 | |
The width would be limited. | 2024-09-16 10:40:11 | |
One 10110 a little more than. | 2024-09-16 10:40:14 | |
What would exist right now and want to exist on one? | 2024-09-16 10:40:17 | |
105 granting this variance OK. | 2024-09-16 10:40:20 | |
That's what I need to understand. | 2024-09-16 10:40:23 | |
All right. | 2024-09-16 10:40:26 | |
I have no other questions. Thank you. Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:40:29 | |
City any more questions any? | 2024-09-16 10:40:32 | |
Just. | 2024-09-16 10:40:35 | |
Separate note, I've received some communication from our core. | 2024-09-16 10:40:38 | |
Courtroom if anyone in here is for court. | 2024-09-16 10:40:41 | |
Justice Court, this is not this room. | 2024-09-16 10:40:44 | |
The next one over. | 2024-09-16 10:40:47 | |
OK. | 2024-09-16 10:40:50 | |
Any other comments? | 2024-09-16 10:40:53 | |
Please. | 2024-09-16 10:41:02 | |
State your name and address for the record please. | 2024-09-16 10:41:05 | |
My name is Dan Brisbane and. | 2024-09-16 10:41:08 | |
And Sheila states lot. | 2024-09-16 10:41:11 | |
One at the end of Metamorph. | 2024-09-16 10:41:14 | |
Or Wetmore Rd. So my question is. | 2024-09-16 10:41:17 | |
What house is going in there? | 2024-09-16 10:41:20 | |
We haven't seen anything that would tell us the shape. | 2024-09-16 10:41:23 | |
And size and characteristics of the home. | 2024-09-16 10:41:26 | |
They're proposing and I don't know if they're. | 2024-09-16 10:41:29 | |
All the same home or. | 2024-09-16 10:41:32 | |
They will have little changes here in here. | 2024-09-16 10:41:35 | |
There how tall they will be and. | 2024-09-16 10:41:38 | |
So we would like to see. | 2024-09-16 10:41:41 | |
Going in so that we can understand. | 2024-09-16 10:41:44 | |
What our neighbors are going to be and. | 2024-09-16 10:41:47 | |
Where they're gonna live? Yeah, mitigations. | 2024-09-16 10:41:50 | |
Yeah, I can have Mr. Gamble. | 2024-09-16 10:41:53 | |
Answer that question. However, the purpose of this. | 2024-09-16 10:41:56 | |
Hearing is. | 2024-09-16 10:41:59 | |
On a specified. | 2024-09-16 10:42:02 | |
Issue and that is whether set back is. | 2024-09-16 10:42:05 | |
There's a variance for a set back. | 2024-09-16 10:42:08 | |
Nothing to do with, you know, the building plans itself. | 2024-09-16 10:42:11 | |
They have building plans and they want to. | 2024-09-16 10:42:17 | |
Exercise the right to do those building plans. | 2024-09-16 10:42:20 | |
But Mr. Gamblers, you have. | 2024-09-16 10:42:23 | |
Answer his question. | 2024-09-16 10:42:26 | |
Follow this OK. | 2024-09-16 10:42:29 | |
How many times? | 2024-09-16 10:42:32 | |
Exactly. | 2024-09-16 10:42:38 | |
As we mentioned, we haven't committed a building permit because. | 2024-09-16 10:42:42 | |
Will not. | 2024-09-16 10:42:48 | |
Understood and all. | 2024-09-16 10:42:56 | |
Rack, there's no very good question. | 2024-09-16 10:43:00 | |
My understanding was that. | 2024-09-16 10:43:09 | |
They would all be on Delaware. | 2024-09-16 10:43:12 | |
Facing Delaware and Delaware address. | 2024-09-16 10:43:15 | |
You're saying that this particular home. | 2024-09-16 10:43:18 | |
Would be a Westmore address is an. | 2024-09-16 10:43:21 | |
Entry from Westmore? Or would the entry does a lot be from? | 2024-09-16 10:43:24 | |
Delaware. | 2024-09-16 10:43:27 | |
So you too. | 2024-09-16 10:43:30 | |
On the flight, planes included right away. | 2024-09-16 10:43:33 | |
OK, but the front door would be on West. | 2024-09-16 10:43:42 | |
And it would have a Westmore address. | 2024-09-16 10:43:48 | |
I'm not sure about that. | 2024-09-16 10:43:51 | |
Introduced early on in this meeting. | 2024-09-16 10:44:03 | |
Clarify that address that was submitted from the. | 2024-09-16 10:44:06 | |
How do I suggest? | 2024-09-16 10:44:15 | |
And it probably isn't a time or place. | 2024-09-16 10:44:21 | |
That at dead end. | 2024-09-16 10:44:24 | |
Who is going to own that? Take care of it. | 2024-09-16 10:44:27 | |
Yeah, I don't believe that's been decided, although I do notice. | 2024-09-16 10:44:30 | |
The applicant has mentioned that possibility. | 2024-09-16 10:44:33 | |
But. | 2024-09-16 10:44:36 | |
To be determined by the city and the applicant at a later. | 2024-09-16 10:44:39 | |
And I'm sure that you'll be involved in that as well. | 2024-09-16 10:44:42 | |
In that discussion, but that is not the issue for. | 2024-09-16 10:44:45 | |
Day. Yep. Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:44:48 | |
Yes. | 2024-09-16 10:44:51 | |
This guy told me. | 2024-09-16 10:44:54 | |
Your name and address 4412 S. | 2024-09-16 10:44:57 | |
Briarwood Circle. This is on the issue. | 2024-09-16 10:45:00 | |
Right before this one I might have missed. | 2024-09-16 10:45:03 | |
Yeah, you did. Yeah. Well, no, I was here, but. | 2024-09-16 10:45:06 | |
We didn't open it up to discussion. Yeah. | 2024-09-16 10:45:09 | |
And I've got a bunch of angry neighbors texting me saying how? | 2024-09-16 10:45:12 | |
Did they pass this without a forum to speak? | 2024-09-16 10:45:15 | |
About it building the big old house on the side. | 2024-09-16 10:45:18 | |
Sidewalk and I'm wondering if if there's a four. | 2024-09-16 10:45:21 | |
Where we're going to be able to vote or if we can push that back. | 2024-09-16 10:45:24 | |
To have some time to discuss. | 2024-09-16 10:45:27 | |
The house directly South of that property. | 2024-09-16 10:45:30 | |
And so they'll be 8 feet from us, which is which is close but with this. | 2024-09-16 10:45:33 | |
Other variants to 28% increase. | 2024-09-16 10:45:36 | |
Being closer to the sidewalk for two-story. | 2024-09-16 10:45:39 | |
That's pretty big, yeah. | 2024-09-16 10:45:42 | |
There probably is no more hearing. | 2024-09-16 10:45:45 | |
I mean, there may be other avenues, but. | 2024-09-16 10:45:48 | |
There will not be another hearing on that by. | 2024-09-16 10:45:51 | |
Internally by the city. | 2024-09-16 10:45:54 | |
OK, Mr. McMurray, I'll be happy to speak with him now. | 2024-09-16 10:45:57 | |
In the hall, if you'd like. All right, thank you. Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:46:00 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:46:03 | |
All right. | 2024-09-16 10:46:06 | |
Yes. | 2024-09-16 10:46:09 | |
My name is Gordon Seibert. I own the property. | 2024-09-16 10:46:15 | |
Directly South of. | 2024-09-16 10:46:18 | |
Lot 10. Proposed Lot 10. | 2024-09-16 10:46:21 | |
And I guess I'm still confused as to. | 2024-09-16 10:46:24 | |
Why? I believe that we've been told that they're not. | 2024-09-16 10:46:27 | |
Gonna ask for a variance on lot 10. | 2024-09-16 10:46:30 | |
Why are they asking one for lot 5 other than? | 2024-09-16 10:46:33 | |
More land. | 2024-09-16 10:46:36 | |
I don't get it. | 2024-09-16 10:46:36 | |
Mr. Bruce. | 2024-09-16 10:46:39 | |
Gmail. | 2024-09-16 10:46:42 | |
Block heavy Dougie, always the circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:46:45 | |
How are they not both sides? | 2024-09-16 10:47:03 | |
How are they not both corner sites? | 2024-09-16 10:47:06 | |
Our concept here is. | 2024-09-16 10:47:09 | |
The road is not continued through the entire way. | 2024-09-16 10:47:12 | |
Last time. | 2024-09-16 10:47:18 | |
Where we would have those traffic. | 2024-09-16 10:47:21 | |
Those things you know just from all. | 2024-09-16 10:47:24 | |
OK. Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:47:30 | |
Any other comments? | 2024-09-16 10:47:36 | |
Alright, I'm gonna need. | 2024-09-16 10:47:39 | |
Eat a few minutes so if you were. | 2024-09-16 10:47:42 | |
I wanted to state something for the record though, yes. | 2024-09-16 10:47:45 | |
It's never more I think that. | 2024-09-16 10:47:48 | |
One thing that should be made clear to the general public. | 2024-09-16 10:47:51 | |
Is that the applicant is not. | 2024-09-16 10:47:54 | |
Requesting to gain more land. | 2024-09-16 10:47:57 | |
Or encourage into the public right away. | 2024-09-16 10:48:00 | |
They're asking for the interpretation. | 2024-09-16 10:48:03 | |
City ordinance. | 2024-09-16 10:48:06 | |
To assess in the setbacks of the property. | 2024-09-16 10:48:09 | |
Now basically what they're saying is they're request. | 2024-09-16 10:48:12 | |
That the city assess. | 2024-09-16 10:48:15 | |
The east side of the property using a standard. | 2024-09-16 10:48:18 | |
Side yard set back which they're going to comply with. | 2024-09-16 10:48:21 | |
Instead of a corner instead of a corner. | 2024-09-16 10:48:24 | |
Sight set back. Thank you Mr. before Things. | 2024-09-16 10:48:27 | |
Yeah. Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:48:30 | |
Right. | 2024-09-16 10:48:30 | |
If you would just give me a few minutes. | 2024-09-16 10:48:33 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:48:36 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 10:49:34 | |
OK, the secret. | 2024-09-16 10:49:40 | |
Is everything OK? Yeah, yeah. | 2024-09-16 10:49:46 | |
Alright. | 2024-09-16 10:50:10 | |
Thank you. Thanks for that time. | 2024-09-16 10:50:13 | |
So the. | 2024-09-16 10:50:16 | |
I will have a written opinion of. | 2024-09-16 10:50:19 | |
That will supersede anything I say for the record today. | 2024-09-16 10:50:22 | |
And I'll provide that written opinion to. | 2024-09-16 10:50:25 | |
City and to the applicant, hopefully. | 2024-09-16 10:50:28 | |
With him, well, I within 5 business days I'll have. | 2024-09-16 10:50:31 | |
You a written opinion, but I am prepared to. | 2024-09-16 10:50:34 | |
At least verbally state for the record. | 2024-09-16 10:50:37 | |
Decision, but again, remember. | 2024-09-16 10:50:40 | |
Written opinion supersedes what I say. | 2024-09-16 10:50:43 | |
Today, so the holiday height. | 2024-09-16 10:50:46 | |
In LLC file a request for variance. | 2024-09-16 10:50:49 | |
Under section 13.14, point 05. | 2024-09-16 10:50:52 | |
Seven of the city code of holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:50:55 | |
Utah requiring a minimum set back of. | 2024-09-16 10:50:58 | |
20 feet on the east side of the applicants property was. | 2024-09-16 10:51:01 | |
Characterized under the code. | 2024-09-16 10:51:04 | |
Side on a public St. private road. | 2024-09-16 10:51:07 | |
Or private lane. The applicant wants a variance tool. | 2024-09-16 10:51:10 | |
Allow the east side of applicants probably have a minimum. | 2024-09-16 10:51:13 | |
Set back of 12.4 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:51:16 | |
Which would be equivalent to a regular. | 2024-09-16 10:51:19 | |
Fact that is not a corner side. | 2024-09-16 10:51:22 | |
Section 13.1. Point. | 2024-09-16 10:51:25 | |
5-6 of the code like correct so far. | 2024-09-16 10:51:28 | |
OK, ah. | 2024-09-16 10:51:31 | |
So under the state criteria. | 2024-09-16 10:51:37 | |
If applicant is required to meet the corner, step back. | 2024-09-16 10:51:40 | |
On applicants property as prescribed. | 2024-09-16 10:51:43 | |
13.14 Point 057. | 2024-09-16 10:51:46 | |
Applicant would be unable to build the. | 2024-09-16 10:51:49 | |
Building designs similar to other properties in the subdivision. | 2024-09-16 10:51:52 | |
Can shift at the building envelope W it could not come. | 2024-09-16 10:51:58 | |
Plywood the set back requirements on the West side of the app. | 2024-09-16 10:52:01 | |
Property, so the unreasonable. | 2024-09-16 10:52:04 | |
Hardship is limitation on the applicants. | 2024-09-16 10:52:07 | |
N. | 2024-09-16 10:52:10 | |
The opposite property. | 2024-09-16 10:52:13 | |
Uh. | 2024-09-16 10:52:16 | |
The special circumstance attached. | 2024-09-16 10:52:19 | |
Applicants property is that limited? | 2024-09-16 10:52:22 | |
And the pedestrian traffic. | 2024-09-16 10:52:25 | |
Streets, unlike regular cross streets, contemplate. | 2024-09-16 10:52:28 | |
By the code Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:52:31 | |
Dead ends and does not. | 2024-09-16 10:52:34 | |
Applicants property with more. | 2024-09-16 10:52:37 | |
Road will likely never be a thoroughfare. | 2024-09-16 10:52:40 | |
That's the only public benefit of what's more. | 2024-09-16 10:52:43 | |
Road along applicant property is. | 2024-09-16 10:52:46 | |
For applicants property and other property. | 2024-09-16 10:52:49 | |
Properties on the east side of Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:52:52 | |
Another subdivision. | 2024-09-16 10:52:55 | |
Limited use of Westmore Rd. is different from most corners. | 2024-09-16 10:52:58 | |
Sides that need clear vision do do. | 2024-09-16 10:53:01 | |
Vehicular and pedestrian clap. | 2024-09-16 10:53:04 | |
Without. | 2024-09-16 10:53:07 | |
Variance. The applicant will not enjoy the building, right? | 2024-09-16 10:53:10 | |
Possessed by other property in the same zone. | 2024-09-16 10:53:13 | |
Must have to mention a lot. | 2024-09-16 10:53:16 | |
110 The applicant. | 2024-09-16 10:53:19 | |
Has acknowledged that. | 2024-09-16 10:53:22 | |
Of vehicular traffic on lot 110 is different than. | 2024-09-16 10:53:25 | |
105 and therefore it will comply. | 2024-09-16 10:53:28 | |
Why with that dead corner lot requirement online? | 2024-09-16 10:53:31 | |
110. | 2024-09-16 10:53:34 | |
Uh, so GRA. | 2024-09-16 10:53:34 | |
Variance will not be contrary to public interest. | 2024-09-16 10:53:37 | |
Due to the limited use of Westmore Rd. North. | 2024-09-16 10:53:40 | |
Found requiring regular side set back. | 2024-09-16 10:53:43 | |
The greater corner by your cut back. | 2024-09-16 10:53:46 | |
Would not impact. | 2024-09-16 10:53:49 | |
Public safety or clear? | 2024-09-16 10:53:52 | |
Restrictions that has been represented. | 2024-09-16 10:53:55 | |
By the city so. | 2024-09-16 10:53:58 | |
The code. | 2024-09-16 10:54:01 | |
Is instruction is to be flexible. | 2024-09-16 10:54:04 | |
Produce equal outcome that is relevant. | 2024-09-16 10:54:07 | |
With uniform set back standards. | 2024-09-16 10:54:10 | |
Disproportionately affect properties with unique characteristics. | 2024-09-16 10:54:13 | |
Granting a variance to. | 2024-09-16 10:54:16 | |
Financial justice is done while I'll pull the. | 2024-09-16 10:54:19 | |
In the spirit of the zoning ordinance. | 2024-09-16 10:54:22 | |
So it is determined that. | 2024-09-16 10:54:25 | |
The applicant has met. | 2024-09-16 10:54:28 | |
The five conditions. | 2024-09-16 10:54:31 | |
Justifying. | 2024-09-16 10:54:34 | |
A variant. | 2024-09-16 10:54:37 | |
Ordinarily, the applicant is granted a variance for applicants. | 2024-09-16 10:54:40 | |
Property That's being Law 105. | 2024-09-16 10:54:43 | |
From the. | 2024-09-16 10:54:46 | |
13.14 Point 057. | 2024-09-16 10:54:49 | |
Of the code as follows, the east side set back about. | 2024-09-16 10:54:52 | |
Applicants property shall be a minimum of 12.4. | 2024-09-16 10:54:55 | |
That's the regular side. | 2024-09-16 10:54:58 | |
Rather than the 20 feet required for. | 2024-09-16 10:55:01 | |
Corner side under section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:55:04 | |
4.057 of the code. | 2024-09-16 10:55:07 | |
These are those correct? OK. | 2024-09-16 10:55:11 | |
Applicant shall comply with all. | 2024-09-16 10:55:13 | |
Applicable provisions of the code include. | 2024-09-16 10:55:17 | |
Secured securing the required building permit. | 2024-09-16 10:55:20 | |
Any questions? | 2024-09-16 10:55:22 | |
OK. Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:55:25 | |
There be no further business. This meeting is adjourned. | 2024-09-16 10:55:29 |
* you need to log in to manage your favorites
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Now, this flexibility is particularly. | 2024-09-16 09:54:40 | |
Relevant when the uniform setbacks fund that. | 2024-09-16 09:54:43 | |
Disproportionately affect properties with. | 2024-09-16 09:54:46 | |
Unique shape and characteristics. | 2024-09-16 09:54:49 | |
Belief that granted the variance to maintain. | 2024-09-16 09:54:52 | |
The proposed 25.25 feet set back. | 2024-09-16 09:54:55 | |
That would be key to ensuring that the fairness. | 2024-09-16 09:54:58 | |
Principle is accommodated while upholding the. | 2024-09-16 09:55:01 | |
Spirit of the zoning intent. | 2024-09-16 09:55:04 | |
Recommendations City staff concluded that a big. | 2024-09-16 09:55:07 | |
Based off of the technical review of the city code. | 2024-09-16 09:55:10 | |
Of the geospatial characteristics of the context. | 2024-09-16 09:55:13 | |
Granting the 7.2 variant. | 2024-09-16 09:55:16 | |
For the front yard appears to be the. | 2024-09-16 09:55:19 | |
Least intrusive solution to upholding the. | 2024-09-16 09:55:22 | |
Period of zoning as outlined in Section 30. | 2024-09-16 09:55:25 | |
3 point 14.050 now. | 2024-09-16 09:55:28 | |
Discussions regarding denials. | 2024-09-16 09:55:31 | |
Of this case should be moderated by the administration. | 2024-09-16 09:55:34 | |
Cities appeals here in officer by examining. | 2024-09-16 09:55:37 | |
The language of the city code the applicants. | 2024-09-16 09:55:40 | |
Narrative to be presented to us stuff. | 2024-09-16 09:55:43 | |
Recommendation and the proceedings from the public here. | 2024-09-16 09:55:46 | |
As well as other submissions that I received here. | 2024-09-16 09:55:49 | |
From the city staff's perspective. | 2024-09-16 09:55:52 | |
The subject property possesses unique characteristics. | 2024-09-16 09:55:55 | |
From others within the vicinity. | 2024-09-16 09:55:58 | |
I would circle and requiring compliance with the city. | 2024-09-16 09:56:01 | |
Code presents an unreasonable hardship. | 2024-09-16 09:56:04 | |
This variance request. | 2024-09-16 09:56:07 | |
Seems to pass the five part test. | 2024-09-16 09:56:10 | |
For variance standards and city staff, Richard. | 2024-09-16 09:56:13 | |
Approval. Thank you. Thank. | 2024-09-16 09:56:16 | |
Before I have a question for you. | 2024-09-16 09:56:19 | |
In regards to the special circumstance. | 2024-09-16 09:56:22 | |
You indicated that. | 2024-09-16 09:56:25 | |
At the rectangular shape. | 2024-09-16 09:56:28 | |
Lot is being assessed relative to irregular sheep. | 2024-09-16 09:56:31 | |
Plot within the cul-de-sac. | 2024-09-16 09:56:34 | |
Elongated with pie shaped front, Yeah. | 2024-09-16 09:56:37 | |
Mentioned orientation, will you expand on what? | 2024-09-16 09:56:40 | |
Is that an irregular orientation or what do you? | 2024-09-16 09:56:43 | |
Referring to there And why is that? | 2024-09-16 09:56:46 | |
Special or unique to this property? | 2024-09-16 09:56:49 | |
Yeah, that'd be great. | 2024-09-16 09:56:52 | |
Yeah, so ask you to. | 2024-09-16 09:56:55 | |
But but. | 2024-09-16 09:56:58 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 09:57:01 | |
The different properties within the. | 2024-09-16 09:57:04 | |
That's why I would circle. | 2024-09-16 09:57:07 | |
You are pretty nerd according to you. | 2024-09-16 09:57:10 | |
You revolve? I think so. | 2024-09-16 09:57:13 | |
That means that on the rear side of the property is. | 2024-09-16 09:57:16 | |
Large and it taper to the front. | 2024-09-16 09:57:19 | |
Now, according to Studio Holiday. | 2024-09-16 09:57:22 | |
Set back to comment. | 2024-09-16 09:57:25 | |
We are supposed to use that with. | 2024-09-16 09:57:28 | |
Property determined side of that. | 2024-09-16 09:57:31 | |
And then after we do know that. | 2024-09-16 09:57:34 | |
Yeah, that's 14. | 2024-09-16 09:57:37 | |
It's working. | 2024-09-16 09:57:43 | |
No, as you can see. | 2024-09-16 09:57:46 | |
Property question is. | 2024-09-16 09:57:49 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 09:57:52 | |
Phase of the plot, so. | 2024-09-16 09:57:58 | |
And again. | 2024-09-16 09:58:01 | |
To identify from the analysis of that. | 2024-09-16 09:58:04 | |
The loss that seemed to be. | 2024-09-16 09:58:07 | |
Similar to the applicant property question. | 2024-09-16 09:58:10 | |
What's this neighboring property which is also shared in? | 2024-09-16 09:58:13 | |
When you. | 2024-09-16 09:58:17 | |
This applicant. | 2024-09-16 09:58:25 | |
This neighboring property actually has very. | 2024-09-16 09:58:28 | |
Approximately 15.1928. | 2024-09-16 09:58:35 | |
So those were. | 2024-09-16 09:58:38 | |
Right, so I understand it'd be. | 2024-09-16 09:58:44 | |
Because of these unique characteristics. | 2024-09-16 09:58:47 | |
When you do the averaging calculation. | 2024-09-16 09:58:50 | |
And under section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 09:58:52 | |
.04054. | 2024-09-16 09:58:56 | |
The result is somewhat skewed. | 2024-09-16 09:58:59 | |
Because you're assuming that you're. | 2024-09-16 09:59:02 | |
Normally, that statute applies to regularly shaped. | 2024-09-16 09:59:05 | |
That's correct. What's correct? | 2024-09-16 09:59:08 | |
I need to understand that. OK. Thank you, Mr. Ford. | 2024-09-16 09:59:11 | |
Appreciate it. | 2024-09-16 09:59:13 | |
The applicant. | 2024-09-16 09:59:14 | |
Uh. | 2024-09-16 09:59:29 | |
I think the basic. | 2024-09-16 09:59:32 | |
Ideas of what we're. | 2024-09-16 09:59:35 | |
Playing for today have been very well outlined by the city. | 2024-09-16 09:59:38 | |
Unfortunately, because of. | 2024-09-16 09:59:41 | |
Other scheduling conflicts. | 2024-09-16 09:59:44 | |
Person who wrote this narrative was. | 2024-09-16 09:59:47 | |
Unable to be with us, but I'll share some of the key points. | 2024-09-16 09:59:50 | |
He, he, the architect and. | 2024-09-16 09:59:53 | |
The owner worked through to come. | 2024-09-16 09:59:56 | |
Up with these points. | 2024-09-16 09:59:58 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 09:59:59 | |
Obviously we're requesting a. | 2024-09-16 10:00:02 | |
To reduce the setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:00:05 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 10:00:08 | |
The. | 2024-09-16 10:00:14 | |
From other properties, the lot was subdivided into. | 2024-09-16 10:00:20 | |
Two lots, the shape of the shape and being of the corner. | 2024-09-16 10:00:23 | |
Is being unique to this neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:00:26 | |
As mentioned above, the code requirement is 20 feet set back for the. | 2024-09-16 10:00:29 | |
Corner lots. The other lots used in the established. | 2024-09-16 10:00:32 | |
Established the average setbacks are located. | 2024-09-16 10:00:35 | |
Within the cul-de-sac and have varying front yard set back. | 2024-09-16 10:00:38 | |
Conditions. | 2024-09-16 10:00:40 | |
There was an attached site plan that's been displayed. | 2024-09-16 10:00:44 | |
Today benefits. | 2024-09-16 10:00:47 | |
And other other properties, same zoning. Enjoy. | 2024-09-16 10:00:50 | |
The neighbor across the street, 4405 S. | 2024-09-16 10:00:53 | |
Briarwood Circle is a corner. | 2024-09-16 10:00:56 | |
Lot it has an average set back of. | 2024-09-16 10:00:59 | |
Two feet. It will enhance the. | 2024-09-16 10:01:02 | |
Visual quality of the neighborhood and will add value to the. | 2024-09-16 10:01:05 | |
This will allow the structure of that. | 2024-09-16 10:01:08 | |
Property owners to enjoy. | 2024-09-16 10:01:11 | |
The other thing is that not to deviate from the general purpose. | 2024-09-16 10:01:14 | |
To the holiday holiday code, the purpose proposed. | 2024-09-16 10:01:17 | |
Home with the variance would still comply with. | 2024-09-16 10:01:20 | |
All holiday codes, including including site coverage. | 2024-09-16 10:01:23 | |
Impermeable service requirements. Height limits. | 2024-09-16 10:01:26 | |
And view corridor requirements it will comply. | 2024-09-16 10:01:29 | |
With code. With code 20 foot corner. | 2024-09-16 10:01:32 | |
Side setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:01:35 | |
Umm. | 2024-09-16 10:01:50 | |
The owners obviously not here. | 2024-09-16 10:01:53 | |
But the owner? | 2024-09-16 10:01:56 | |
My experience has been building in holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:01:59 | |
10 to 15 years and. | 2024-09-16 10:02:02 | |
Feel that the projects that I've been involved with. | 2024-09-16 10:02:05 | |
Have been a benefit to the City of Holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:02:08 | |
In addition to that the the owner. | 2024-09-16 10:02:11 | |
Just feed me on her behalf. | 2024-09-16 10:02:14 | |
Amazing access to that neighborhood. She's just a great person. | 2024-09-16 10:02:17 | |
Person and I'd love to have her as a neighbor myself. | 2024-09-16 10:02:20 | |
That's all question. | 2024-09-16 10:02:23 | |
So the law requires. | 2024-09-16 10:02:26 | |
Not only hardship, and I think I understand the hardship you can't do. | 2024-09-16 10:02:29 | |
Home that you. | 2024-09-16 10:02:32 | |
Have designed, but the other question is what? | 2024-09-16 10:02:35 | |
The special circumstance. | 2024-09-16 10:02:38 | |
Unique. | 2024-09-16 10:02:38 | |
Of this property that causes this hardship. | 2024-09-16 10:02:41 | |
Will you address what that special circumstance? | 2024-09-16 10:02:44 | |
To your property. | 2024-09-16 10:02:47 | |
Yeah, I think Justice was able to out like that. | 2024-09-16 10:02:50 | |
Fairly well, but the special circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:02:53 | |
Is the unique? | 2024-09-16 10:02:56 | |
Shape of the lot and. | 2024-09-16 10:02:59 | |
Corner the corner set back requirements. | 2024-09-16 10:03:02 | |
With the front yard. | 2024-09-16 10:03:05 | |
Regard to the pie shake homes. | 2024-09-16 10:03:08 | |
Was outlined already. | 2024-09-16 10:03:11 | |
The hardship falls where. | 2024-09-16 10:03:14 | |
You would want to build a home that is. | 2024-09-16 10:03:17 | |
Beautiful and complements the neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:03:20 | |
But would also not allow that owner to have. | 2024-09-16 10:03:23 | |
Any sort of a backyard. | 2024-09-16 10:03:26 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:03:29 | |
Any other comments from the city? | 2024-09-16 10:03:32 | |
All right. | 2024-09-16 10:03:35 | |
I'm going to. Could you give me a couple of minutes just to? | 2024-09-16 10:03:42 | |
Get my thoughts together on this and. | 2024-09-16 10:03:44 | |
Bye bye. | 2024-09-16 10:05:03 | |
Alright. | 2024-09-16 10:05:06 | |
We're back on the record. | 2024-09-16 10:05:09 | |
Will have a written decision. I will provide that to. | 2024-09-16 10:05:12 | |
The party that really. | 2024-09-16 10:05:15 | |
Decision should be available to you within. | 2024-09-16 10:05:18 | |
Five business days, I should have that. | 2024-09-16 10:05:21 | |
But I am ready to. | 2024-09-16 10:05:24 | |
State verbally. | 2024-09-16 10:05:27 | |
The decision. | 2024-09-16 10:05:30 | |
Decision will supersede what I state for the record. | 2024-09-16 10:05:33 | |
Today. But I think you want a decision so today. | 2024-09-16 10:05:36 | |
So. | 2024-09-16 10:05:39 | |
But the applicant has filed a request for a variance. | 2024-09-16 10:05:42 | |
Under section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:05:45 | |
04 of the city code. | 2024-09-16 10:05:48 | |
Utah requiring a minimum front set back. | 2024-09-16 10:05:51 | |
32.53 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:05:54 | |
Structures of the property line and the applicant request of their. | 2024-09-16 10:05:57 | |
And to allow for a front yard set back of. | 2024-09-16 10:06:00 | |
25.25 feet and stop me if I don't have. | 2024-09-16 10:06:03 | |
This correctly. | 2024-09-16 10:06:06 | |
African is required to meet the front yard set. | 2024-09-16 10:06:12 | |
Prescribed by section 13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:06:15 | |
.054 of the code. | 2024-09-16 10:06:18 | |
African cannot build a home that they had planned. | 2024-09-16 10:06:21 | |
The city has India. | 2024-09-16 10:06:24 | |
Indicated that this is a reasonably sized. | 2024-09-16 10:06:27 | |
Home compared to other homes on the cold affect. | 2024-09-16 10:06:30 | |
And so it would be an unreasonable heart. | 2024-09-16 10:06:33 | |
Prevent applicant from building reasonably sized. | 2024-09-16 10:06:36 | |
Tone. The issue is the surface. | 2024-09-16 10:06:39 | |
Fans peculiar to applicants property. | 2024-09-16 10:06:42 | |
The circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:06:45 | |
Peculiar to applicants property causing a. | 2024-09-16 10:06:48 | |
Is a somewhat skewed result. | 2024-09-16 10:06:51 | |
The averaging system calculation. Infection. | 2024-09-16 10:06:54 | |
13.14. | 2024-09-16 10:06:57 | |
4.054 The code to determine the request. | 2024-09-16 10:07:00 | |
Back requirement applicants. | 2024-09-16 10:07:06 | |
Corner lot is assessed relative to irate. | 2024-09-16 10:07:09 | |
Shaped lots within a cul-de-sac that are. | 2024-09-16 10:07:12 | |
Elongated with pie shaped front. | 2024-09-16 10:07:15 | |
The calculation provided in Section 3. | 2024-09-16 10:07:18 | |
15.14 point 04 assumes comparison comparison. | 2024-09-16 10:07:21 | |
Of similar properties with regular shape front law. | 2024-09-16 10:07:24 | |
This circumstance is not self-imposed. | 2024-09-16 10:07:27 | |
Or economic. | 2024-09-16 10:07:30 | |
The. | 2024-09-16 10:07:33 | |
Neighboring property across the street from applicants property. | 2024-09-16 10:07:36 | |
In the same cold as that currently has a required. | 2024-09-16 10:07:39 | |
Set back of 20.2. | 2024-09-16 10:07:42 | |
That right and the properties on the. | 2024-09-16 10:07:45 | |
South and east side of the applicant's property have front yard set. | 2024-09-16 10:07:48 | |
Back to 22 feet and 16 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:07:51 | |
Respectively. | 2024-09-16 10:07:54 | |
Of 25.25 feet will. | 2024-09-16 10:07:57 | |
Provide the applicant with substantial enjoyment of property right. | 2024-09-16 10:08:00 | |
Similar to those enjoyed by the Prop. | 2024-09-16 10:08:03 | |
Parties in the zone. | 2024-09-16 10:08:06 | |
This variant would not change. | 2024-09-16 10:08:09 | |
The character and development pattern of the neighborhood. | 2024-09-16 10:08:12 | |
And I stated the code. | 2024-09-16 10:08:15 | |
Instruction to be flexible to produce equal. | 2024-09-16 10:08:18 | |
Outcome is relevant when uniform set back. | 2024-09-16 10:08:21 | |
Standards would disproportionately affect properties. | 2024-09-16 10:08:24 | |
Unique shapes and characteristics. | 2024-09-16 10:08:27 | |
Granting a variance would ensure that the. | 2024-09-16 10:08:30 | |
Financial justice is done while holding the spirit. | 2024-09-16 10:08:33 | |
Of the zoning ordinance. | 2024-09-16 10:08:36 | |
So the decision is that. | 2024-09-16 10:08:39 | |
The applicant has met the burden. | 2024-09-16 10:08:42 | |
Approving 5 conditions justifying the. | 2024-09-16 10:08:45 | |
Variant accordingly. | 2024-09-16 10:08:48 | |
Applicant is granted a variance for. | 2024-09-16 10:08:51 | |
Property and the literal enforcement of section 13. | 2024-09-16 10:08:54 | |
.1404 the code as far. | 2024-09-16 10:08:57 | |
The front yard set back about the. | 2024-09-16 10:09:00 | |
Property shall be a minimum 25.5. | 2024-09-16 10:09:03 | |
Feet rather than the minimum. | 2024-09-16 10:09:06 | |
32.50 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:09:09 | |
Repeat required in section 13. | 2024-09-16 10:09:12 | |
14.054 of the code. | 2024-09-16 10:09:15 | |
Which is a variance of 77 point. | 2024-09-16 10:09:18 | |
To 8 feet applicant shall complete. | 2024-09-16 10:09:21 | |
Why with all other applicable provisions of the code? | 2024-09-16 10:09:24 | |
Including securing the required building permit. | 2024-09-16 10:09:27 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:09:30 | |
OK, the next item on the agenda is. | 2024-09-16 10:09:42 | |
The Holiday heights subsidy. | 2024-09-16 10:09:45 | |
In at the Holiday Peaks corner side set back. | 2024-09-16 10:09:48 | |
Variant. | 2024-09-16 10:09:51 | |
Representatives from the applicant here. | 2024-09-16 10:09:54 | |
Again, for the record. | 2024-09-16 10:10:09 | |
Goose was making this presentation. | 2024-09-16 10:10:13 | |
City planner, thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:10:18 | |
Jonathan Trailing Community Economic. | 2024-09-16 10:10:21 | |
And for the applicant. | 2024-09-16 10:10:24 | |
OK. | 2024-09-16 10:10:37 | |
First of all, I I want to. | 2024-09-16 10:10:39 | |
State, for the record, that I, the hearing officer. | 2024-09-16 10:10:43 | |
Have no conflicts of interest. | 2024-09-16 10:10:46 | |
Communicated with the city only for purposes of scheduling. | 2024-09-16 10:10:49 | |
And receiving materials. | 2024-09-16 10:10:51 | |
Under. | 2024-09-16 10:10:55 | |
Utah code and the Holiday City code. | 2024-09-16 10:10:58 | |
Excuse me? | 2024-09-16 10:11:01 | |
Uh. | 2024-09-16 10:11:07 | |
A duly appointed administrative appeals. | 2024-09-16 10:11:12 | |
Their self here and decide requests for variance. | 2024-09-16 10:11:16 | |
My name is Frank McNamara. | 2024-09-16 10:11:19 | |
Appointed administrative appeals officer for. | 2024-09-16 10:11:22 | |
Holiday city I do have. | 2024-09-16 10:11:25 | |
Information that has been presented to me, it's. | 2024-09-16 10:11:28 | |
The applicants. | 2024-09-16 10:11:31 | |
And the information they provided and. | 2024-09-16 10:11:34 | |
Also a city staff report. Did you get a copy? | 2024-09-16 10:11:37 | |
City staff report OK, so. | 2024-09-16 10:11:40 | |
So we shall that will be available. | 2024-09-16 10:11:43 | |
For my review and consideration. | 2024-09-16 10:11:46 | |
So we begin with the city making a presentation. | 2024-09-16 10:11:49 | |
To four. | 2024-09-16 10:11:51 | |
Thank you. | 2024-09-16 10:11:58 | |
Very much so this is. | 2024-09-16 10:12:01 | |
The case number 2 on the agenda today. | 2024-09-16 10:12:04 | |
And this is a corner side. | 2024-09-16 10:12:07 | |
Set back variant application. | 2024-09-16 10:12:10 | |
The address for the subject property is. | 2024-09-16 10:12:13 | |
4930 SW Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:12:16 | |
Holiday, Utah zip code 84117. | 2024-09-16 10:12:19 | |
Now this property. | 2024-09-16 10:12:22 | |
Size 0.25 acres and. | 2024-09-16 10:12:25 | |
Located within one of our single family residential. | 2024-09-16 10:12:28 | |
Now the governing. | 2024-09-16 10:12:31 | |
That pertain to. | 2024-09-16 10:12:34 | |
That hearing would be fun. | 2024-09-16 10:12:37 | |
In Title 13. | 2024-09-16 10:12:40 | |
Subsection 14.57 related. | 2024-09-16 10:12:43 | |
Corner size setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:12:46 | |
And then the variance which is. | 2024-09-16 10:12:49 | |
Title 13.09. Point 02. | 2024-09-16 10:12:52 | |
Now the request. | 2024-09-16 10:12:55 | |
Here today is that the applicant is seeking out. | 2024-09-16 10:12:58 | |
The City of Holiday code. | 2024-09-16 10:13:04 | |
Section 13. Point 14.5. | 2024-09-16 10:13:07 | |
7 pertaining to the corner side, set that. | 2024-09-16 10:13:10 | |
Now. | 2024-09-16 10:13:13 | |
Code regulates the. | 2024-09-16 10:13:16 | |
Minimum corner side set back on the public's. | 2024-09-16 10:13:19 | |
Street, a private road or a private. | 2024-09-16 10:13:22 | |
And the applicant is. | 2024-09-16 10:13:25 | |
Requesting to be granted a relief. | 2024-09-16 10:13:28 | |
From the prescribed 20 feet, standardized. | 2024-09-16 10:13:31 | |
Corner side set back and proposing to mention. | 2024-09-16 10:13:34 | |
At 12.4 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:13:37 | |
Corner on a site. | 2024-09-16 10:13:40 | |
Said Doug. So now this. | 2024-09-16 10:13:43 | |
Would represent the 15%. | 2024-09-16 10:13:46 | |
Set back requirement for. | 2024-09-16 10:13:49 | |
Side yard and. | 2024-09-16 10:13:52 | |
Exception would herein constitute. | 2024-09-16 10:13:55 | |
.6 feet corner side set back variant. | 2024-09-16 10:13:58 | |
Which would also run with the landing perpetuity. | 2024-09-16 10:14:01 | |
Now the background to this case is. | 2024-09-16 10:14:04 | |
That the applicant and agent. | 2024-09-16 10:14:07 | |
Heights Subdivision, LLC. | 2024-09-16 10:14:10 | |
And Mr. Peter, represented here, have. | 2024-09-16 10:14:13 | |
Filed an appeal with the administrative here. | 2024-09-16 10:14:16 | |
Seeking a variance to. | 2024-09-16 10:14:19 | |
Portions of holiday city code specific. | 2024-09-16 10:14:22 | |
Pertaining to the corner side set back distance. | 2024-09-16 10:14:25 | |
Required for any main structure. | 2024-09-16 10:14:28 | |
To the corner side of the property. | 2024-09-16 10:14:31 | |
Now the applicant has proposed the construction. | 2024-09-16 10:14:34 | |
Kind of a new home on the subject property, which is. | 2024-09-16 10:14:37 | |
The corner lot in the new holiday. | 2024-09-16 10:14:40 | |
Subdivision which you can see on the screen. | 2024-09-16 10:14:43 | |
Now the property located on 4930. | 2024-09-16 10:14:46 | |
East SW Moore Rd. Was formerly the. | 2024-09-16 10:14:49 | |
Site of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day. | 2024-09-16 10:14:52 | |
Saint Meetinghouse and. | 2024-09-16 10:14:55 | |
The applicant has completed the. | 2024-09-16 10:14:58 | |
Of the subdivision improvements and recording of the. | 2024-09-16 10:15:01 | |
With the building permit application yet? | 2024-09-16 10:15:04 | |
To be submitted to the city. | 2024-09-16 10:15:07 | |
Applicants have determined that the application of. | 2024-09-16 10:15:10 | |
Holiday City Code section 13.4. | 2024-09-16 10:15:13 | |
.057. | 2024-09-16 10:15:16 | |
Site setbacks would restrict. | 2024-09-16 10:15:19 | |
The proposed development on Lot 1. | 2024-09-16 10:15:22 | |
05, which is located on the northwest. | 2024-09-16 10:15:25 | |
Western corner of the subdivision. | 2024-09-16 10:15:28 | |
On the screen now. | 2024-09-16 10:15:31 | |
In that lot 105 is located on the. | 2024-09-16 10:15:34 | |
Intersection of Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:15:37 | |
And Delora Ling, the aforementioned set back. | 2024-09-16 10:15:40 | |
Gone in regulation requires all mainstream. | 2024-09-16 10:15:43 | |
On the corner lot to be assessed at a stand. | 2024-09-16 10:15:46 | |
That's 20 feet set back. | 2024-09-16 10:15:49 | |
Now the applicant is of the opinion that. | 2024-09-16 10:15:52 | |
105 certain. | 2024-09-16 10:15:55 | |
Unique conditions to be assessed using. | 2024-09-16 10:15:58 | |
Typical sidey outfit. | 2024-09-16 10:16:01 | |
Of the corner side set back. | 2024-09-16 10:16:04 | |
So they are hereby requesting a relief from the city. | 2024-09-16 10:16:10 | |
Code related to the standards 20 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:16:13 | |
Corner site setbacks and in turn. | 2024-09-16 10:16:16 | |
Seeking permission to maintain equity. | 2024-09-16 10:16:19 | |
A side yard set back which would be 12. | 2024-09-16 10:16:22 | |
.4 feet from the east side of. | 2024-09-16 10:16:25 | |
The property Additional information. | 2024-09-16 10:16:28 | |
The applicant's narrative supporting documents, including. | 2024-09-16 10:16:31 | |
Cyclone would be presented. | 2024-09-16 10:16:34 | |
Hearing by the applicant. | 2024-09-16 10:16:37 | |
Ordinances that pertain to this. | 2024-09-16 10:16:40 | |
It's the holiday city code on. | 2024-09-16 10:16:43 | |
Setbacks, Section 13.14 Point. | 2024-09-16 10:16:47 | |
050 and Holiday City Court. | 2024-09-16 10:16:49 | |
On corner site setbacks. | 2024-09-16 10:16:52 | |
13 point 14.057. | 2024-09-16 10:16:55 | |
And then holiday city ordinance on. | 2024-09-16 10:16:58 | |
Side yard setbacks which is. | 2024-09-16 10:17:01 | |
13 point 14.056. | 2024-09-16 10:17:04 | |
And again the approval of standard. | 2024-09-16 10:17:07 | |
As outlined by the state would be the same as. | 2024-09-16 10:17:10 | |
The one that was used to assess the first. | 2024-09-16 10:17:14 | |
Case this morning. | 2024-09-16 10:17:16 | |
So again, it is standard. | 2024-09-16 10:17:20 | |
Procedure for city staff to conduct an announcement. | 2024-09-16 10:17:22 | |
Based off of the contents of this. | 2024-09-16 10:17:26 | |
Subject property City staff does not. | 2024-09-16 10:17:29 | |
Vote on these matters and acts only. | 2024-09-16 10:17:32 | |
Advisory position on the technical aspects of the application. | 2024-09-16 10:17:35 | |
Now. | 2024-09-16 10:17:38 | |
Of the analysis, the 1st. | 2024-09-16 10:17:41 | |
Assessment that city staff did was to. | 2024-09-16 10:17:44 | |
First determine the intent. | 2024-09-16 10:17:47 | |
Intent of the 3D code. | 2024-09-16 10:17:50 | |
Now, the purpose of the city ordinance as outlined in. | 2024-09-16 10:17:53 | |
Section 13.14. Point. | 2024-09-16 10:17:56 | |
It states that pursuant to the city. | 2024-09-16 10:17:59 | |
Ordinance regulating setbacks on coronal law. | 2024-09-16 10:18:02 | |
But the minimum corner set set back. | 2024-09-16 10:18:05 | |
For any structure on a public. | 2024-09-16 10:18:08 | |
A private road or a private lane? | 2024-09-16 10:18:11 | |
Shall be 20 feet. | 2024-09-16 10:18:14 | |
Or intent of this standard 20. | 2024-09-16 10:18:17 | |
Set by difference for main structures and. | 2024-09-16 10:18:20 | |
Corner lot is to save God. | 2024-09-16 10:18:23 | |
Public health, safety and welfare. | 2024-09-16 10:18:26 | |
By way of regulating that spacing of building. | 2024-09-16 10:18:29 | |
Things and structures our way from property lines. | 2024-09-16 10:18:32 | |
The right away physical hazards and natural. | 2024-09-16 10:18:35 | |
Ultimately, these. | 2024-09-16 10:18:38 | |
Facing revelations seek to provide for. | 2024-09-16 10:18:41 | |
Lighten shade. | 2024-09-16 10:18:44 | |
In air movement, the use of passes. | 2024-09-16 10:18:47 | |
And active spaces and vegetation in the city. | 2024-09-16 10:18:50 | |
Which would ultimately contribute to that. | 2024-09-16 10:18:53 | |
Directly impacting the fiscal. | 2024-09-16 10:18:56 | |
In psychological well-being of residents. | 2024-09-16 10:18:59 | |
City staff have determined that the critical factor is. | 2024-09-16 10:19:02 | |
Assessing conformance with the general purpose and. | 2024-09-16 10:19:05 | |
Intent of this ordinance. | 2024-09-16 10:19:08 | |
That the public safety element is compromised. | 2024-09-16 10:19:11 | |
In this scenario particularly regardless. | 2024-09-16 10:19:14 | |
In the club you restrictions and in. | 2024-09-16 10:19:17 | |
Attacks on traffic flow and pedestrian safety. | 2024-09-16 10:19:20 | |
Since this is on a corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:19:23 | |
Now the first assessment was impact. | 2024-09-16 10:19:26 | |
Restrictions now. | 2024-09-16 10:19:29 | |
Of holidays to decode on Clearview restriction. | 2024-09-16 10:19:32 | |
Specified in section 13 Point. | 2024-09-16 10:19:35 | |
76.7108. | 2024-09-16 10:19:38 | |
One it states that no. | 2024-09-16 10:19:41 | |
Construction in excess of two feet. | 2024-09-16 10:19:44 | |
In height shall be placed within the report. | 2024-09-16 10:19:47 | |
Clearview area of the corner lot. | 2024-09-16 10:19:50 | |
Now our spatial analysis. | 2024-09-16 10:19:53 | |
But the proposed location of the main house. | 2024-09-16 10:19:56 | |
Does not conflict with. | 2024-09-16 10:19:59 | |
The provisions of the cloud view restrictions. | 2024-09-16 10:20:02 | |
On on public safety, so you can see. | 2024-09-16 10:20:05 | |
The assessment that we did on the screen. | 2024-09-16 10:20:08 | |
Restriction zone would be and whether. | 2024-09-16 10:20:11 | |
Proposed structure is going to be. | 2024-09-16 10:20:14 | |
More specifically, the building would be set. | 2024-09-16 10:20:17 | |
Set back at least 30 feet from the. | 2024-09-16 10:20:20 | |
West to east horizontal Clearview restrictions. | 2024-09-16 10:20:23 | |
And 14 feet from the north to. | 2024-09-16 10:20:26 | |
Clearview Restriction zone. | 2024-09-16 10:20:29 | |
And as you can see, that's the assessment. | 2024-09-16 10:20:32 | |
That we did based off of that Clearview assessment. | 2024-09-16 10:20:35 | |
The second analysis that. | 2024-09-16 10:20:38 | |
City staff dead was the impact of. | 2024-09-16 10:20:41 | |
This proposed development. | 2024-09-16 10:20:44 | |
On through traffic. | 2024-09-16 10:20:47 | |
And pedestrian safety now on. | 2024-09-16 10:20:50 | |
Analysis also indicates that the proposed location of this. | 2024-09-16 10:20:53 | |
Onto traffic now. Conclusion. | 2024-09-16 10:20:59 | |
Was made based on their characteristics of the road. | 2024-09-16 10:21:02 | |
Intersection at West. | 2024-09-16 10:21:05 | |
And the lower length the proposed. | 2024-09-16 10:21:08 | |
Structure is set to maintain a reduced. | 2024-09-16 10:21:11 | |
Set back on the east side of the property. | 2024-09-16 10:21:14 | |
Adjacent to Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:21:17 | |
Such traffic impacts and pedestrians 50. | 2024-09-16 10:21:20 | |
Should be primarily evaluated based on connect. | 2024-09-16 10:21:23 | |
And access from the corner of. | 2024-09-16 10:21:26 | |
Traveling northbound to. | 2024-09-16 10:21:29 | |
Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:21:32 | |
And abruptly after 150. | 2024-09-16 10:21:35 | |
Feet. So it's. It's not a connecting interface. | 2024-09-16 10:21:38 | |
On Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:21:41 | |
This suggests that the traffic to and from the corner. | 2024-09-16 10:21:44 | |
Delaware Lane to the northbound. | 2024-09-16 10:21:47 | |
Off Westmore Rd. Which? | 2024-09-16 10:21:50 | |
Be largely limited to generated. | 2024-09-16 10:21:53 | |
By two properties located at. | 2024-09-16 10:21:56 | |
On the east side of the applicants property, now these. | 2024-09-16 10:21:59 | |
Properties can be seen 49. | 2024-09-16 10:22:02 | |
11 S and 4920. | 2024-09-16 10:22:05 | |
Westmore Rd. | 2024-09-16 10:22:08 | |
Would be the the two neighboring. | 2024-09-16 10:22:11 | |
Properties where traffic would be generated because it's. | 2024-09-16 10:22:14 | |
Not a connecting thoroughfare now. | 2024-09-16 10:22:17 | |
Given that this portion of the traveling. | 2024-09-16 10:22:20 | |
Primarily sets as access for these two. | 2024-09-16 10:22:23 | |
Neighboring properties. City staff. | 2024-09-16 10:22:26 | |
Determined that the proposed structure would not. | 2024-09-16 10:22:29 | |
Can we affect through traffic? | 2024-09-16 10:22:32 | |
And safety in a manner that is detrimental to. | 2024-09-16 10:22:35 | |
To the public interest, so that. | 2024-09-16 10:22:38 | |
That's the nature of the road, that. | 2024-09-16 10:22:41 | |
Staff also shows us an exhibit. | 2024-09-16 10:22:44 | |
Now the next thing for city staff. | 2024-09-16 10:22:47 | |
Was to assess the application. | 2024-09-16 10:22:50 | |
Based off of the state. | 2024-09-16 10:22:53 | |
Criteria of the five part test variant. | 2024-09-16 10:22:56 | |
Now the first one is to. | 2024-09-16 10:22:59 | |
Describing what hardship is going to occur. | 2024-09-16 10:23:02 | |
The applicant is not granted this very authority. | 2024-09-16 10:23:05 | |
Exceptionally. | 2024-09-16 10:23:08 | |
Demonstration of unique circumstances. | 2024-09-16 10:23:11 | |
Or an unreasonable hardship. | 2024-09-16 10:23:14 | |
In it exceptionally hard to comply with the zoning. | 2024-09-16 10:23:17 | |
The applicant submitted through site plan. | 2024-09-16 10:23:20 | |
To demonstrate their burden of proof. | 2024-09-16 10:23:23 | |
The applicant contends. | 2024-09-16 10:23:26 | |
That with the required. | 2024-09-16 10:23:29 | |