Planning Commission Meeting
Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| Good afternoon and welcome to the Holiday city planning. | 00:00:00 | |
| Commission work session. | 00:00:04 | |
| It is 534 on September 2nd, 2025. We have all Commissioners in attendance except our newest 1 Commissioner. | 00:00:06 | |
| Tripany. | 00:00:15 | |
| Trypani is not with us. | 00:00:17 | |
| And we have council and city staff, Miss Marsh. So with that we have. | 00:00:19 | |
| 4 items on the agenda. | 00:00:26 | |
| Wait a minute. | 00:00:29 | |
| Five items on the agenda. | 00:00:31 | |
| But there's a recognition of service award for commissioner. | 00:00:33 | |
| Former Commissioner Bill Chinsky. | 00:00:36 | |
| I don't know what that is. Is she coming? Do we have something arranged? | 00:00:39 | |
| I've it will just be a. | 00:00:43 | |
| Recognition. | 00:00:46 | |
| All right, I didn't plan a speech or anything, so. | 00:00:48 | |
| I'll do the best I can and wing that. | 00:00:51 | |
| And then we have the public hearing for the McDonald. | 00:00:53 | |
| David McDonald, Historic Home and then three. | 00:00:57 | |
| Different things for Amare Vita. | 00:01:01 | |
| So with that. | 00:01:04 | |
| Tell us about the David MacDonald House. | 00:01:06 | |
| OK, really quick note to when I was looking at the. | 00:01:10 | |
| Staff report for. | 00:01:15 | |
| Items number 23. | 00:01:18 | |
| Forward realized that I didn't put the most current one in the packet. | 00:01:19 | |
| So. | 00:01:25 | |
| I'll have the current one up on the screen. | 00:01:26 | |
| And you all have a printed copy of the current one. | 00:01:29 | |
| The changes. | 00:01:32 | |
| Are on page. | 00:01:35 | |
| Three, there's some emissions. | 00:01:37 | |
| About variance. | 00:01:40 | |
| Page 6 emissions about a variance and page 7. | 00:01:42 | |
| So it's just taking out references to a variance. | 00:01:46 | |
| The new packet. That or staff report. | 00:01:50 | |
| UMM is discussing. | 00:01:54 | |
| Lot width and. | 00:01:57 | |
| A definition in our code. | 00:01:59 | |
| For exceptions to lot width. | 00:02:01 | |
| So we'll go over that once we get to that item, but that is. | 00:02:03 | |
| Kind of the change out and difference in the staff report. | 00:02:06 | |
| And I have the old. | 00:02:09 | |
| Up on the screen too, and then the. | 00:02:12 | |
| The new one too, so I'll show you specifically where those. | 00:02:14 | |
| Changes were made. | 00:02:18 | |
| OK. All right. | 00:02:20 | |
| So item number one, we'll start there. | 00:02:22 | |
| Or, umm. | 00:02:25 | |
| I guess it's actually #2 since we're skipping. | 00:02:25 | |
| My agenda has misnumbered. | 00:02:29 | |
| Items here because we've got Commissioner Bill Chinsky in there. | 00:02:31 | |
| And my screen is being. | 00:02:35 | |
| Very strange. | 00:02:37 | |
| OK, there we go. | 00:02:39 | |
| I think it's a chord. | 00:02:41 | |
| Way to go, you broke it. | 00:02:51 | |
| All right, how about you? | 00:02:59 | |
| Good, yeah. | 00:03:01 | |
| Missed you. | 00:03:03 | |
| I'm pretty sure we've gone off the rails entirely. | 00:03:07 | |
| I I. | 00:03:11 | |
| Tootsie rolls on my. | 00:03:24 | |
| Let me try reconnecting and see if that fixes it. | 00:03:27 | |
| There's no sign. | 00:03:33 | |
| In Africa Africa was in March. | 00:03:44 | |
| This most recent trip was just Hawaii. | 00:03:48 | |
| So I was I. | 00:03:51 | |
| Just Hawaii. | 00:03:54 | |
| Which island? | 00:04:01 | |
| Big. | 00:04:02 | |
| Of it I'm still to my. | 00:04:04 | |
| Aloha logo. | 00:04:08 | |
| At the Hawaiian 5 or Dime or whatever they call those tourist tours. | 00:04:10 | |
| Not this time. You did it. | 00:04:18 | |
| It's cool. | 00:04:23 | |
| Very cool. | 00:04:24 | |
| Are they like the Steve Irwin kind of manta rays? Like are there mortal pair? | 00:04:27 | |
| So. | 00:04:32 | |
| And they come around, you come watch them. | 00:04:35 | |
| How big are the Stingrays? | 00:04:39 | |
| What's the difference? | 00:04:46 | |
| I don't know. | 00:04:47 | |
| Just the little thing on the end of it that will kill you. | 00:04:48 | |
| Side. | 00:04:51 | |
| Oh, are they? | 00:04:53 | |
| You're attracted to the light. | 00:04:57 | |
| So you watch them at night? Did you do that? | 00:04:59 | |
| We did it. | 00:05:02 | |
| It's pretty cool. | 00:05:03 | |
| I've tried it and I just fall off her. | 00:05:09 | |
| Well. | 00:05:17 | |
| Sounds intense. | 00:05:19 | |
| It's been way too difficult. | 00:05:20 | |
| Good for you. Thanks a lot. | 00:05:24 | |
| If you know any good garage door guys let me know. I got 3 beds coming out this week. | 00:05:43 | |
| So you're working for well. | 00:05:49 | |
| It's old and beat up and. | 00:05:54 | |
| Monarch. | 00:05:58 | |
| Yeah. | 00:06:02 | |
| For surface repair or like. | 00:06:03 | |
| Probably both. | 00:06:06 | |
| There we go. | 00:06:07 | |
| Like Francesco Door or something? | 00:06:17 | |
| And we're back. | 00:06:19 | |
| I don't know why it struggles sometimes. | 00:06:22 | |
| All right, so let's go through. | 00:06:25 | |
| Our historical. | 00:06:28 | |
| Use and modifications item. This one is on. | 00:06:30 | |
| 4659 S Highland Drive. | 00:06:36 | |
| This is the David McDonald House who was just added to the city code as a historical property on Thursday at City Council. | 00:06:40 | |
| And the new property owner. | 00:06:48 | |
| Is looking to use that. | 00:06:51 | |
| Location as a. | 00:06:54 | |
| Custom jewelry shop. | 00:06:55 | |
| And. | 00:06:57 | |
| So making some modifications and then also the the use is what the conditional use. | 00:06:59 | |
| Wouldn't tell the key. | 00:07:04 | |
| Part of the staff report is director John Terry. | 00:07:07 | |
| Review and recommendation. | 00:07:12 | |
| He goes through each of the levels of review on historical. | 00:07:14 | |
| Uses and modifications. | 00:07:17 | |
| Pretty detailed on there. | 00:07:20 | |
| The one that you may have. | 00:07:25 | |
| Questions on is this tall freeze element? I was not sure what that was myself but it is the trim piece. | 00:07:27 | |
| That is. | 00:07:34 | |
| Underneath umm. | 00:07:35 | |
| The soffit. | 00:07:37 | |
| I'll point it out. | 00:07:43 | |
| Picture here. | 00:07:44 | |
| So this term piece here. | 00:07:49 | |
| Like an exterior crown molding. | 00:07:54 | |
| Yeah, exterior Chrome. | 00:07:56 | |
| That's a good way to put it. | 00:07:59 | |
| So you can see it in the recent ones, but then also in the. | 00:08:02 | |
| Historical photos as well. | 00:08:05 | |
| A little bit less intense. | 00:08:07 | |
| On the original. | 00:08:10 | |
| And then possible. | 00:08:12 | |
| Built up overtime. | 00:08:13 | |
| So. | 00:08:15 | |
| The three items that. | 00:08:17 | |
| That John noted in his review. | 00:08:23 | |
| Were the addition of the rear porch. | 00:08:26 | |
| This second level edition. | 00:08:30 | |
| That would be the sun room. | 00:08:32 | |
| Area that's up above the. | 00:08:34 | |
| Addition. | 00:08:36 | |
| And that the freeze. | 00:08:38 | |
| Frisee from the upper. | 00:08:39 | |
| And then the scale of the column supporting the front porch. | 00:08:42 | |
| You can discuss those items with the applicant. | 00:08:45 | |
| And. | 00:08:50 | |
| Did you say this? | 00:08:55 | |
| Was sorry you say this was. | 00:08:56 | |
| Approved, Uh. | 00:08:58 | |
| As a historical building. | 00:08:59 | |
| In the last meeting of City Council. | 00:09:01 | |
| Yes. | 00:09:04 | |
| So our. | 00:09:05 | |
| Our code for historical buildings. | 00:09:06 | |
| Our historical sites. | 00:09:10 | |
| There wasn't a way to designate new buildings to. | 00:09:13 | |
| Our site designation list. | 00:09:18 | |
| So that was one of the changes that was made in the code modifications for historical site preservation. | 00:09:20 | |
| What was it earlier this year? | 00:09:28 | |
| So, and that is one of the. | 00:09:30 | |
| Homes that. | 00:09:35 | |
| Designated in the general plan is called out. | 00:09:36 | |
| It's already been on the National. | 00:09:39 | |
| Historic Register. | 00:09:42 | |
| So it was. | 00:09:44 | |
| Supported for the designation. | 00:09:45 | |
| So now that it's added into the code. | 00:09:48 | |
| In the historical sites. | 00:09:50 | |
| Now it's eligible for. | 00:09:53 | |
| Conditional use. | 00:09:55 | |
| So kind of the process to get it designated first. | 00:09:57 | |
| So then it's eligible for. | 00:10:00 | |
| Use and modification. | 00:10:01 | |
| So to clarify, what conditional use does that historic designation that it just got? | 00:10:03 | |
| Permit under. | 00:10:09 | |
| What we're going through like. | 00:10:12 | |
| Could it have not have just been a jewelry store in an old building without it? | 00:10:14 | |
| Yes, because it is. | 00:10:18 | |
| Zoned as RM. | 00:10:20 | |
| This is the similar to the other historic property that we've done a conditional use on. | 00:10:22 | |
| It's typically easier to go through a. | 00:10:27 | |
| Designation and the historic. | 00:10:32 | |
| Modification Conditional use permit. | 00:10:36 | |
| Rather than rezoning it to. | 00:10:38 | |
| That was an option that the property owner had available. | 00:10:41 | |
| But encouraged by staff to go through the historic. | 00:10:45 | |
| Site Preservation. | 00:10:48 | |
| OK. Thank you for clarifying. | 00:10:49 | |
| So there are no flight on. | 00:10:52 | |
| Site modific. | 00:10:56 | |
| Is really just the exterior of the building. | 00:10:57 | |
| Second level edition. | 00:11:00 | |
| Porch, ADA ramp and then some landscaping modifications. | 00:11:02 | |
| A gated entrance. | 00:11:08 | |
| At the front. | 00:11:09 | |
| And I think there was a one tree removal. | 00:11:14 | |
| In the front, yes. Yes there are. | 00:11:16 | |
| There were two pine trees up in the front that were removed. | 00:11:20 | |
| So just some replacement of those. They can be either on site or off site, whatever the. | 00:11:24 | |
| The Commission would. | 00:11:29 | |
| Would like to. | 00:11:31 | |
| Choose with the applicant. | 00:11:33 | |
| So we have to call that out in the. | 00:11:37 | |
| As part of the. | 00:11:39 | |
| Application uh. | 00:11:41 | |
| It's anytime you have an application. | 00:11:42 | |
| If there's modifications or tree removals, it requires a tree replacement. | 00:11:44 | |
| The applicant may have plans to put trees in the front yard. | 00:11:52 | |
| Or they. | 00:11:56 | |
| They may like to have up to half of the. | 00:11:57 | |
| Replacement trays required located off site. | 00:12:00 | |
| So if they had two that were required, they could replace one off site. | 00:12:03 | |
| Any other questions around? | 00:12:14 | |
| OK, I think we're ready to roll into the. | 00:12:16 | |
| The 234 items. | 00:12:20 | |
| OK. Or I guess 345 depending on how you number? | 00:12:22 | |
| And this one should be familiar. | 00:12:29 | |
| Had it as discussion items in our last agenda. | 00:12:32 | |
| Or our last meeting. | 00:12:36 | |
| Let me get to that location. | 00:12:39 | |
| OK. | 00:12:58 | |
| So this is the packet with the old. | 00:13:00 | |
| Information in it. | 00:13:02 | |
| This is the part that. | 00:13:04 | |
| Talks about the variance. | 00:13:08 | |
| That is removed in the modified 1. | 00:13:10 | |
| And then these couple of points. | 00:13:14 | |
| And. | 00:13:17 | |
| The approval this one. | 00:13:21 | |
| So at this point. | 00:13:24 | |
| And. | 00:13:26 | |
| This one. | 00:13:29 | |
| So those are all removed. | 00:13:30 | |
| This is the. | 00:13:32 | |
| Updated. | 00:13:33 | |
| So we'll just jump over to that. | 00:13:34 | |
| OK. | 00:13:47 | |
| I think we're all pretty clear on the process for this. It will be 3 public hearings. | 00:13:49 | |
| Concepts of division first. | 00:13:55 | |
| And then second will be the. | 00:13:57 | |
| Planned unit development. | 00:13:59 | |
| Conditional use, that's where. | 00:14:00 | |
| Most of the content is. | 00:14:02 | |
| And then the final will be incorporating the PUD elements into the preliminary plat. | 00:14:04 | |
| Probably most helpful to go through some of the PUD elements. Are there questions on those from? | 00:14:11 | |
| The last meeting. | 00:14:18 | |
| And then possibly on the. | 00:14:20 | |
| Concept subdivision as well. | 00:14:22 | |
| So let's go to. Let's start with that concept subdivision. | 00:14:29 | |
| And the change that was made. | 00:14:33 | |
| It is in. | 00:14:38 | |
| Area and. | 00:14:44 | |
| Some standards. | 00:14:51 | |
| OK, so this is the note on lot width. | 00:14:56 | |
| So the lot width is reduced from 100 feet due to significant trees and streams and floodplains. | 00:14:59 | |
| This is the definition of lot width and 13.04 point 040. | 00:15:06 | |
| Lotwith is based off the. | 00:15:12 | |
| Diameter of the largest circle that can be inscribed entirely within a lot. | 00:15:14 | |
| The lot which circles should not include streams, floodplains, wetlands, areas of 30% slower, greater or other natural. | 00:15:19 | |
| Hazard areas. | 00:15:26 | |
| Or a significant tree. | 00:15:28 | |
| Significantly. | 00:15:31 | |
| So. | 00:15:33 | |
| There is. | 00:15:35 | |
| Concepts of division layout that shows is overlaid on. | 00:15:38 | |
| Their tree plan. | 00:15:44 | |
| So those two things were. | 00:15:46 | |
| Merged together. | 00:15:48 | |
| So with the significant trees on there and then the. | 00:15:55 | |
| Waterway. | 00:15:59 | |
| Where the basis of reducing the lot width from 100 feet. | 00:16:01 | |
| To I think there's a range of 89 to 92 1/2. | 00:16:05 | |
| Feet. They're still meeting the front. | 00:16:11 | |
| Or the lot frontage. | 00:16:14 | |
| The overall width. | 00:16:18 | |
| It seems like they need to take one lot out of there to make it kind of work a little better. | 00:16:25 | |
| Looks like everything is kind of just jammed in there and it. | 00:16:30 | |
| Doesn't really add to the. | 00:16:34 | |
| The organic nature of what you're trying to create. | 00:16:36 | |
| Right. And that's. | 00:16:40 | |
| Where it has enough land area. | 00:16:41 | |
| For each of the lots. | 00:16:44 | |
| All meeting the. | 00:16:47 | |
| One acre size. | 00:16:48 | |
| The natural features on there with the trees and the. | 00:16:50 | |
| And the waterway is then what is reducing those lot with standards? | 00:16:55 | |
| To 92 ish on average from. | 00:17:00 | |
| 100. | 00:17:05 | |
| But you can see that with the setbacks drawn on there. | 00:17:07 | |
| There isn't a practical building lot. | 00:17:10 | |
| That kind of. | 00:17:14 | |
| Defeats the. | 00:17:15 | |
| Point of dream. | 00:17:16 | |
| That they can do this but. | 00:17:20 | |
| So within the 92. | 00:17:23 | |
| As long as they build the building. | 00:17:26 | |
| Within that 92 circle with it, whatever it is, 510 foot set back on the side yard. | 00:17:28 | |
| Then they're still in compliance with. | 00:17:34 | |
| Oops, what's on there, right? | 00:17:37 | |
| Right with the LOT standards. | 00:17:38 | |
| I think the city has done a great job in trying to maintain the character here and I'd like to see. | 00:17:43 | |
| This subdivision kind of embraces. | 00:17:47 | |
| More of that idea rather than. | 00:17:50 | |
| Having a lot of different homes. | 00:17:52 | |
| That could be right next to each other. | 00:17:55 | |
| They would kind of look kind of odd. | 00:17:57 | |
| But I'll be quiet now. | 00:17:59 | |
| Yeah, I think that. | 00:18:04 | |
| Then that leads into. | 00:18:05 | |
| Some of the intent behind a PUD is so that you have more creative layout than what a standard. | 00:18:10 | |
| Subdivision. Uh. | 00:18:16 | |
| Would allow. | 00:18:17 | |
| So that you have some flexibility as to where. | 00:18:19 | |
| Structures can be placed, maybe some limitations on. | 00:18:24 | |
| Overall sizes. | 00:18:27 | |
| Related, I think to that. | 00:18:34 | |
| And there's some language about areas of coverage. | 00:18:36 | |
| And there's two different numbers. | 00:18:41 | |
| 23 or 28% and 22 or 27. | 00:18:44 | |
| And if I could understand my notes. | 00:18:48 | |
| That was because of the. | 00:18:51 | |
| Pool it was in in the original plan. | 00:18:52 | |
| And I thought I heard last time that they didn't mean to put the pool on the documents we had. | 00:18:55 | |
| I just want to make sure that if we make a motion. | 00:19:02 | |
| Apparently that language is in the motion somewhere. | 00:19:05 | |
| And I just want to make sure. | 00:19:08 | |
| Which of those areas of coverage we're really improving? | 00:19:11 | |
| Talking about on page 4. | 00:19:15 | |
| Yeah, so we have. | 00:19:18 | |
| This is what the LOT standard is. | 00:19:21 | |
| For lot coverage. | 00:19:23 | |
| 23% for structures. | 00:19:26 | |
| 28% total. | 00:19:28 | |
| In the R143 zone. | 00:19:30 | |
| 20% for structures, 33% total. | 00:19:32 | |
| Oh sorry, I reverse this. R143 first and then R187. | 00:19:36 | |
| For that second percent. | 00:19:40 | |
| We our code allows for a bonus coverage. | 00:19:43 | |
| So that would then increase. | 00:19:47 | |
| The total block coverage up. | 00:19:49 | |
| 10%. | 00:19:51 | |
| So those same standards could be applied, but. | 00:19:53 | |
| The. | 00:19:56 | |
| The Commission would have to decide on the rationale, because it is. | 00:19:58 | |
| Two different standards across two different zones. | 00:20:02 | |
| So. | 00:20:05 | |
| You could. | 00:20:06 | |
| Either, umm. | 00:20:07 | |
| Apply that lot coverage standard to each zone sort so each side of the tree can say this is the standard for this side and this is | 00:20:08 | |
| the standard for this side. | 00:20:12 | |
| Or you can. | 00:20:16 | |
| Create a project overall. | 00:20:17 | |
| Standard. | 00:20:20 | |
| Which is somewhere between the two. | 00:20:21 | |
| Do we have what that recommend is recommendation is in the staff report already there is a recommendation? | 00:20:27 | |
| Where the proposal? | 00:20:33 | |
| Is seeking to shift. | 00:20:37 | |
| One of the dwelling units to the east side of the Creek. | 00:20:39 | |
| It seemed a little bit less complicated. | 00:20:43 | |
| To just have a kind of middle line standard that applies across the whole project. | 00:20:46 | |
| And I think that the recommendation was. | 00:20:52 | |
| 22%. | 00:20:55 | |
| Since most of the land is and the R143 zone. | 00:21:00 | |
| And that's not approval of the PUD. | 00:21:04 | |
| Yeah, that would be one of the conditions of the beauty. | 00:21:09 | |
| That's where you can put a limitation. | 00:21:13 | |
| On that coverage. | 00:21:15 | |
| That he'll pencil out for you, Commissioner. | 00:21:25 | |
| Yeah. | 00:21:28 | |
| Yeah. So this is the. | 00:21:29 | |
| Yeah, this is the part I was talking about. | 00:21:33 | |
| Simplification. | 00:21:35 | |
| That a coverage maximum for the entire project at either 2328 for our 1:43. | 00:21:37 | |
| Or midpoint between the two. | 00:21:43 | |
| 60% of the project areas in the R143 zone. | 00:21:47 | |
| Coverage limit of 22. | 00:21:51 | |
| And 27 total. | 00:21:53 | |
| Is what is recommended, but that's also. | 00:21:55 | |
| Can't be discussed with the applicant. | 00:21:58 | |
| As it's a more. | 00:22:01 | |
| Arbitrary thing. There's more unknowns where they don't know what the size of their structures will be, but then they can take | 00:22:02 | |
| that as the project overall. | 00:22:06 | |
| And kind of subtract. | 00:22:10 | |
| Total coverage out of the project as they go along. | 00:22:13 | |
| So maybe by the time they get to the last house there may not be a lot of structure coverage left. | 00:22:18 | |
| Be a really skinny bunkhouse. | 00:22:26 | |
| Yeah, and that creates some of that limitation. | 00:22:28 | |
| To make sure that there's not just. | 00:22:31 | |
| Large structures that are. | 00:22:35 | |
| Covering the. | 00:22:37 | |
| The entire property, the percentage based coverage. | 00:22:37 | |
| Creates a natural limitation. | 00:22:41 | |
| All right, other questions around the. | 00:22:47 | |
| Concept or PUD elements? | 00:22:51 | |
| Do we have any questions on the preliminary plat? | 00:22:57 | |
| For. | 00:23:01 | |
| Oh, the other thing, Commissioner Roche, that we can talk about is this one or two acre parcel analysis. | 00:23:04 | |
| That is. | 00:23:10 | |
| Addition since the last meeting. | 00:23:12 | |
| Umm, this shows. | 00:23:14 | |
| What? | 00:23:18 | |
| How many parcels are two acres in each zone? | 00:23:19 | |
| And then how many? | 00:23:22 | |
| Parcels are. | 00:23:23 | |
| One acre. | 00:23:25 | |
| So the three. | 00:23:27 | |
| Parcels involved here are or sorry for. | 00:23:29 | |
| These ones here. | 00:23:33 | |
| Most of the parcels in the R143 zone are conforming or in some cases. | 00:23:35 | |
| Over conforming so they're larger than an acre. | 00:23:41 | |
| Up to 2 acres. | 00:23:46 | |
| There's a few. | 00:23:47 | |
| Parcels here in the R187 zone that are smaller. | 00:23:49 | |
| Than two acres. | 00:23:53 | |
| But if everything is approved on what they've. | 00:23:59 | |
| The applicants brought forward today, then that would. | 00:24:01 | |
| All those would be. | 00:24:07 | |
| Not highlighted because they'd all be less than an acre at that point, except for the one. | 00:24:10 | |
| In the R187. | 00:24:14 | |
| Is that right? | 00:24:16 | |
| Right. | 00:24:17 | |
| Which is also the nature of. | 00:24:20 | |
| Beauties where you're going to create property that. | 00:24:22 | |
| Is not going to be. | 00:24:26 | |
| Necessarily a full. | 00:24:27 | |
| Conformity with the zone. There's just enough land in that. | 00:24:29 | |
| Area for. | 00:24:32 | |
| To meet the requirements of the zone. | 00:24:34 | |
| Thank you for clarifying that. | 00:24:45 | |
| And that's why it's recorded on the plat as well as being a PUD. | 00:24:47 | |
| When pewdies are created, you have your overall project area. | 00:24:57 | |
| And then you have your set building areas that are recorded and then you can't expand outside of those. | 00:25:00 | |
| So those have been done since. | 00:25:06 | |
| Before holiday incorporated under Salt Lake County. | 00:25:09 | |
| There's several developments. | 00:25:12 | |
| That are pretty large scale developments that have. | 00:25:14 | |
| They resulted in lots that are smaller than the zone standard. | 00:25:18 | |
| But the trade off is then that there's open space that's common or. | 00:25:22 | |
| Shifted to other areas within the project instead of having each individual lot to meet the. | 00:25:26 | |
| Meet the lot size standard. | 00:25:32 | |
| Will any of the properties fall as low as the R121 standard though? | 00:25:36 | |
| With what's being proposed. | 00:25:41 | |
| No. | 00:25:43 | |
| The other question we had from the other. | 00:25:49 | |
| From the previous meeting. | 00:25:52 | |
| Was tree detail. | 00:25:54 | |
| And the applicant added some additional. | 00:25:56 | |
| Detail on their tree plan. | 00:26:00 | |
| That shows the. | 00:26:02 | |
| Canopy area that's being removed. | 00:26:05 | |
| So that's the cloud. | 00:26:09 | |
| Areas that you'll see in red. | 00:26:12 | |
| So the red diagonal hash lines are. | 00:26:15 | |
| Where there's roadway. | 00:26:19 | |
| Underneath the canopy as well. | 00:26:22 | |
| I think this is canopy that comes over. | 00:26:27 | |
| They you can go through that with the applicant. | 00:26:29 | |
| So the line. | 00:26:32 | |
| The red. | 00:26:33 | |
| Circles are canopy removal. Or that's just canopy existence. | 00:26:34 | |
| Let's see. | 00:26:40 | |
| So it's the. | 00:26:41 | |
| The hash. | 00:26:43 | |
| Cloud headlines and you can't tell that it's little zigzag. | 00:26:46 | |
| Around it. | 00:26:48 | |
| It is. So it's this existing tree canopy to be removed. | 00:26:49 | |
| Is. | 00:26:53 | |
| This area. | 00:26:55 | |
| OK. And then tree canopy tree? | 00:26:57 | |
| Is outside here, so there's identification of canopy. | 00:27:00 | |
| That's staying and then some canopy that's being removed. So you have some that's being removed here for Rd. | 00:27:04 | |
| You have can't tree canopy being removed here for a Rd. | 00:27:11 | |
| And then the actual trees associated with. | 00:27:15 | |
| Each of those. | 00:27:18 | |
| So on that. | 00:27:19 | |
| There's tree canopy to remain with a house built literally in the middle of that big red circle, right? | 00:27:21 | |
| On this one. | 00:27:29 | |
| One down. | 00:27:30 | |
| One down this one, yeah. | 00:27:31 | |
| Yeah, the. | 00:27:34 | |
| It doesn't have all of the tree canopy on that. They may be some smaller trees. | 00:27:40 | |
| Umm. | 00:27:46 | |
| But all of those details are. | 00:27:54 | |
| OK, things that I'm sure the applicant can. | 00:27:56 | |
| Go over in more detail with you. All right, Well, I just want to make sure I understand what I'm looking at on that, so thank you. | 00:27:59 | |
| I think that was all of the. | 00:28:08 | |
| Things that came up from the last meeting. | 00:28:10 | |
| With the question, with the pool that's taken off, that was just kind of a. | 00:28:14 | |
| Idea, but it's not. | 00:28:18 | |
| Not set as a. | 00:28:21 | |
| Determined thing in their plan. | 00:28:23 | |
| One of the lots that is referenced. | 00:28:26 | |
| Is. | 00:28:28 | |
| This lot. | 00:28:31 | |
| Where the front of that can go either way, so there's not a set back that's. | 00:28:32 | |
| Really portrayed on it. | 00:28:37 | |
| Just because there's flexibility there with where that house may end up. | 00:28:39 | |
| OK. And. | 00:28:44 | |
| So on setbacks too, I wanted to go over that as well. | 00:28:48 | |
| And we talked about this a little bit the last time. | 00:28:54 | |
| It's not this one. | 00:28:57 | |
| Utility. | 00:28:59 | |
| I think the pool is still on there, but it's not supposed to be there. | 00:29:08 | |
| We'll include that as removed. | 00:29:12 | |
| Or note that. | 00:29:15 | |
| To ignore the rendering of the pool on page 98. | 00:29:40 | |
| Yeah, there's. | 00:29:45 | |
| It's there on a couple of pages. | 00:29:46 | |
| Results here on this one too. | 00:29:48 | |
| It is conceptual in nature, not. | 00:29:53 | |
| A commitment. | 00:29:57 | |
| OK. | 00:30:02 | |
| Sorry, I'm trying to see where that. | 00:30:07 | |
| Where the setbacks are designated on what sheet? | 00:30:09 | |
| I think it's on this one. | 00:30:15 | |
| No, it's not. | 00:30:21 | |
| So is that anything that needs to be called out in the motion or is that just? | 00:30:23 | |
| Copy paste from the lack lost packet and not. | 00:30:27 | |
| Applicable. | 00:30:30 | |
| I thought that I put the updated. | 00:30:32 | |
| Plans with the applicant provided in the packet. | 00:30:36 | |
| I'll double check that and we can pull them. | 00:30:40 | |
| If needed. | 00:30:43 | |
| OK. | 00:30:54 | |
| So on setbacks, this is where you'll see the narrow set back on this side. | 00:30:59 | |
| And then it increases to 20 feet. | 00:31:03 | |
| Over here. | 00:31:06 | |
| So for the first. | 00:31:07 | |
| 89 feet. | 00:31:12 | |
| Roughly. | 00:31:14 | |
| You'll have a 20 foot set back on that side. | 00:31:15 | |
| And then there's an additional 10 foot set back. | 00:31:18 | |
| We were talking about some of these utility easements the last time. | 00:31:21 | |
| So it's good to point out. | 00:31:24 | |
| Where those utility easements are that there wouldn't be structures within the utility easements. | 00:31:26 | |
| So while this just has a 20 foot set back. | 00:31:31 | |
| With the additional utility easement that has 30 feet. | 00:31:34 | |
| That's detailed in the staff report. It's a little bit closer here and then flares out further. | 00:31:40 | |
| Depending on where that structure. | 00:31:47 | |
| Ends up. | 00:31:49 | |
| This one has a 20 foot set back built in on either side of the road. | 00:31:51 | |
| So this structure could be. | 00:31:57 | |
| Up here more, or it could be down here further. There's not really a front step back on lot #8. | 00:32:00 | |
| 20 foot step back on. | 00:32:07 | |
| The uh. | 00:32:09 | |
| Side umm. | 00:32:10 | |
| That's Holiday Blvd. | 00:32:11 | |
| And then 20 foot set back on this side. | 00:32:13 | |
| And then each of the. | 00:32:16 | |
| Lots have a 5 foot utility easement. | 00:32:18 | |
| Between each of them. | 00:32:23 | |
| And. | 00:32:25 | |
| The utility easement along with a Rd. | 00:32:27 | |
| I think there was a question of the property line along there, so the property is owned to. | 00:32:31 | |
| A to a specific. | 00:32:36 | |
| Line to the middle of the road. | 00:32:39 | |
| The utility easement is set within the road. | 00:32:41 | |
| And. | 00:32:45 | |
| Than the building area is identified as the area that's outside of the road. | 00:32:47 | |
| So the minimum separation between buildings is 10 feet, correct? Because that's where the PU. | 00:32:53 | |
| Mm-hmm. Yes. | 00:32:59 | |
| And then all structures are 100 foot set back from the stream. | 00:33:02 | |
| Yes, or Creek. | 00:33:06 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:33:09 | |
| Without. | 00:33:10 | |
| If this was a standard subdivision or. | 00:33:12 | |
| Standard lot. | 00:33:15 | |
| This would have just a 50 foot set back from the Creek. | 00:33:16 | |
| On this side, because this is a previously developed lot. | 00:33:20 | |
| And then seeing what this parcel. | 00:33:24 | |
| Is that it would have a 50 foot set back. | 00:33:26 | |
| So they're increasing that step back to the full 100 feet. | 00:33:28 | |
| Where it would only have been 50 feet otherwise. | 00:33:32 | |
| If someone were to. | 00:33:35 | |
| Remove the house as is on that parcel. | 00:33:37 | |
| They could build up to 50 feet from the Creek. | 00:33:40 | |
| So, umm. | 00:33:43 | |
| That's where that extra. | 00:33:44 | |
| Area that they are not required to have in there they could. | 00:33:46 | |
| Jog in that protection area. | 00:33:50 | |
| 50 feet for each of those parcels, but they just. | 00:33:52 | |
| Included it as 100 feet. | 00:33:55 | |
| So additional. | 00:33:57 | |
| 50 feet across both of those parcels. | 00:33:58 | |
| And that's what's. | 00:34:01 | |
| Called out in the. | 00:34:02 | |
| PUD, yes. | 00:34:05 | |
| Application. | 00:34:07 | |
| All right. Any other questions because I know we're overdue to get our meeting started. Just one question, when were the adjacent | 00:34:10 | |
| property? | 00:34:13 | |
| Owners noticed. | 00:34:16 | |
| They were noticed. | 00:34:19 | |
| We sent out an initial notice before we did the. | 00:34:21 | |
| The zone map boundary. | 00:34:25 | |
| So they had a notice in. | 00:34:27 | |
| July. | 00:34:29 | |
| So the end of July. | 00:34:30 | |
| Than we did the. | 00:34:32 | |
| Hearing the 12th of. | 00:34:36 | |
| August. | 00:34:40 | |
| So they were noticed for that. | 00:34:40 | |
| And then we sent out a notice for the first meeting. | 00:34:43 | |
| And then sent out a meeting a notice for this second meeting. | 00:34:47 | |
| So they have had. | 00:34:50 | |
| 3 notices for the same project and there was number response. | 00:34:52 | |
| Yep, no comments. | 00:34:57 | |
| Thank you. | 00:34:58 | |
| Alrighty, well with that, unless there's any other questions about this, we'll get the work session closed. Anyone need a quick? | 00:35:00 | |
| Break before we roll into the official meeting. | 00:35:08 | |
| Everybody good. | 00:35:10 | |
| OK, so with that, you let me know. We were good to go, Kerry. | 00:35:11 | |
| Yeah, we are good to go. | 00:35:17 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. | 00:35:19 | |
| So good evening and welcome to the Holiday City Planning Commission. It is 6:10. Thanks for your patience if you've been waiting | 00:35:20 | |
| on us. | 00:35:24 | |
| Um, we have. | 00:35:27 | |
| All but the newest member of commissioners in attendance city staff. | 00:35:30 | |
| And council. | 00:35:35 | |
| And we have. | 00:35:36 | |
| Five items on the agenda. | 00:35:38 | |
| Four of them public hearings. | 00:35:40 | |
| And before we get going and working through all of those, I have asked Vice Chair Prince if she would read the opening statement | 00:35:42 | |
| for any members of the public. | 00:35:46 | |
| The City of Holiday Planning Commission is a volunteer citizen board whose function is to review land use plans and other special | 00:35:51 | |
| studies. | 00:35:55 | |
| Make recommendations to the City Council on proposed zoning map and ordinance changes. | 00:35:59 | |
| And approve conditional uses in subdivisions. | 00:36:04 | |
| The Planning Commission does not initiate land use applications. | 00:36:08 | |
| Rather, acts on applications as they are submitted. | 00:36:11 | |
| Commissioners do not meet with applicants except at publicly noticed meetings. | 00:36:15 | |
| Commissioners attempt to visit each property on the agenda where the location. | 00:36:19 | |
| The nature of the neighborhood. Existing structures. | 00:36:24 | |
| And uses related to the proposed change are noted. | 00:36:27 | |
| Decisions are based on observations, recommendations from the professional planning staff. | 00:36:31 | |
| The city's general plan, zoning ordinance and other reports. | 00:36:36 | |
| By all verbal and written comments and by evidence submitted. | 00:36:40 | |
| All of which are part of the public record. | 00:36:44 | |
| Thank you very much. | 00:36:47 | |
| All right. And with that, the first item we have on our agenda tonight is an acknowledgment of service. | 00:36:49 | |
| For former Commissioner Gingerville Chinsky. | 00:36:55 | |
| Commission just wants to recognize the time that she served as a planning commissioner and thank her for. | 00:37:00 | |
| Her efforts and all the time she's given to the community. | 00:37:06 | |
| And helping helping. | 00:37:10 | |
| Make holiday a great place to live. | 00:37:12 | |
| So. | 00:37:14 | |
| Ginger if you're watching. | 00:37:19 | |
| All right. And then we have our first public hearing item on here, which is the David McDonald Historic Home. | 00:37:21 | |
| And Miss Marsh, I'm not going to call you up to the podium because you got all your stuff set up there, but if you want to give us | 00:37:30 | |
| just a quick rundown on this. | 00:37:34 | |
| Absolutely. | 00:37:38 | |
| All right. | 00:37:42 | |
| This is our newest. | 00:37:43 | |
| Historic house or site designation? It was just designated through the City Council on Thursday. | 00:37:46 | |
| Last week. | 00:37:52 | |
| This property is known as the David McDonald House. It's located at 4659 S Highland Drive. | 00:37:53 | |
| Has been used as offices and. | 00:38:01 | |
| Umm residential treatment facility for some time. | 00:38:04 | |
| And is now going through the process to be designated as a historic property and make some modifications to. | 00:38:08 | |
| For new use. | 00:38:15 | |
| And some improvements to the to the property. | 00:38:17 | |
| The first couple of pages review what is in. | 00:38:23 | |
| The historic code. | 00:38:27 | |
| For the city. | 00:38:29 | |
| A review of uses as to what uses would be. | 00:38:32 | |
| Conditional within the. | 00:38:36 | |
| In a historic. | 00:38:38 | |
| Site other uses of similar intensity to the above. | 00:38:39 | |
| It is being proposed for use as a jewelry store. | 00:38:44 | |
| Doing custom jewelry, very low scale. | 00:38:48 | |
| Very similar to an antique shop or art shop. | 00:38:51 | |
| The site does have limited parking. | 00:38:55 | |
| The property owners seeking to improve some of the parking there both with. | 00:38:58 | |
| Refinishing the parking lot and adding some additional parking spots to. | 00:39:02 | |
| Meet the requirements for. | 00:39:06 | |
| Their use. | 00:39:08 | |
| The staff report goes through some of the. | 00:39:11 | |
| Historic details of the property. | 00:39:14 | |
| Was built in 1890. | 00:39:16 | |
| By David and Arabella McDonald. | 00:39:18 | |
| They immigrated to Utah from Scotland in 1869. | 00:39:20 | |
| David was with Blacksmith and his black ship. | 00:39:25 | |
| Smith's shop was located. | 00:39:28 | |
| Close to the property. | 00:39:30 | |
| Family has owned. | 00:39:33 | |
| The house. For quite some time they lived there. | 00:39:35 | |
| Or David and Arabelle lived there until 1912. | 00:39:39 | |
| And, umm. | 00:39:41 | |
| My understanding is that family members continue to own the house. | 00:39:43 | |
| Through umm. | 00:39:46 | |
| I believe that. | 00:39:48 | |
| Nineties 2000s of. | 00:39:49 | |
| Applicant can. | 00:39:52 | |
| Summarize some of that for you too. | 00:39:53 | |
| There's you can see the original. | 00:39:56 | |
| Picture of the house. | 00:39:59 | |
| And some modifications that were made in 1912 with adding a porch. | 00:40:00 | |
| The on the rear side of the property. | 00:40:06 | |
| Currently there is a. | 00:40:10 | |
| Rear porch. | 00:40:14 | |
| Likely in the. | 00:40:17 | |
| 60s, maybe earlier. | 00:40:19 | |
| It could have been earlier. | 00:40:22 | |
| There's not really a known date on when a rare addition was made. | 00:40:23 | |
| But it was definitely present in 1977. | 00:40:27 | |
| So the applicant is proposing some changes to that as there's some structural issues. | 00:40:32 | |
| This rear. | 00:40:37 | |
| And closure. | 00:40:39 | |
| So they're proposing to. | 00:40:40 | |
| Remove that and modify it to address the structural issues and add a second level as a sunroom. | 00:40:43 | |
| Other modifications. | 00:40:51 | |
| Are to the front of the house. | 00:40:53 | |
| With adding some Ada access. | 00:40:56 | |
| And a porch so they'll have ADA access off to this front side. | 00:41:01 | |
| Porch to cover that. | 00:41:06 | |
| Access around. | 00:41:08 | |
| Similar to the Porsche that was added on in 1912. | 00:41:10 | |
| The windows will all be changed out for security and also energy efficiency reasons there. | 00:41:16 | |
| Adding these paned windows styles. | 00:41:23 | |
| The frame of the window is not changing at all, so we'll still have the upper. | 00:41:26 | |
| Area. That's a solid. | 00:41:31 | |
| Surface. There are stained glass windows here and here, and I believe those are. | 00:41:34 | |
| Both stay, but you can clarify that with the applicant since they're not shown in this architectural drawing. | 00:41:40 | |
| Some modifications, just generally to landscaping. | 00:41:47 | |
| There were two large pine trees in the front. | 00:41:50 | |
| Of the property. | 00:41:53 | |
| There's power lines there, so replacing those with tall trees might be difficult, but. | 00:41:54 | |
| The applicant may be open to replacing with some smaller trees in the front yard. | 00:42:00 | |
| I'm trying to think what else we had in here. | 00:42:05 | |
| Oh, the other notable piece is that. | 00:42:09 | |
| There has historically been this Trump piece below. | 00:42:13 | |
| Below the roofline. | 00:42:20 | |
| You can discuss with the applicant about. | 00:42:22 | |
| Openness to modify to including that in. | 00:42:25 | |
| In their modifications. | 00:42:29 | |
| The other. | 00:42:31 | |
| Review or the other item noted. | 00:42:33 | |
| By the director was. | 00:42:37 | |
| That was a second level edition with the. | 00:42:42 | |
| Sun Sun porch. | 00:42:45 | |
| Freeze from the upper cornice. | 00:42:47 | |
| And then the scale of the columns supporting the front porch, so we can go back to that. | 00:42:49 | |
| Architectural Drawing. | 00:42:55 | |
| And take a look at the rear. | 00:42:58 | |
| The other note in the historic registry. | 00:43:01 | |
| The fence that's on the site was. | 00:43:05 | |
| Originally constructed I believe in 1912. You could see in that photo. | 00:43:07 | |
| A suggestion to possibly include that on the site somewhere. | 00:43:13 | |
| If it's not going to be used in the front of the site to incorporate it since it is noted on the historic registers being. | 00:43:18 | |
| Originally, umm. | 00:43:25 | |
| Created for the house. | 00:43:27 | |
| This is the elevation of the rear. | 00:43:31 | |
| Side so we can see. | 00:43:34 | |
| That rear addition? | 00:43:36 | |
| Being updated. | 00:43:39 | |
| More structurally, sound will actually have a foundation instead of just being poured on. | 00:43:40 | |
| S Lab on grade. | 00:43:45 | |
| And then the sun porch about the front. | 00:43:46 | |
| Or above. | 00:43:48 | |
| You can still see some of the windows through that. | 00:43:50 | |
| Glass that retains the look of. | 00:43:53 | |
| Some of the brick. | 00:43:54 | |
| Any questions from the Commission on? | 00:43:56 | |
| Items in the staff report. | 00:44:00 | |
| Just a. | 00:44:04 | |
| Clarifying, maybe this is a question better for the applicant, but. | 00:44:05 | |
| In the register. | 00:44:08 | |
| In the renderings, it does look like there is a. | 00:44:09 | |
| An iron fence, is it not? | 00:44:12 | |
| The same fence that's. | 00:44:14 | |
| They're currently. | 00:44:16 | |
| On this one. | 00:44:17 | |
| It might just be a rendering. It might be the same fence that. | 00:44:19 | |
| You can have that. | 00:44:22 | |
| And there is. | 00:44:24 | |
| A list of suggested findings from the TRC. | 00:44:26 | |
| Are those? | 00:44:31 | |
| All things that need to be covered with the applicant or are those already worked out in the attached? | 00:44:32 | |
| August 28. | 00:44:39 | |
| Addendum with. | 00:44:43 | |
| John Tierlink. | 00:44:45 | |
| Most of those. | 00:44:48 | |
| Findings are taken from the. | 00:44:49 | |
| Applicants narrative or letter of intent. | 00:44:52 | |
| And then with some of the details that were provided from the contractor as to the scope of the work. | 00:44:55 | |
| Umm, it is. | 00:45:01 | |
| If there's any modifications to those findings. | 00:45:04 | |
| You could go through each of those with the applicant and just make sure that they're. | 00:45:08 | |
| In agreeance with each of those or any of those need to be modified. | 00:45:11 | |
| OK. | 00:45:17 | |
| So that's the applicant property summary. I'm talking about the suggested findings under the technical review committee those, | 00:45:19 | |
| yes. | 00:45:22 | |
| I don't want to spend all night going back and forth looking at each one. I'm just curious, is there anything that's listed in | 00:45:28 | |
| here that's not? | 00:45:31 | |
| In the summarized narrative on this last page. | 00:45:36 | |
| That we need to. The other thing would just be trees. | 00:45:39 | |
| If you want to include that as a condition. | 00:45:42 | |
| The trees. | 00:45:44 | |
| OK. And as far as the? | 00:45:46 | |
| And then the. | 00:45:51 | |
| What is it called? The Freesia? | 00:45:53 | |
| Oh, the fruity frizzy is the right pronunciation. | 00:45:54 | |
| I am not an architect. | 00:45:58 | |
| I don't know. I'm not revenge. | 00:46:00 | |
| All right. Any other questions for city staff on this? | 00:46:05 | |
| Do we want to invite the applicant up to give additional? | 00:46:09 | |
| Q&A for us. | 00:46:12 | |
| Hopefully more a. | 00:46:16 | |
| How are we? | 00:46:17 | |
| If I answer your first question, my name is John Brooks Branscomb. I'm the owner of J Brooks Jewelers. | 00:46:21 | |
| Sorry, Mr. Branscomb, will you hit that power button on the top edge of that? | 00:46:26 | |
| Right there. | 00:46:30 | |
| Thank you. | 00:46:32 | |
| I don't know if I hit it right or not. Here we go, Kerry. | 00:46:33 | |
| I see it now. | 00:46:35 | |
| Can you hear me better now? | 00:46:35 | |
| OK, my name is John Brooks Transcom, the owner of Jay Brooks Jewelers and. | 00:46:37 | |
| We've been looking at this building for about a year. | 00:46:41 | |
| And finally decided to buy it. To answer your first question, if I tried to remove that fence in the front, my wife would divorce | 00:46:44 | |
| me. | 00:46:47 | |
| So that will definitely be part of. | 00:46:51 | |
| All of it because of the way the architect wants to build a little entrance there. They'll probably have some room on each side | 00:46:53 | |
| that will take the extra extension of that. | 00:46:56 | |
| Have to be removed, repaired, patched and then reinstalled. | 00:47:00 | |
| But when we're finished, our intention is to. | 00:47:04 | |
| Use that exactly the way it is, and then to mimic that up on the porch when we add the other. | 00:47:07 | |
| Pieces. | 00:47:14 | |
| We thought adding the porch made the most sense because there have been a porch for so many years. | 00:47:15 | |
| And then for the continuity and especially for the. | 00:47:19 | |
| Ada ramp. It made sense to. | 00:47:22 | |
| Cover it. | 00:47:25 | |
| So if somebody doesn't walk outside. | 00:47:26 | |
| And our weather and. | 00:47:28 | |
| That would be a bad thing, so. | 00:47:29 | |
| So that's the thing we want to do because the trees were so big and the ground. | 00:47:32 | |
| To our knowledge, has not been watered in five years. | 00:47:36 | |
| They were dead. | 00:47:39 | |
| And as much as I love trees, I'm from North Carolina. | 00:47:40 | |
| There's just no way to save them and make it look right. | 00:47:44 | |
| But the architect assures me that if we need to plant more trees that we can incorporate trees easily into the plan. | 00:47:46 | |
| Would they be big? | 00:47:53 | |
| No, you know. | 00:47:54 | |
| But I think that we will. | 00:47:56 | |
| You know, build some. We haven't done the architectural plan for the landscaping yet, correct? | 00:47:58 | |
| But. | 00:48:02 | |
| We're very open to making sure everybody. | 00:48:04 | |
| You know, loves what we do as far as that goes. | 00:48:06 | |
| On that subject, on the back because of parking. | 00:48:09 | |
| There's an old abandoned. | 00:48:12 | |
| In the back there there's an old abandoned. | 00:48:15 | |
| Canal that hasn't had water in it for 30 years. It's blocked on the bank side. | 00:48:18 | |
| And then under the on the holiday condominium side, it goes under the driveway but has no water in it and. | 00:48:24 | |
| The 90 year old great granddaughter came in there and told us it used to be a pond with Swans. | 00:48:30 | |
| That, that's a Galaxy gone by. | 00:48:35 | |
| So we have the surveyor been out this last week. | 00:48:38 | |
| Include where the property line really is. | 00:48:42 | |
| Because there's two fences with the canal in between. | 00:48:45 | |
| And so once we get that up if the. | 00:48:49 | |
| And the holiday and the condominiums behind us, they're willing to sell whatever we need. | 00:48:52 | |
| To build some additional diagonal parking. | 00:48:56 | |
| Behind the building. | 00:48:58 | |
| Without really changing from the front, you would notice it at all, and there's. | 00:49:00 | |
| A lot more room over in the corner next to the bank than you might realize where we can hide A. | 00:49:03 | |
| Dumpster and things like that without him being really seen. | 00:49:10 | |
| So there's a. | 00:49:13 | |
| There's a lot more room when you get into this corner than you might think, and again with the condominiums there. | 00:49:14 | |
| Happy to anything they don't have to take care of. | 00:49:19 | |
| They're happy to sell and get rid of off of their plate. | 00:49:22 | |
| So we're just waiting for the. | 00:49:25 | |
| Surveyor to come through and to do that. | 00:49:27 | |
| In the end, we're. | 00:49:30 | |
| We're all about life celebrations as a business. | 00:49:32 | |
| And creating. | 00:49:35 | |
| Lifetime memories. So the last thing we want to do. | 00:49:36 | |
| Is change the look of this home so much that you wouldn't recognize it? | 00:49:39 | |
| The McDonald children grant great grandchildren who were 80. | 00:49:43 | |
| 88 and 90 came by the store over the last 3-4 weeks. We've met them all. | 00:49:47 | |
| And they're so excited. | 00:49:52 | |
| In fact, one of the great granddaughters painted this picture that's up on the screen. | 00:49:54 | |
| And she said that there's. | 00:49:58 | |
| He said they're so excited that the house is going to be used and returned to its former. | 00:50:00 | |
| For lack of a better term, glory. | 00:50:04 | |
| The way that it looks. | 00:50:06 | |
| The. | 00:50:08 | |
| The the back porch just by way of information according to the. | 00:50:10 | |
| In 1941, when he was born, he said that back porch has been there as an open porch his entire life. | 00:50:15 | |
| And he has no memory of it not being there. | 00:50:21 | |
| And nor did his two great his sisters, who are 90 and 8889. They said that's been there forever. | 00:50:24 | |
| And that before it was open. | 00:50:30 | |
| And that's where she hit all the treats. | 00:50:31 | |
| So they would sit on the back porch. | 00:50:33 | |
| Unfortunately. | 00:50:36 | |
| We want to add. | 00:50:38 | |
| Because the room is limited, we want to add a vault. | 00:50:39 | |
| In that and those vaults weigh. | 00:50:42 | |
| You know, 8 to 10,000 lbs. | 00:50:44 | |
| And so the foundation, as Kerry explained so well, is just not, doesn't tolerate it. | 00:50:47 | |
| So the only way to fix it is to tear it off. | 00:50:52 | |
| And rebuild it. | 00:50:55 | |
| And while we're turning it off and rebuild it, it made sense. | 00:50:56 | |
| To build this little porch. | 00:50:59 | |
| For lots of different usages and social events and promotions that we would plan to do. | 00:51:02 | |
| Over the time. | 00:51:08 | |
| As far as impact, we're a low impact user, nothing like the coffee shop a block to our South. | 00:51:09 | |
| Which is probably having 3 or 405 hundred cars a day. | 00:51:14 | |
| We're probably a 15 to 20 car a day kind of business. | 00:51:18 | |
| And we do intend to keep the drive up window for as a. | 00:51:24 | |
| Trying to work it into our and our model of business which is different as a pickup window. | 00:51:28 | |
| So when people have three kids in the car and don't want to get or it's bad weather or whatever the scenario might be. | 00:51:32 | |
| So we would probably leave that alone. That's kind of our plan. | 00:51:38 | |
| Is the only one like it in the state, and that would be kind of. | 00:51:42 | |
| Fun so. | 00:51:44 | |
| In a nutshell, that connects. | 00:51:46 | |
| Is the. | 00:51:48 | |
| We had the driveway. | 00:51:50 | |
| We have the foundation examined as you know, the foundation. | 00:51:52 | |
| Made it through an earthquake. | 00:51:56 | |
| Didn't have any issues. | 00:51:58 | |
| And. | 00:52:00 | |
| With the exception of a small retaining wall. | 00:52:01 | |
| The previous owner. | 00:52:04 | |
| Swears that the inside has looked like that his entire 31 years he owned the building. | 00:52:07 | |
| And. | 00:52:13 | |
| And that the. | 00:52:14 | |
| The paving company promises that they won't be bringing in any 10 ton bulldozers to do anything that we have to worry about. | 00:52:16 | |
| Those kind of things. | 00:52:25 | |
| And so they're standing by. We have removed. | 00:52:26 | |
| A number of trees forward, completely dead. | 00:52:29 | |
| Getting ready to fall in the house. | 00:52:32 | |
| The rest of them we just removed all the four. | 00:52:33 | |
| And we clean it up. So if you have a chance, do you want to drive through? There is a dumpster back there, so don't go speeding on | 00:52:36 | |
| a big circle. | 00:52:39 | |
| But it is we started the process of cleaning it up and. | 00:52:42 | |
| And just getting ready. We didn't really want to do too much until you said. | 00:52:46 | |
| You can have a conditional use permit. | 00:52:50 | |
| And use this space. | 00:52:52 | |
| And so we want to. | 00:52:54 | |
| We want to be good neighbors. We I live in Mill Creek just. | 00:52:55 | |
| Three blocks to the due West of exactly where the building is. | 00:52:59 | |
| We want to. | 00:53:03 | |
| Return it to it, the beauty. | 00:53:04 | |
| House has been empty for five years, the. | 00:53:06 | |
| Took 25 people to clean up the lot but it was just a mess. | 00:53:09 | |
| And so I think when we're finished, I think it will be just as beautiful as the renditions. | 00:53:13 | |
| Do. Our architect and designer are both amazing and. | 00:53:17 | |
| And I think. | 00:53:21 | |
| The building that's down on Highland a little further, the brand new building is down between 33rd, 39th and 33rd with the. | 00:53:23 | |
| All the brick and all the beautiful landscaping with the. | 00:53:31 | |
| The white blue, that's kind of the look where we're going to go is kind of a Southern. | 00:53:34 | |
| Flavor just a little bit. | 00:53:37 | |
| And I think when we're finished, it would be beautiful. | 00:53:40 | |
| That's a quick summary. I think of everything that. | 00:53:44 | |
| I heard but I'm happy to answer any question and the architect is here. | 00:53:46 | |
| Who's happy to answer any technical question. | 00:53:50 | |
| So you're amenable to having a couple. | 00:53:52 | |
| Calling their trees up. | 00:53:55 | |
| In that front that I'm sure you. | 00:53:57 | |
| I'm sure that there would be something that would be skinny and linear. | 00:53:59 | |
| So Cory, do you have any spouse on that? | 00:54:08 | |
| I would be I would caution against the. | 00:54:13 | |
| What we'd be looking for? | 00:54:17 | |
| Is the design concept for that area is a very automatic here? | 00:54:19 | |
| European style garden. | 00:54:24 | |
| Brick walkways. | 00:54:29 | |
| Gardens. | 00:54:30 | |
| I pretty much get too much of A tree that actually block or. | 00:54:32 | |
| Take out too much of that. | 00:54:37 | |
| We haven't gotten. | 00:54:40 | |
| Project as well. | 00:54:50 | |
| Place that if you're not. | 00:54:51 | |
| Speedrite bias so. | 00:54:54 | |
| But we are mentioned. Why? | 00:54:57 | |
| Create a landscape plan that is very upscale and celebratory to. | 00:55:06 | |
| Makes sense? | 00:55:12 | |
| Just ask because you know, we're Tree City and I'm sure on the way. | 00:55:14 | |
| Evening or western afternoon sun in the summer. You know, it's nice to have some shade on that building, but. | 00:55:18 | |
| Understandable. | 00:55:25 | |
| You know, with the limitations of the landscape. | 00:55:26 | |
| Umm, as I'm looking at the suggested conditions of approval that are under the TRC, sounds like retention of the fence is planned | 00:55:30 | |
| and you're good with that one. | 00:55:34 | |
| It's listed as no improvements within 20 feet of the canal on the east side of the property. | 00:55:40 | |
| So it sounds like you're kind of. | 00:55:45 | |
| Loose on what's going to happen with that or. | 00:55:48 | |
| Well. | 00:55:50 | |
| I did not read that. | 00:55:54 | |
| So we want to. | 00:55:56 | |
| What we want to do to make it work? | 00:55:57 | |
| Have enough retail parking? | 00:55:59 | |
| Is we want to pay from the back of the house, from the building all the way to the fence line? | 00:56:00 | |
| Where the condominiums? | 00:56:06 | |
| Densly. Currently. | 00:56:08 | |
| And that allows us to the room. | 00:56:09 | |
| To be able to park additional cars so we have enough. | 00:56:11 | |
| Parking stalls relative to the amount of space we have, which is about 2500 feet. | 00:56:15 | |
| And so if we don't. | 00:56:20 | |
| We have to be if we don't pave over that canal which is talking to. | 00:56:21 | |
| One of our friends who's a former water. | 00:56:26 | |
| Specialist has talked to. | 00:56:29 | |
| Everybody who's involved in that and no one thinks that canal is an active canal in any form or fashion. | 00:56:31 | |
| And so the only question was who owns it? | 00:56:36 | |
| And so whether is it us or is it the? | 00:56:39 | |
| Condominium County. So one of the one of the things that would be essential is for us to be able to pave. | 00:56:42 | |
| Back to that, because right now all they've used for for the last 30 years is to dump. | 00:56:47 | |
| And we we've the clippings of every tree for 30 years is in that. | 00:56:52 | |
| Things that we've taken out. | 00:56:57 | |
| And that the space is much bigger than we thought. | 00:56:59 | |
| So if the surveyors come back, then it works easily enough and the. | 00:57:02 | |
| Baby Company's already been there, Kilgore Company and said no problem to do it, no problem to change anything. No trees need to | 00:57:06 | |
| be removed, which is good. | 00:57:10 | |
| Just a little trimming, which most of that's done. | 00:57:15 | |
| So how far is the? | 00:57:17 | |
| Canal from the building. | 00:57:19 | |
| Your I would say 10. | 00:57:21 | |
| Yeah. | 00:57:27 | |
| Probably 24 feet. | 00:57:30 | |
| From the back kitchen. | 00:57:31 | |
| That's why we had the property surveyed this. | 00:57:42 | |
| So we could try and reconcile to have. | 00:57:45 | |
| As we do understand. | 00:57:48 | |
| There are two fences there, just don't know which ones which. | 00:57:49 | |
| And how long the expenses have also been there? | 00:57:52 | |
| Purposes to it is. | 00:57:56 | |
| So we have. We're trying to do that. | 00:58:02 | |
| So, Carrie, have you looked at the? | 00:58:07 | |
| How they're gonna park here? | 00:58:08 | |
| So parking. | 00:58:11 | |
| Would just be. | 00:58:13 | |
| Based off of the use. | 00:58:14 | |
| If they're going to add some parking in the back. | 00:58:15 | |
| I would say that. | 00:58:18 | |
| Reasonable condition would be just a. | 00:58:20 | |
| Following uh. | 00:58:22 | |
| Code for. | 00:58:23 | |
| Waterway protection. | 00:58:26 | |
| So that requires. | 00:58:27 | |
| A property owner to work with the canal company if there's any modifications made. | 00:58:31 | |
| Within a. | 00:58:36 | |
| Canal area. So if it is an abandoned canal. | 00:58:37 | |
| Then they work that out. We have verification that that it is an abandoned canal. | 00:58:40 | |
| Then the waterway protection. | 00:58:47 | |
| Don't believe would apply in that case. | 00:58:51 | |
| Waterway protection is we're about 20 foot distance comes in. | 00:58:53 | |
| It is to protect banks. | 00:58:57 | |
| From erosion and to maintain trees. | 00:58:59 | |
| Along canals so that they remain. | 00:59:02 | |
| Have good integrity. | 00:59:07 | |
| In their bank, but. | 00:59:09 | |
| So conditions could be. | 00:59:10 | |
| Just compliance with waterway protection. | 00:59:13 | |
| And also complaints with. | 00:59:16 | |
| Tree canopy sustainability. So any trace that? | 00:59:18 | |
| Are removed. | 00:59:21 | |
| If that canal is abandoned if the waterway protection doesn't apply. | 00:59:22 | |
| If trees are removed. | 00:59:26 | |
| Then they'd have to be replaced with a mature canopy of equivalent size. | 00:59:28 | |
| Either on the property or up to 50% could be located off the property. | 00:59:34 | |
| Parking wise another option if there's not. | 00:59:39 | |
| Enough parking or a way to locate parking on site They. | 00:59:44 | |
| There's a potential to explore shared parking. | 00:59:48 | |
| Potentially with the neighboring business next door for any overflow parking if they do a shared parking agreement and that's in | 00:59:52 | |
| our. | 00:59:55 | |
| Parking standards code. | 00:59:59 | |
| So that is an option for the applicant that could just be that's. | 01:00:01 | |
| Kind of included in the general standards or conditions with just meeting the parking requirements so there's. | 01:00:06 | |
| Various ways the applicant can achieve that. | 01:00:13 | |
| And if they're going to expand the parking lot, there's already a code requiring 3 islands and those sort of things if they're | 01:00:15 | |
| going to expand the existing parking lot, right? | 01:00:19 | |
| OK. So Kerry, just to clarify for me. | 01:00:25 | |
| Didn't understand but. | 01:00:27 | |
| Is the existing parking enough for the use but the applicant wants more parking? Or in order to do this use, more parking is | 01:00:29 | |
| required? | 01:00:32 | |
| Do you have one parking spot on site or two? | 01:00:36 | |
| There's 7 stalls, 7 stalls currently. | 01:00:39 | |
| The parking is based off of the. | 01:00:42 | |
| Square footage. | 01:00:46 | |
| I believe that 7 would be. | 01:00:47 | |
| Adequate. I haven't done a full parking assessment on it. | 01:00:49 | |
| Do you know how many square feet? | 01:00:54 | |
| 25125 hundred. | 01:00:58 | |
| That sounds like 7 would be. | 01:01:01 | |
| Pretty close to what they would need. | 01:01:03 | |
| So it's so the expansion of the parking would be to accommodate. | 01:01:05 | |
| What they're anticipating, but not. | 01:01:09 | |
| We wouldn't need more. | 01:01:12 | |
| If we want to approve this because it's already right, I don't. I don't know if it needs to be that detailed. | 01:01:14 | |
| Just having the condition of meeting parking standards will take care of them. | 01:01:20 | |
| OK. | 01:01:24 | |
| Right. And a couple other questions on the. | 01:01:26 | |
| I'm going to say it wrong again. The freesia. The free. | 01:01:31 | |
| Frise, that's it. I call it exterior crown molding. Are you guys going to hold on to that? | 01:01:34 | |
| Tell us how to pronounce it too when you come up. | 01:01:43 | |
| It might be easier for me to come up to the podium. My name is Corey Solomon. Thank architecture. | 01:01:46 | |
| Here I am the architect assisting John and Victoria on the project. | 01:01:52 | |
| The overall goal is yes to maintain and repair. | 01:01:58 | |
| The freeze board that is at the soffit. | 01:02:02 | |
| At the top area, we are going to have to modify a little bit of the window trim as we make those replacements. | 01:02:05 | |
| To a new thermally broken. | 01:02:12 | |
| Windows system with the grids in it. | 01:02:16 | |
| But overall, our goal is again to maintain as much of the existing. | 01:02:18 | |
| Element that we possibly can. | 01:02:23 | |
| With the understanding that there might be parts of it that are just. | 01:02:25 | |
| So far gone that we're going to have to. | 01:02:29 | |
| Refabricate and rebuild. | 01:02:32 | |
| To make that work, but that's our overall goal, is not to remove any historical elements like that, but only to enhance them. | 01:02:36 | |
| So whatever you can't keep, you're intending to. | 01:02:42 | |
| Remake and replace. | 01:02:45 | |
| Yes we can. We can just have it remade. | 01:02:47 | |
| OK. | 01:02:49 | |
| That's just on our little checklist of items, so thank you for covering that. | 01:02:51 | |
| And and then also maybe I could why I'm standing here as well as to talk to you a little bit what the fence is going on and why | 01:02:56 | |
| we. | 01:02:59 | |
| The element. | 01:03:04 | |
| That's on your screens right there is a Roper Ogul is again to take the existing historical fence and reuse that on the two sides | 01:03:05 | |
| of the pillars. The reason why we broke that is when we wanted to create a strong. | 01:03:11 | |
| Entry marquee and element with some lanterns on top of those Piers. | 01:03:18 | |
| But also some of the fancies in really poor shape. | 01:03:23 | |
| It's rusted all the way through and so we're. | 01:03:27 | |
| Trying to account for those what we thought was the linear length of those sections that might not be able to be reusable. | 01:03:30 | |
| And to them rebuild those new entry gates that. | 01:03:35 | |
| We found it especially towards the. | 01:03:38 | |
| The north side. | 01:03:42 | |
| Of it is at the base of it's pretty rotten, so. | 01:03:44 | |
| We're going to have to really try to save some of that and work with it, but our goal is we love the fence. | 01:03:47 | |
| His wife loves the fence and we want to keep it. | 01:03:52 | |
| Just enhance it. | 01:03:54 | |
| And then while you're up here, maybe you can just answer this one. | 01:03:56 | |
| The scale of the columns that are going to be supporting that French porch. | 01:03:59 | |
| Any idea about how big those are right now? I could talk to you about the scale. They're probably about 14 by 14, very historical. | 01:04:03 | |
| And the nature and scale of those. | 01:04:10 | |
| We could probably put a conditional work with staff on those, but there will work with the proportions so they're not your little | 01:04:14 | |
| spindly. | 01:04:17 | |
| 6 by 6 that might. Our intent is their built up column. | 01:04:21 | |
| Box column with several pieces of trim and finished out. | 01:04:25 | |
| As well. And that was our. | 01:04:30 | |
| Our overall goal again too, is also. | 01:04:32 | |
| Create that long entry porch that was a little bit more historical. The original home didn't have a porch, there was one added to | 01:04:34 | |
| it later. | 01:04:38 | |
| And we actually, in looking at, we felt like this. | 01:04:42 | |
| Actually complemented the home a little bit more, but it also helped us protect that. | 01:04:46 | |
| The ramps that we are planning to add for the wheelchair accessible to accessibility to the front door. | 01:04:50 | |
| I've got a question about the columns in the depiction that we're seeing on the screen. These look like round. | 01:04:58 | |
| I'm thinking Grecian columns which is not the same as a. | 01:05:06 | |
| Box column. | 01:05:10 | |
| Oh, you know what? Actually, that was Vic. | 01:05:11 | |
| We she requested that we change them to a. | 01:05:14 | |
| Historically round column, which is also again an Eastern architecture. | 01:05:17 | |
| Element. | 01:05:22 | |
| Is it? Is it congruous with the this time period? | 01:05:23 | |
| OK, very much so. | 01:05:26 | |
| OK, OK. | 01:05:29 | |
| I think it looks nice, it's just. | 01:05:30 | |
| Is it the time? Well, quick hammer all the questions. Those are just the ones that I had literally printed and given to me. So. | 01:05:33 | |
| Yeah. Thank you for actually picking up on that. That was a last minute revision that was made a week or so ago. | 01:05:38 | |
| Stained glass. I know there's stained glass currently in the. | 01:05:44 | |
| Home and then it's not shown in the depictions. Will the stained glass stay? Yes, the the stained glass we want to keep on the | 01:05:48 | |
| House now. | 01:05:53 | |
| What we still have to work through is that those stained glass modules are going to be a little different than the new glass. | 01:05:58 | |
| So our overall goal is to. | 01:06:03 | |
| Hopefully get the window manufacturer work with us where we can reinsert that stained glass. If not, we'll. | 01:06:06 | |
| Want to reuse it on the interior of the project. | 01:06:12 | |
| Right. | 01:06:27 | |
| Well, they're pretty. | 01:06:29 | |
| Really pretty. | 01:06:30 | |
| Thank you. | 01:06:31 | |
| Other questions for the applicant. | 01:06:33 | |
| I just have a comment. | 01:06:35 | |
| While I appreciate the fact that every retailer wants maximum visibility for their storefront. | 01:06:38 | |
| Given that we are Tree City, USA, I don't think it's unreasonable. | 01:06:45 | |
| For us to include. | 01:06:50 | |
| As a condition of approval. | 01:06:52 | |
| A couple of columnar trees in the front of the pole. | 01:06:54 | |
| Property I appreciate. | 01:06:57 | |
| The aesthetic of a. | 01:07:00 | |
| Of a European garden look and I think it's really pretty, but I don't think it would be. | 01:07:03 | |
| Upset by a couple of columnar trees. | 01:07:08 | |
| You know, when you talk about a calmer tree, those are very different. Are you talking about a content? | 01:07:11 | |
| Conifer or deciduous tree? | 01:07:16 | |
| You could go. | 01:07:19 | |
| Either or really. With that you could do it. Or fruit tree or something vertical. | 01:07:20 | |
| I mean, you could do because of the power line conflict. You're not Bauer. | 01:07:25 | |
| Burying the power lines. Otherwise I'd say put in, you know, some cottonwoods and really go for the historical look. But I think | 01:07:28 | |
| you could go in there and put in a couple columnar beach, for example. | 01:07:33 | |
| They're, you know, not a whole lot wider than the columns you're talking about putting in there. And again, that green space helps | 01:07:39 | |
| soften the noise island and heat island that we have. | 01:07:43 | |
| Along the Highland corridor. | 01:07:48 | |
| Yeah. And I don't think we could that's we're not going to be opposed to something like that as long as we're complying with it. | 01:07:50 | |
| We also have a ton of trees on this site. | 01:07:54 | |
| All the way around the North. | 01:08:00 | |
| Side, the South side and the east side so. | 01:08:01 | |
| Keep something that's really clean. But we could definitely investigate some calamari trees without hopefully disrupting it too | 01:08:06 | |
| much. And that might actually be a nice little moment we could, you know, light them. | 01:08:11 | |
| As well And it could be a nice Christmas element as well. And the motion we can call out medium columnar trees and then that gives | 01:08:16 | |
| you some latitude to work with and. | 01:08:20 | |
| Yeah. Are you tied to calm or would you also be open to like a? | 01:08:25 | |
| Flowering, small scale like decorative. | 01:08:31 | |
| Type tree. | 01:08:33 | |
| Accent type tree. | 01:08:35 | |
| Sure, that's right. So there's like a dog would or something alive. | 01:08:37 | |
| So rather than call them or just call out small to medium tree. | 01:08:43 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 01:08:47 | |
| We can do that in the motion, almost, almost artistic. | 01:08:49 | |
| Looking for, you know. | 01:08:54 | |
| Perfect. | 01:08:56 | |
| It suggests all right. Any other questions for the applicant? | 01:08:57 | |
| All right, we'll go ahead and have you guys sit down. | 01:09:01 | |
| And then this is a public hearing, so we'll go ahead and open up the public hearing on this. If there's anyone members from the | 01:09:03 | |
| public that want to speak on this tonight, I don't see anyone other than the applicant present. | 01:09:09 | |
| Unless we have the other applicants who are interested in. | 01:09:14 | |
| So with that, we'll go 123 and close the public hearing. And then Commissioners, any discussion points? | 01:09:17 | |
| That we want to touch on before a motion made on this one. | 01:09:24 | |
| I just think that the use is really reasonable in terms of intensity. | 01:09:28 | |
| And the the suggested modifications to the. | 01:09:33 | |
| Structure I think are. | 01:09:36 | |
| You know, in line with the. | 01:09:38 | |
| The historic look. | 01:09:39 | |
| And and feel of the property and I think I appreciate that the applicant is really being thoughtful about, not just. | 01:09:40 | |
| Replicating a look but preserving some of the actual elements? That's nice. Absolutely. | 01:09:47 | |
| And I'm glad it was designated historical. | 01:09:52 | |
| It's cool. | 01:09:55 | |
| We need more of that. | 01:09:56 | |
| So. But I do agree with you, Commissioner Font on the. | 01:09:57 | |
| You know, putting in a couple smaller trees. | 01:10:02 | |
| Definitely because. | 01:10:04 | |
| Again, if they didn't have the power line conflict, I'd be a bully about it, but. | 01:10:06 | |
| I don't see anything really. | 01:10:11 | |
| Being big. | 01:10:13 | |
| Viable with those power lines unless you just want to see what half a tree looks like growing up against a house. | 01:10:14 | |
| I agree. So with that I. | 01:10:21 | |
| I'm happy to entertain anyone that wants to make a motion. | 01:10:25 | |
| Or I'll make the motion. | 01:10:30 | |
| All right, I'll go for it. | 01:10:33 | |
| See if I can get this right. | 01:10:34 | |
| Because I got pages of stuff here, OK. | 01:10:36 | |
| So, umm. | 01:10:39 | |
| I motion the Holiday Planning Commission moved to approve. | 01:10:40 | |
| The application for a conditional use permit for a historic site modification. | 01:10:43 | |
| And for use as a jewelry shop for the David McDonald House. | 01:10:48 | |
| Designated as a historic site by Section 13.86, Point 02 of the City. | 01:10:52 | |
| Of holiday. | 01:10:59 | |
| Code located at 4659 S Highland Drive. | 01:11:00 | |
| Based upon the findings that the application. | 01:11:04 | |
| Meets the suggested findings within the packet. | 01:11:08 | |
| And additionally that. | 01:11:11 | |
| They retain and reuse the fence, as they've outlined in their presentation today. | 01:11:14 | |
| And that they also. | 01:11:20 | |
| Put in two. | 01:11:21 | |
| Small to medium trees that will work with the landscaping in front of the home. | 01:11:23 | |
| We probably ought to strike #4 and just have them comply with the ordinance. | 01:11:30 | |
| What's that? | 01:11:35 | |
| #4 on the. | 01:11:36 | |
| Conditions of approval. | 01:11:37 | |
| With the canal, strike that and just require him to. | 01:11:40 | |
| What do you call it? The water maintenance water. | 01:11:43 | |
| Preservation. | 01:11:46 | |
| OK. And then? | 01:11:48 | |
| OK, so opponent Commissioner Ken Hams amend that motion to also have the. | 01:11:50 | |
| Umm City compliant to the canal on the east side of the property. | 01:11:58 | |
| And or any additional parking be compliant with. | 01:12:03 | |
| City code standards. | 01:12:07 | |
| Commissioner Font second. | 01:12:10 | |
| All right, you have a second. We'll come down here. | 01:12:12 | |
| Commissioner Baron. | 01:12:14 | |
| Aye, Mr. Gong, I, Commissioner Prince, Aye, Commissioner full. | 01:12:15 | |
| Aye, Mr. Cunningham. Aye. And Chair Roche votes aye. | 01:12:18 | |
| So we look forward to see that progress. Thank you very much. | 01:12:22 | |
| All right. | 01:12:26 | |
| Can we request? | 01:12:28 | |
| We will now 3 minute for a quick three minute recess and be right back. | 01:12:30 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| Good afternoon and welcome to the Holiday city planning. | 00:00:00 | |
| Commission work session. | 00:00:04 | |
| It is 534 on September 2nd, 2025. We have all Commissioners in attendance except our newest 1 Commissioner. | 00:00:06 | |
| Tripany. | 00:00:15 | |
| Trypani is not with us. | 00:00:17 | |
| And we have council and city staff, Miss Marsh. So with that we have. | 00:00:19 | |
| 4 items on the agenda. | 00:00:26 | |
| Wait a minute. | 00:00:29 | |
| Five items on the agenda. | 00:00:31 | |
| But there's a recognition of service award for commissioner. | 00:00:33 | |
| Former Commissioner Bill Chinsky. | 00:00:36 | |
| I don't know what that is. Is she coming? Do we have something arranged? | 00:00:39 | |
| I've it will just be a. | 00:00:43 | |
| Recognition. | 00:00:46 | |
| All right, I didn't plan a speech or anything, so. | 00:00:48 | |
| I'll do the best I can and wing that. | 00:00:51 | |
| And then we have the public hearing for the McDonald. | 00:00:53 | |
| David McDonald, Historic Home and then three. | 00:00:57 | |
| Different things for Amare Vita. | 00:01:01 | |
| So with that. | 00:01:04 | |
| Tell us about the David MacDonald House. | 00:01:06 | |
| OK, really quick note to when I was looking at the. | 00:01:10 | |
| Staff report for. | 00:01:15 | |
| Items number 23. | 00:01:18 | |
| Forward realized that I didn't put the most current one in the packet. | 00:01:19 | |
| So. | 00:01:25 | |
| I'll have the current one up on the screen. | 00:01:26 | |
| And you all have a printed copy of the current one. | 00:01:29 | |
| The changes. | 00:01:32 | |
| Are on page. | 00:01:35 | |
| Three, there's some emissions. | 00:01:37 | |
| About variance. | 00:01:40 | |
| Page 6 emissions about a variance and page 7. | 00:01:42 | |
| So it's just taking out references to a variance. | 00:01:46 | |
| The new packet. That or staff report. | 00:01:50 | |
| UMM is discussing. | 00:01:54 | |
| Lot width and. | 00:01:57 | |
| A definition in our code. | 00:01:59 | |
| For exceptions to lot width. | 00:02:01 | |
| So we'll go over that once we get to that item, but that is. | 00:02:03 | |
| Kind of the change out and difference in the staff report. | 00:02:06 | |
| And I have the old. | 00:02:09 | |
| Up on the screen too, and then the. | 00:02:12 | |
| The new one too, so I'll show you specifically where those. | 00:02:14 | |
| Changes were made. | 00:02:18 | |
| OK. All right. | 00:02:20 | |
| So item number one, we'll start there. | 00:02:22 | |
| Or, umm. | 00:02:25 | |
| I guess it's actually #2 since we're skipping. | 00:02:25 | |
| My agenda has misnumbered. | 00:02:29 | |
| Items here because we've got Commissioner Bill Chinsky in there. | 00:02:31 | |
| And my screen is being. | 00:02:35 | |
| Very strange. | 00:02:37 | |
| OK, there we go. | 00:02:39 | |
| I think it's a chord. | 00:02:41 | |
| Way to go, you broke it. | 00:02:51 | |
| All right, how about you? | 00:02:59 | |
| Good, yeah. | 00:03:01 | |
| Missed you. | 00:03:03 | |
| I'm pretty sure we've gone off the rails entirely. | 00:03:07 | |
| I I. | 00:03:11 | |
| Tootsie rolls on my. | 00:03:24 | |
| Let me try reconnecting and see if that fixes it. | 00:03:27 | |
| There's no sign. | 00:03:33 | |
| In Africa Africa was in March. | 00:03:44 | |
| This most recent trip was just Hawaii. | 00:03:48 | |
| So I was I. | 00:03:51 | |
| Just Hawaii. | 00:03:54 | |
| Which island? | 00:04:01 | |
| Big. | 00:04:02 | |
| Of it I'm still to my. | 00:04:04 | |
| Aloha logo. | 00:04:08 | |
| At the Hawaiian 5 or Dime or whatever they call those tourist tours. | 00:04:10 | |
| Not this time. You did it. | 00:04:18 | |
| It's cool. | 00:04:23 | |
| Very cool. | 00:04:24 | |
| Are they like the Steve Irwin kind of manta rays? Like are there mortal pair? | 00:04:27 | |
| So. | 00:04:32 | |
| And they come around, you come watch them. | 00:04:35 | |
| How big are the Stingrays? | 00:04:39 | |
| What's the difference? | 00:04:46 | |
| I don't know. | 00:04:47 | |
| Just the little thing on the end of it that will kill you. | 00:04:48 | |
| Side. | 00:04:51 | |
| Oh, are they? | 00:04:53 | |
| You're attracted to the light. | 00:04:57 | |
| So you watch them at night? Did you do that? | 00:04:59 | |
| We did it. | 00:05:02 | |
| It's pretty cool. | 00:05:03 | |
| I've tried it and I just fall off her. | 00:05:09 | |
| Well. | 00:05:17 | |
| Sounds intense. | 00:05:19 | |
| It's been way too difficult. | 00:05:20 | |
| Good for you. Thanks a lot. | 00:05:24 | |
| If you know any good garage door guys let me know. I got 3 beds coming out this week. | 00:05:43 | |
| So you're working for well. | 00:05:49 | |
| It's old and beat up and. | 00:05:54 | |
| Monarch. | 00:05:58 | |
| Yeah. | 00:06:02 | |
| For surface repair or like. | 00:06:03 | |
| Probably both. | 00:06:06 | |
| There we go. | 00:06:07 | |
| Like Francesco Door or something? | 00:06:17 | |
| And we're back. | 00:06:19 | |
| I don't know why it struggles sometimes. | 00:06:22 | |
| All right, so let's go through. | 00:06:25 | |
| Our historical. | 00:06:28 | |
| Use and modifications item. This one is on. | 00:06:30 | |
| 4659 S Highland Drive. | 00:06:36 | |
| This is the David McDonald House who was just added to the city code as a historical property on Thursday at City Council. | 00:06:40 | |
| And the new property owner. | 00:06:48 | |
| Is looking to use that. | 00:06:51 | |
| Location as a. | 00:06:54 | |
| Custom jewelry shop. | 00:06:55 | |
| And. | 00:06:57 | |
| So making some modifications and then also the the use is what the conditional use. | 00:06:59 | |
| Wouldn't tell the key. | 00:07:04 | |
| Part of the staff report is director John Terry. | 00:07:07 | |
| Review and recommendation. | 00:07:12 | |
| He goes through each of the levels of review on historical. | 00:07:14 | |
| Uses and modifications. | 00:07:17 | |
| Pretty detailed on there. | 00:07:20 | |
| The one that you may have. | 00:07:25 | |
| Questions on is this tall freeze element? I was not sure what that was myself but it is the trim piece. | 00:07:27 | |
| That is. | 00:07:34 | |
| Underneath umm. | 00:07:35 | |
| The soffit. | 00:07:37 | |
| I'll point it out. | 00:07:43 | |
| Picture here. | 00:07:44 | |
| So this term piece here. | 00:07:49 | |
| Like an exterior crown molding. | 00:07:54 | |
| Yeah, exterior Chrome. | 00:07:56 | |
| That's a good way to put it. | 00:07:59 | |
| So you can see it in the recent ones, but then also in the. | 00:08:02 | |
| Historical photos as well. | 00:08:05 | |
| A little bit less intense. | 00:08:07 | |
| On the original. | 00:08:10 | |
| And then possible. | 00:08:12 | |
| Built up overtime. | 00:08:13 | |
| So. | 00:08:15 | |
| The three items that. | 00:08:17 | |
| That John noted in his review. | 00:08:23 | |
| Were the addition of the rear porch. | 00:08:26 | |
| This second level edition. | 00:08:30 | |
| That would be the sun room. | 00:08:32 | |
| Area that's up above the. | 00:08:34 | |
| Addition. | 00:08:36 | |
| And that the freeze. | 00:08:38 | |
| Frisee from the upper. | 00:08:39 | |
| And then the scale of the column supporting the front porch. | 00:08:42 | |
| You can discuss those items with the applicant. | 00:08:45 | |
| And. | 00:08:50 | |
| Did you say this? | 00:08:55 | |
| Was sorry you say this was. | 00:08:56 | |
| Approved, Uh. | 00:08:58 | |
| As a historical building. | 00:08:59 | |
| In the last meeting of City Council. | 00:09:01 | |
| Yes. | 00:09:04 | |
| So our. | 00:09:05 | |
| Our code for historical buildings. | 00:09:06 | |
| Our historical sites. | 00:09:10 | |
| There wasn't a way to designate new buildings to. | 00:09:13 | |
| Our site designation list. | 00:09:18 | |
| So that was one of the changes that was made in the code modifications for historical site preservation. | 00:09:20 | |
| What was it earlier this year? | 00:09:28 | |
| So, and that is one of the. | 00:09:30 | |
| Homes that. | 00:09:35 | |
| Designated in the general plan is called out. | 00:09:36 | |
| It's already been on the National. | 00:09:39 | |
| Historic Register. | 00:09:42 | |
| So it was. | 00:09:44 | |
| Supported for the designation. | 00:09:45 | |
| So now that it's added into the code. | 00:09:48 | |
| In the historical sites. | 00:09:50 | |
| Now it's eligible for. | 00:09:53 | |
| Conditional use. | 00:09:55 | |
| So kind of the process to get it designated first. | 00:09:57 | |
| So then it's eligible for. | 00:10:00 | |
| Use and modification. | 00:10:01 | |
| So to clarify, what conditional use does that historic designation that it just got? | 00:10:03 | |
| Permit under. | 00:10:09 | |
| What we're going through like. | 00:10:12 | |
| Could it have not have just been a jewelry store in an old building without it? | 00:10:14 | |
| Yes, because it is. | 00:10:18 | |
| Zoned as RM. | 00:10:20 | |
| This is the similar to the other historic property that we've done a conditional use on. | 00:10:22 | |
| It's typically easier to go through a. | 00:10:27 | |
| Designation and the historic. | 00:10:32 | |
| Modification Conditional use permit. | 00:10:36 | |
| Rather than rezoning it to. | 00:10:38 | |
| That was an option that the property owner had available. | 00:10:41 | |
| But encouraged by staff to go through the historic. | 00:10:45 | |
| Site Preservation. | 00:10:48 | |
| OK. Thank you for clarifying. | 00:10:49 | |
| So there are no flight on. | 00:10:52 | |
| Site modific. | 00:10:56 | |
| Is really just the exterior of the building. | 00:10:57 | |
| Second level edition. | 00:11:00 | |
| Porch, ADA ramp and then some landscaping modifications. | 00:11:02 | |
| A gated entrance. | 00:11:08 | |
| At the front. | 00:11:09 | |
| And I think there was a one tree removal. | 00:11:14 | |
| In the front, yes. Yes there are. | 00:11:16 | |
| There were two pine trees up in the front that were removed. | 00:11:20 | |
| So just some replacement of those. They can be either on site or off site, whatever the. | 00:11:24 | |
| The Commission would. | 00:11:29 | |
| Would like to. | 00:11:31 | |
| Choose with the applicant. | 00:11:33 | |
| So we have to call that out in the. | 00:11:37 | |
| As part of the. | 00:11:39 | |
| Application uh. | 00:11:41 | |
| It's anytime you have an application. | 00:11:42 | |
| If there's modifications or tree removals, it requires a tree replacement. | 00:11:44 | |
| The applicant may have plans to put trees in the front yard. | 00:11:52 | |
| Or they. | 00:11:56 | |
| They may like to have up to half of the. | 00:11:57 | |
| Replacement trays required located off site. | 00:12:00 | |
| So if they had two that were required, they could replace one off site. | 00:12:03 | |
| Any other questions around? | 00:12:14 | |
| OK, I think we're ready to roll into the. | 00:12:16 | |
| The 234 items. | 00:12:20 | |
| OK. Or I guess 345 depending on how you number? | 00:12:22 | |
| And this one should be familiar. | 00:12:29 | |
| Had it as discussion items in our last agenda. | 00:12:32 | |
| Or our last meeting. | 00:12:36 | |
| Let me get to that location. | 00:12:39 | |
| OK. | 00:12:58 | |
| So this is the packet with the old. | 00:13:00 | |
| Information in it. | 00:13:02 | |
| This is the part that. | 00:13:04 | |
| Talks about the variance. | 00:13:08 | |
| That is removed in the modified 1. | 00:13:10 | |
| And then these couple of points. | 00:13:14 | |
| And. | 00:13:17 | |
| The approval this one. | 00:13:21 | |
| So at this point. | 00:13:24 | |
| And. | 00:13:26 | |
| This one. | 00:13:29 | |
| So those are all removed. | 00:13:30 | |
| This is the. | 00:13:32 | |
| Updated. | 00:13:33 | |
| So we'll just jump over to that. | 00:13:34 | |
| OK. | 00:13:47 | |
| I think we're all pretty clear on the process for this. It will be 3 public hearings. | 00:13:49 | |
| Concepts of division first. | 00:13:55 | |
| And then second will be the. | 00:13:57 | |
| Planned unit development. | 00:13:59 | |
| Conditional use, that's where. | 00:14:00 | |
| Most of the content is. | 00:14:02 | |
| And then the final will be incorporating the PUD elements into the preliminary plat. | 00:14:04 | |
| Probably most helpful to go through some of the PUD elements. Are there questions on those from? | 00:14:11 | |
| The last meeting. | 00:14:18 | |
| And then possibly on the. | 00:14:20 | |
| Concept subdivision as well. | 00:14:22 | |
| So let's go to. Let's start with that concept subdivision. | 00:14:29 | |
| And the change that was made. | 00:14:33 | |
| It is in. | 00:14:38 | |
| Area and. | 00:14:44 | |
| Some standards. | 00:14:51 | |
| OK, so this is the note on lot width. | 00:14:56 | |
| So the lot width is reduced from 100 feet due to significant trees and streams and floodplains. | 00:14:59 | |
| This is the definition of lot width and 13.04 point 040. | 00:15:06 | |
| Lotwith is based off the. | 00:15:12 | |
| Diameter of the largest circle that can be inscribed entirely within a lot. | 00:15:14 | |
| The lot which circles should not include streams, floodplains, wetlands, areas of 30% slower, greater or other natural. | 00:15:19 | |
| Hazard areas. | 00:15:26 | |
| Or a significant tree. | 00:15:28 | |
| Significantly. | 00:15:31 | |
| So. | 00:15:33 | |
| There is. | 00:15:35 | |
| Concepts of division layout that shows is overlaid on. | 00:15:38 | |
| Their tree plan. | 00:15:44 | |
| So those two things were. | 00:15:46 | |
| Merged together. | 00:15:48 | |
| So with the significant trees on there and then the. | 00:15:55 | |
| Waterway. | 00:15:59 | |
| Where the basis of reducing the lot width from 100 feet. | 00:16:01 | |
| To I think there's a range of 89 to 92 1/2. | 00:16:05 | |
| Feet. They're still meeting the front. | 00:16:11 | |
| Or the lot frontage. | 00:16:14 | |
| The overall width. | 00:16:18 | |
| It seems like they need to take one lot out of there to make it kind of work a little better. | 00:16:25 | |
| Looks like everything is kind of just jammed in there and it. | 00:16:30 | |
| Doesn't really add to the. | 00:16:34 | |
| The organic nature of what you're trying to create. | 00:16:36 | |
| Right. And that's. | 00:16:40 | |
| Where it has enough land area. | 00:16:41 | |
| For each of the lots. | 00:16:44 | |
| All meeting the. | 00:16:47 | |
| One acre size. | 00:16:48 | |
| The natural features on there with the trees and the. | 00:16:50 | |
| And the waterway is then what is reducing those lot with standards? | 00:16:55 | |
| To 92 ish on average from. | 00:17:00 | |
| 100. | 00:17:05 | |
| But you can see that with the setbacks drawn on there. | 00:17:07 | |
| There isn't a practical building lot. | 00:17:10 | |
| That kind of. | 00:17:14 | |
| Defeats the. | 00:17:15 | |
| Point of dream. | 00:17:16 | |
| That they can do this but. | 00:17:20 | |
| So within the 92. | 00:17:23 | |
| As long as they build the building. | 00:17:26 | |
| Within that 92 circle with it, whatever it is, 510 foot set back on the side yard. | 00:17:28 | |
| Then they're still in compliance with. | 00:17:34 | |
| Oops, what's on there, right? | 00:17:37 | |
| Right with the LOT standards. | 00:17:38 | |
| I think the city has done a great job in trying to maintain the character here and I'd like to see. | 00:17:43 | |
| This subdivision kind of embraces. | 00:17:47 | |
| More of that idea rather than. | 00:17:50 | |
| Having a lot of different homes. | 00:17:52 | |
| That could be right next to each other. | 00:17:55 | |
| They would kind of look kind of odd. | 00:17:57 | |
| But I'll be quiet now. | 00:17:59 | |
| Yeah, I think that. | 00:18:04 | |
| Then that leads into. | 00:18:05 | |
| Some of the intent behind a PUD is so that you have more creative layout than what a standard. | 00:18:10 | |
| Subdivision. Uh. | 00:18:16 | |
| Would allow. | 00:18:17 | |
| So that you have some flexibility as to where. | 00:18:19 | |
| Structures can be placed, maybe some limitations on. | 00:18:24 | |
| Overall sizes. | 00:18:27 | |
| Related, I think to that. | 00:18:34 | |
| And there's some language about areas of coverage. | 00:18:36 | |
| And there's two different numbers. | 00:18:41 | |
| 23 or 28% and 22 or 27. | 00:18:44 | |
| And if I could understand my notes. | 00:18:48 | |
| That was because of the. | 00:18:51 | |
| Pool it was in in the original plan. | 00:18:52 | |
| And I thought I heard last time that they didn't mean to put the pool on the documents we had. | 00:18:55 | |
| I just want to make sure that if we make a motion. | 00:19:02 | |
| Apparently that language is in the motion somewhere. | 00:19:05 | |
| And I just want to make sure. | 00:19:08 | |
| Which of those areas of coverage we're really improving? | 00:19:11 | |
| Talking about on page 4. | 00:19:15 | |
| Yeah, so we have. | 00:19:18 | |
| This is what the LOT standard is. | 00:19:21 | |
| For lot coverage. | 00:19:23 | |
| 23% for structures. | 00:19:26 | |
| 28% total. | 00:19:28 | |
| In the R143 zone. | 00:19:30 | |
| 20% for structures, 33% total. | 00:19:32 | |
| Oh sorry, I reverse this. R143 first and then R187. | 00:19:36 | |
| For that second percent. | 00:19:40 | |
| We our code allows for a bonus coverage. | 00:19:43 | |
| So that would then increase. | 00:19:47 | |
| The total block coverage up. | 00:19:49 | |
| 10%. | 00:19:51 | |
| So those same standards could be applied, but. | 00:19:53 | |
| The. | 00:19:56 | |
| The Commission would have to decide on the rationale, because it is. | 00:19:58 | |
| Two different standards across two different zones. | 00:20:02 | |
| So. | 00:20:05 | |
| You could. | 00:20:06 | |
| Either, umm. | 00:20:07 | |
| Apply that lot coverage standard to each zone sort so each side of the tree can say this is the standard for this side and this is | 00:20:08 | |
| the standard for this side. | 00:20:12 | |
| Or you can. | 00:20:16 | |
| Create a project overall. | 00:20:17 | |
| Standard. | 00:20:20 | |
| Which is somewhere between the two. | 00:20:21 | |
| Do we have what that recommend is recommendation is in the staff report already there is a recommendation? | 00:20:27 | |
| Where the proposal? | 00:20:33 | |
| Is seeking to shift. | 00:20:37 | |
| One of the dwelling units to the east side of the Creek. | 00:20:39 | |
| It seemed a little bit less complicated. | 00:20:43 | |
| To just have a kind of middle line standard that applies across the whole project. | 00:20:46 | |
| And I think that the recommendation was. | 00:20:52 | |
| 22%. | 00:20:55 | |
| Since most of the land is and the R143 zone. | 00:21:00 | |
| And that's not approval of the PUD. | 00:21:04 | |
| Yeah, that would be one of the conditions of the beauty. | 00:21:09 | |
| That's where you can put a limitation. | 00:21:13 | |
| On that coverage. | 00:21:15 | |
| That he'll pencil out for you, Commissioner. | 00:21:25 | |
| Yeah. | 00:21:28 | |
| Yeah. So this is the. | 00:21:29 | |
| Yeah, this is the part I was talking about. | 00:21:33 | |
| Simplification. | 00:21:35 | |
| That a coverage maximum for the entire project at either 2328 for our 1:43. | 00:21:37 | |
| Or midpoint between the two. | 00:21:43 | |
| 60% of the project areas in the R143 zone. | 00:21:47 | |
| Coverage limit of 22. | 00:21:51 | |
| And 27 total. | 00:21:53 | |
| Is what is recommended, but that's also. | 00:21:55 | |
| Can't be discussed with the applicant. | 00:21:58 | |
| As it's a more. | 00:22:01 | |
| Arbitrary thing. There's more unknowns where they don't know what the size of their structures will be, but then they can take | 00:22:02 | |
| that as the project overall. | 00:22:06 | |
| And kind of subtract. | 00:22:10 | |
| Total coverage out of the project as they go along. | 00:22:13 | |
| So maybe by the time they get to the last house there may not be a lot of structure coverage left. | 00:22:18 | |
| Be a really skinny bunkhouse. | 00:22:26 | |
| Yeah, and that creates some of that limitation. | 00:22:28 | |
| To make sure that there's not just. | 00:22:31 | |
| Large structures that are. | 00:22:35 | |
| Covering the. | 00:22:37 | |
| The entire property, the percentage based coverage. | 00:22:37 | |
| Creates a natural limitation. | 00:22:41 | |
| All right, other questions around the. | 00:22:47 | |
| Concept or PUD elements? | 00:22:51 | |
| Do we have any questions on the preliminary plat? | 00:22:57 | |
| For. | 00:23:01 | |
| Oh, the other thing, Commissioner Roche, that we can talk about is this one or two acre parcel analysis. | 00:23:04 | |
| That is. | 00:23:10 | |
| Addition since the last meeting. | 00:23:12 | |
| Umm, this shows. | 00:23:14 | |
| What? | 00:23:18 | |
| How many parcels are two acres in each zone? | 00:23:19 | |
| And then how many? | 00:23:22 | |
| Parcels are. | 00:23:23 | |
| One acre. | 00:23:25 | |
| So the three. | 00:23:27 | |
| Parcels involved here are or sorry for. | 00:23:29 | |
| These ones here. | 00:23:33 | |
| Most of the parcels in the R143 zone are conforming or in some cases. | 00:23:35 | |
| Over conforming so they're larger than an acre. | 00:23:41 | |
| Up to 2 acres. | 00:23:46 | |
| There's a few. | 00:23:47 | |
| Parcels here in the R187 zone that are smaller. | 00:23:49 | |
| Than two acres. | 00:23:53 | |
| But if everything is approved on what they've. | 00:23:59 | |
| The applicants brought forward today, then that would. | 00:24:01 | |
| All those would be. | 00:24:07 | |
| Not highlighted because they'd all be less than an acre at that point, except for the one. | 00:24:10 | |
| In the R187. | 00:24:14 | |
| Is that right? | 00:24:16 | |
| Right. | 00:24:17 | |
| Which is also the nature of. | 00:24:20 | |
| Beauties where you're going to create property that. | 00:24:22 | |
| Is not going to be. | 00:24:26 | |
| Necessarily a full. | 00:24:27 | |
| Conformity with the zone. There's just enough land in that. | 00:24:29 | |
| Area for. | 00:24:32 | |
| To meet the requirements of the zone. | 00:24:34 | |
| Thank you for clarifying that. | 00:24:45 | |
| And that's why it's recorded on the plat as well as being a PUD. | 00:24:47 | |
| When pewdies are created, you have your overall project area. | 00:24:57 | |
| And then you have your set building areas that are recorded and then you can't expand outside of those. | 00:25:00 | |
| So those have been done since. | 00:25:06 | |
| Before holiday incorporated under Salt Lake County. | 00:25:09 | |
| There's several developments. | 00:25:12 | |
| That are pretty large scale developments that have. | 00:25:14 | |
| They resulted in lots that are smaller than the zone standard. | 00:25:18 | |
| But the trade off is then that there's open space that's common or. | 00:25:22 | |
| Shifted to other areas within the project instead of having each individual lot to meet the. | 00:25:26 | |
| Meet the lot size standard. | 00:25:32 | |
| Will any of the properties fall as low as the R121 standard though? | 00:25:36 | |
| With what's being proposed. | 00:25:41 | |
| No. | 00:25:43 | |
| The other question we had from the other. | 00:25:49 | |
| From the previous meeting. | 00:25:52 | |
| Was tree detail. | 00:25:54 | |
| And the applicant added some additional. | 00:25:56 | |
| Detail on their tree plan. | 00:26:00 | |
| That shows the. | 00:26:02 | |
| Canopy area that's being removed. | 00:26:05 | |
| So that's the cloud. | 00:26:09 | |
| Areas that you'll see in red. | 00:26:12 | |
| So the red diagonal hash lines are. | 00:26:15 | |
| Where there's roadway. | 00:26:19 | |
| Underneath the canopy as well. | 00:26:22 | |
| I think this is canopy that comes over. | 00:26:27 | |
| They you can go through that with the applicant. | 00:26:29 | |
| So the line. | 00:26:32 | |
| The red. | 00:26:33 | |
| Circles are canopy removal. Or that's just canopy existence. | 00:26:34 | |
| Let's see. | 00:26:40 | |
| So it's the. | 00:26:41 | |
| The hash. | 00:26:43 | |
| Cloud headlines and you can't tell that it's little zigzag. | 00:26:46 | |
| Around it. | 00:26:48 | |
| It is. So it's this existing tree canopy to be removed. | 00:26:49 | |
| Is. | 00:26:53 | |
| This area. | 00:26:55 | |
| OK. And then tree canopy tree? | 00:26:57 | |
| Is outside here, so there's identification of canopy. | 00:27:00 | |
| That's staying and then some canopy that's being removed. So you have some that's being removed here for Rd. | 00:27:04 | |
| You have can't tree canopy being removed here for a Rd. | 00:27:11 | |
| And then the actual trees associated with. | 00:27:15 | |
| Each of those. | 00:27:18 | |
| So on that. | 00:27:19 | |
| There's tree canopy to remain with a house built literally in the middle of that big red circle, right? | 00:27:21 | |
| On this one. | 00:27:29 | |
| One down. | 00:27:30 | |
| One down this one, yeah. | 00:27:31 | |
| Yeah, the. | 00:27:34 | |
| It doesn't have all of the tree canopy on that. They may be some smaller trees. | 00:27:40 | |
| Umm. | 00:27:46 | |
| But all of those details are. | 00:27:54 | |
| OK, things that I'm sure the applicant can. | 00:27:56 | |
| Go over in more detail with you. All right, Well, I just want to make sure I understand what I'm looking at on that, so thank you. | 00:27:59 | |
| I think that was all of the. | 00:28:08 | |
| Things that came up from the last meeting. | 00:28:10 | |
| With the question, with the pool that's taken off, that was just kind of a. | 00:28:14 | |
| Idea, but it's not. | 00:28:18 | |
| Not set as a. | 00:28:21 | |
| Determined thing in their plan. | 00:28:23 | |
| One of the lots that is referenced. | 00:28:26 | |
| Is. | 00:28:28 | |
| This lot. | 00:28:31 | |
| Where the front of that can go either way, so there's not a set back that's. | 00:28:32 | |
| Really portrayed on it. | 00:28:37 | |
| Just because there's flexibility there with where that house may end up. | 00:28:39 | |
| OK. And. | 00:28:44 | |
| So on setbacks too, I wanted to go over that as well. | 00:28:48 | |
| And we talked about this a little bit the last time. | 00:28:54 | |
| It's not this one. | 00:28:57 | |
| Utility. | 00:28:59 | |
| I think the pool is still on there, but it's not supposed to be there. | 00:29:08 | |
| We'll include that as removed. | 00:29:12 | |
| Or note that. | 00:29:15 | |
| To ignore the rendering of the pool on page 98. | 00:29:40 | |
| Yeah, there's. | 00:29:45 | |
| It's there on a couple of pages. | 00:29:46 | |
| Results here on this one too. | 00:29:48 | |
| It is conceptual in nature, not. | 00:29:53 | |
| A commitment. | 00:29:57 | |
| OK. | 00:30:02 | |
| Sorry, I'm trying to see where that. | 00:30:07 | |
| Where the setbacks are designated on what sheet? | 00:30:09 | |
| I think it's on this one. | 00:30:15 | |
| No, it's not. | 00:30:21 | |
| So is that anything that needs to be called out in the motion or is that just? | 00:30:23 | |
| Copy paste from the lack lost packet and not. | 00:30:27 | |
| Applicable. | 00:30:30 | |
| I thought that I put the updated. | 00:30:32 | |
| Plans with the applicant provided in the packet. | 00:30:36 | |
| I'll double check that and we can pull them. | 00:30:40 | |
| If needed. | 00:30:43 | |
| OK. | 00:30:54 | |
| So on setbacks, this is where you'll see the narrow set back on this side. | 00:30:59 | |
| And then it increases to 20 feet. | 00:31:03 | |
| Over here. | 00:31:06 | |
| So for the first. | 00:31:07 | |
| 89 feet. | 00:31:12 | |
| Roughly. | 00:31:14 | |
| You'll have a 20 foot set back on that side. | 00:31:15 | |
| And then there's an additional 10 foot set back. | 00:31:18 | |
| We were talking about some of these utility easements the last time. | 00:31:21 | |
| So it's good to point out. | 00:31:24 | |
| Where those utility easements are that there wouldn't be structures within the utility easements. | 00:31:26 | |
| So while this just has a 20 foot set back. | 00:31:31 | |
| With the additional utility easement that has 30 feet. | 00:31:34 | |
| That's detailed in the staff report. It's a little bit closer here and then flares out further. | 00:31:40 | |
| Depending on where that structure. | 00:31:47 | |
| Ends up. | 00:31:49 | |
| This one has a 20 foot set back built in on either side of the road. | 00:31:51 | |
| So this structure could be. | 00:31:57 | |
| Up here more, or it could be down here further. There's not really a front step back on lot #8. | 00:32:00 | |
| 20 foot step back on. | 00:32:07 | |
| The uh. | 00:32:09 | |
| Side umm. | 00:32:10 | |
| That's Holiday Blvd. | 00:32:11 | |
| And then 20 foot set back on this side. | 00:32:13 | |
| And then each of the. | 00:32:16 | |
| Lots have a 5 foot utility easement. | 00:32:18 | |
| Between each of them. | 00:32:23 | |
| And. | 00:32:25 | |
| The utility easement along with a Rd. | 00:32:27 | |
| I think there was a question of the property line along there, so the property is owned to. | 00:32:31 | |
| A to a specific. | 00:32:36 | |
| Line to the middle of the road. | 00:32:39 | |
| The utility easement is set within the road. | 00:32:41 | |
| And. | 00:32:45 | |
| Than the building area is identified as the area that's outside of the road. | 00:32:47 | |
| So the minimum separation between buildings is 10 feet, correct? Because that's where the PU. | 00:32:53 | |
| Mm-hmm. Yes. | 00:32:59 | |
| And then all structures are 100 foot set back from the stream. | 00:33:02 | |
| Yes, or Creek. | 00:33:06 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:33:09 | |
| Without. | 00:33:10 | |
| If this was a standard subdivision or. | 00:33:12 | |
| Standard lot. | 00:33:15 | |
| This would have just a 50 foot set back from the Creek. | 00:33:16 | |
| On this side, because this is a previously developed lot. | 00:33:20 | |
| And then seeing what this parcel. | 00:33:24 | |
| Is that it would have a 50 foot set back. | 00:33:26 | |
| So they're increasing that step back to the full 100 feet. | 00:33:28 | |
| Where it would only have been 50 feet otherwise. | 00:33:32 | |
| If someone were to. | 00:33:35 | |
| Remove the house as is on that parcel. | 00:33:37 | |
| They could build up to 50 feet from the Creek. | 00:33:40 | |
| So, umm. | 00:33:43 | |
| That's where that extra. | 00:33:44 | |
| Area that they are not required to have in there they could. | 00:33:46 | |
| Jog in that protection area. | 00:33:50 | |
| 50 feet for each of those parcels, but they just. | 00:33:52 | |
| Included it as 100 feet. | 00:33:55 | |
| So additional. | 00:33:57 | |
| 50 feet across both of those parcels. | 00:33:58 | |
| And that's what's. | 00:34:01 | |
| Called out in the. | 00:34:02 | |
| PUD, yes. | 00:34:05 | |
| Application. | 00:34:07 | |
| All right. Any other questions because I know we're overdue to get our meeting started. Just one question, when were the adjacent | 00:34:10 | |
| property? | 00:34:13 | |
| Owners noticed. | 00:34:16 | |
| They were noticed. | 00:34:19 | |
| We sent out an initial notice before we did the. | 00:34:21 | |
| The zone map boundary. | 00:34:25 | |
| So they had a notice in. | 00:34:27 | |
| July. | 00:34:29 | |
| So the end of July. | 00:34:30 | |
| Than we did the. | 00:34:32 | |
| Hearing the 12th of. | 00:34:36 | |
| August. | 00:34:40 | |
| So they were noticed for that. | 00:34:40 | |
| And then we sent out a notice for the first meeting. | 00:34:43 | |
| And then sent out a meeting a notice for this second meeting. | 00:34:47 | |
| So they have had. | 00:34:50 | |
| 3 notices for the same project and there was number response. | 00:34:52 | |
| Yep, no comments. | 00:34:57 | |
| Thank you. | 00:34:58 | |
| Alrighty, well with that, unless there's any other questions about this, we'll get the work session closed. Anyone need a quick? | 00:35:00 | |
| Break before we roll into the official meeting. | 00:35:08 | |
| Everybody good. | 00:35:10 | |
| OK, so with that, you let me know. We were good to go, Kerry. | 00:35:11 | |
| Yeah, we are good to go. | 00:35:17 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. | 00:35:19 | |
| So good evening and welcome to the Holiday City Planning Commission. It is 6:10. Thanks for your patience if you've been waiting | 00:35:20 | |
| on us. | 00:35:24 | |
| Um, we have. | 00:35:27 | |
| All but the newest member of commissioners in attendance city staff. | 00:35:30 | |
| And council. | 00:35:35 | |
| And we have. | 00:35:36 | |
| Five items on the agenda. | 00:35:38 | |
| Four of them public hearings. | 00:35:40 | |
| And before we get going and working through all of those, I have asked Vice Chair Prince if she would read the opening statement | 00:35:42 | |
| for any members of the public. | 00:35:46 | |
| The City of Holiday Planning Commission is a volunteer citizen board whose function is to review land use plans and other special | 00:35:51 | |
| studies. | 00:35:55 | |
| Make recommendations to the City Council on proposed zoning map and ordinance changes. | 00:35:59 | |
| And approve conditional uses in subdivisions. | 00:36:04 | |
| The Planning Commission does not initiate land use applications. | 00:36:08 | |
| Rather, acts on applications as they are submitted. | 00:36:11 | |
| Commissioners do not meet with applicants except at publicly noticed meetings. | 00:36:15 | |
| Commissioners attempt to visit each property on the agenda where the location. | 00:36:19 | |
| The nature of the neighborhood. Existing structures. | 00:36:24 | |
| And uses related to the proposed change are noted. | 00:36:27 | |
| Decisions are based on observations, recommendations from the professional planning staff. | 00:36:31 | |
| The city's general plan, zoning ordinance and other reports. | 00:36:36 | |
| By all verbal and written comments and by evidence submitted. | 00:36:40 | |
| All of which are part of the public record. | 00:36:44 | |
| Thank you very much. | 00:36:47 | |
| All right. And with that, the first item we have on our agenda tonight is an acknowledgment of service. | 00:36:49 | |
| For former Commissioner Gingerville Chinsky. | 00:36:55 | |
| Commission just wants to recognize the time that she served as a planning commissioner and thank her for. | 00:37:00 | |
| Her efforts and all the time she's given to the community. | 00:37:06 | |
| And helping helping. | 00:37:10 | |
| Make holiday a great place to live. | 00:37:12 | |
| So. | 00:37:14 | |
| Ginger if you're watching. | 00:37:19 | |
| All right. And then we have our first public hearing item on here, which is the David McDonald Historic Home. | 00:37:21 | |
| And Miss Marsh, I'm not going to call you up to the podium because you got all your stuff set up there, but if you want to give us | 00:37:30 | |
| just a quick rundown on this. | 00:37:34 | |
| Absolutely. | 00:37:38 | |
| All right. | 00:37:42 | |
| This is our newest. | 00:37:43 | |
| Historic house or site designation? It was just designated through the City Council on Thursday. | 00:37:46 | |
| Last week. | 00:37:52 | |
| This property is known as the David McDonald House. It's located at 4659 S Highland Drive. | 00:37:53 | |
| Has been used as offices and. | 00:38:01 | |
| Umm residential treatment facility for some time. | 00:38:04 | |
| And is now going through the process to be designated as a historic property and make some modifications to. | 00:38:08 | |
| For new use. | 00:38:15 | |
| And some improvements to the to the property. | 00:38:17 | |
| The first couple of pages review what is in. | 00:38:23 | |
| The historic code. | 00:38:27 | |
| For the city. | 00:38:29 | |
| A review of uses as to what uses would be. | 00:38:32 | |
| Conditional within the. | 00:38:36 | |
| In a historic. | 00:38:38 | |
| Site other uses of similar intensity to the above. | 00:38:39 | |
| It is being proposed for use as a jewelry store. | 00:38:44 | |
| Doing custom jewelry, very low scale. | 00:38:48 | |
| Very similar to an antique shop or art shop. | 00:38:51 | |
| The site does have limited parking. | 00:38:55 | |
| The property owners seeking to improve some of the parking there both with. | 00:38:58 | |
| Refinishing the parking lot and adding some additional parking spots to. | 00:39:02 | |
| Meet the requirements for. | 00:39:06 | |
| Their use. | 00:39:08 | |
| The staff report goes through some of the. | 00:39:11 | |
| Historic details of the property. | 00:39:14 | |
| Was built in 1890. | 00:39:16 | |
| By David and Arabella McDonald. | 00:39:18 | |
| They immigrated to Utah from Scotland in 1869. | 00:39:20 | |
| David was with Blacksmith and his black ship. | 00:39:25 | |
| Smith's shop was located. | 00:39:28 | |
| Close to the property. | 00:39:30 | |
| Family has owned. | 00:39:33 | |
| The house. For quite some time they lived there. | 00:39:35 | |
| Or David and Arabelle lived there until 1912. | 00:39:39 | |
| And, umm. | 00:39:41 | |
| My understanding is that family members continue to own the house. | 00:39:43 | |
| Through umm. | 00:39:46 | |
| I believe that. | 00:39:48 | |
| Nineties 2000s of. | 00:39:49 | |
| Applicant can. | 00:39:52 | |
| Summarize some of that for you too. | 00:39:53 | |
| There's you can see the original. | 00:39:56 | |
| Picture of the house. | 00:39:59 | |
| And some modifications that were made in 1912 with adding a porch. | 00:40:00 | |
| The on the rear side of the property. | 00:40:06 | |
| Currently there is a. | 00:40:10 | |
| Rear porch. | 00:40:14 | |
| Likely in the. | 00:40:17 | |
| 60s, maybe earlier. | 00:40:19 | |
| It could have been earlier. | 00:40:22 | |
| There's not really a known date on when a rare addition was made. | 00:40:23 | |
| But it was definitely present in 1977. | 00:40:27 | |
| So the applicant is proposing some changes to that as there's some structural issues. | 00:40:32 | |
| This rear. | 00:40:37 | |
| And closure. | 00:40:39 | |
| So they're proposing to. | 00:40:40 | |
| Remove that and modify it to address the structural issues and add a second level as a sunroom. | 00:40:43 | |
| Other modifications. | 00:40:51 | |
| Are to the front of the house. | 00:40:53 | |
| With adding some Ada access. | 00:40:56 | |
| And a porch so they'll have ADA access off to this front side. | 00:41:01 | |
| Porch to cover that. | 00:41:06 | |
| Access around. | 00:41:08 | |
| Similar to the Porsche that was added on in 1912. | 00:41:10 | |
| The windows will all be changed out for security and also energy efficiency reasons there. | 00:41:16 | |
| Adding these paned windows styles. | 00:41:23 | |
| The frame of the window is not changing at all, so we'll still have the upper. | 00:41:26 | |
| Area. That's a solid. | 00:41:31 | |
| Surface. There are stained glass windows here and here, and I believe those are. | 00:41:34 | |
| Both stay, but you can clarify that with the applicant since they're not shown in this architectural drawing. | 00:41:40 | |
| Some modifications, just generally to landscaping. | 00:41:47 | |
| There were two large pine trees in the front. | 00:41:50 | |
| Of the property. | 00:41:53 | |
| There's power lines there, so replacing those with tall trees might be difficult, but. | 00:41:54 | |
| The applicant may be open to replacing with some smaller trees in the front yard. | 00:42:00 | |
| I'm trying to think what else we had in here. | 00:42:05 | |
| Oh, the other notable piece is that. | 00:42:09 | |
| There has historically been this Trump piece below. | 00:42:13 | |
| Below the roofline. | 00:42:20 | |
| You can discuss with the applicant about. | 00:42:22 | |
| Openness to modify to including that in. | 00:42:25 | |
| In their modifications. | 00:42:29 | |
| The other. | 00:42:31 | |
| Review or the other item noted. | 00:42:33 | |
| By the director was. | 00:42:37 | |
| That was a second level edition with the. | 00:42:42 | |
| Sun Sun porch. | 00:42:45 | |
| Freeze from the upper cornice. | 00:42:47 | |
| And then the scale of the columns supporting the front porch, so we can go back to that. | 00:42:49 | |
| Architectural Drawing. | 00:42:55 | |
| And take a look at the rear. | 00:42:58 | |
| The other note in the historic registry. | 00:43:01 | |
| The fence that's on the site was. | 00:43:05 | |
| Originally constructed I believe in 1912. You could see in that photo. | 00:43:07 | |
| A suggestion to possibly include that on the site somewhere. | 00:43:13 | |
| If it's not going to be used in the front of the site to incorporate it since it is noted on the historic registers being. | 00:43:18 | |
| Originally, umm. | 00:43:25 | |
| Created for the house. | 00:43:27 | |
| This is the elevation of the rear. | 00:43:31 | |
| Side so we can see. | 00:43:34 | |
| That rear addition? | 00:43:36 | |
| Being updated. | 00:43:39 | |
| More structurally, sound will actually have a foundation instead of just being poured on. | 00:43:40 | |
| S Lab on grade. | 00:43:45 | |
| And then the sun porch about the front. | 00:43:46 | |
| Or above. | 00:43:48 | |
| You can still see some of the windows through that. | 00:43:50 | |
| Glass that retains the look of. | 00:43:53 | |
| Some of the brick. | 00:43:54 | |
| Any questions from the Commission on? | 00:43:56 | |
| Items in the staff report. | 00:44:00 | |
| Just a. | 00:44:04 | |
| Clarifying, maybe this is a question better for the applicant, but. | 00:44:05 | |
| In the register. | 00:44:08 | |
| In the renderings, it does look like there is a. | 00:44:09 | |
| An iron fence, is it not? | 00:44:12 | |
| The same fence that's. | 00:44:14 | |
| They're currently. | 00:44:16 | |
| On this one. | 00:44:17 | |
| It might just be a rendering. It might be the same fence that. | 00:44:19 | |
| You can have that. | 00:44:22 | |
| And there is. | 00:44:24 | |
| A list of suggested findings from the TRC. | 00:44:26 | |
| Are those? | 00:44:31 | |
| All things that need to be covered with the applicant or are those already worked out in the attached? | 00:44:32 | |
| August 28. | 00:44:39 | |
| Addendum with. | 00:44:43 | |
| John Tierlink. | 00:44:45 | |
| Most of those. | 00:44:48 | |
| Findings are taken from the. | 00:44:49 | |
| Applicants narrative or letter of intent. | 00:44:52 | |
| And then with some of the details that were provided from the contractor as to the scope of the work. | 00:44:55 | |
| Umm, it is. | 00:45:01 | |
| If there's any modifications to those findings. | 00:45:04 | |
| You could go through each of those with the applicant and just make sure that they're. | 00:45:08 | |
| In agreeance with each of those or any of those need to be modified. | 00:45:11 | |
| OK. | 00:45:17 | |
| So that's the applicant property summary. I'm talking about the suggested findings under the technical review committee those, | 00:45:19 | |
| yes. | 00:45:22 | |
| I don't want to spend all night going back and forth looking at each one. I'm just curious, is there anything that's listed in | 00:45:28 | |
| here that's not? | 00:45:31 | |
| In the summarized narrative on this last page. | 00:45:36 | |
| That we need to. The other thing would just be trees. | 00:45:39 | |
| If you want to include that as a condition. | 00:45:42 | |
| The trees. | 00:45:44 | |
| OK. And as far as the? | 00:45:46 | |
| And then the. | 00:45:51 | |
| What is it called? The Freesia? | 00:45:53 | |
| Oh, the fruity frizzy is the right pronunciation. | 00:45:54 | |
| I am not an architect. | 00:45:58 | |
| I don't know. I'm not revenge. | 00:46:00 | |
| All right. Any other questions for city staff on this? | 00:46:05 | |
| Do we want to invite the applicant up to give additional? | 00:46:09 | |
| Q&A for us. | 00:46:12 | |
| Hopefully more a. | 00:46:16 | |
| How are we? | 00:46:17 | |
| If I answer your first question, my name is John Brooks Branscomb. I'm the owner of J Brooks Jewelers. | 00:46:21 | |
| Sorry, Mr. Branscomb, will you hit that power button on the top edge of that? | 00:46:26 | |
| Right there. | 00:46:30 | |
| Thank you. | 00:46:32 | |
| I don't know if I hit it right or not. Here we go, Kerry. | 00:46:33 | |
| I see it now. | 00:46:35 | |
| Can you hear me better now? | 00:46:35 | |
| OK, my name is John Brooks Transcom, the owner of Jay Brooks Jewelers and. | 00:46:37 | |
| We've been looking at this building for about a year. | 00:46:41 | |
| And finally decided to buy it. To answer your first question, if I tried to remove that fence in the front, my wife would divorce | 00:46:44 | |
| me. | 00:46:47 | |
| So that will definitely be part of. | 00:46:51 | |
| All of it because of the way the architect wants to build a little entrance there. They'll probably have some room on each side | 00:46:53 | |
| that will take the extra extension of that. | 00:46:56 | |
| Have to be removed, repaired, patched and then reinstalled. | 00:47:00 | |
| But when we're finished, our intention is to. | 00:47:04 | |
| Use that exactly the way it is, and then to mimic that up on the porch when we add the other. | 00:47:07 | |
| Pieces. | 00:47:14 | |
| We thought adding the porch made the most sense because there have been a porch for so many years. | 00:47:15 | |
| And then for the continuity and especially for the. | 00:47:19 | |
| Ada ramp. It made sense to. | 00:47:22 | |
| Cover it. | 00:47:25 | |
| So if somebody doesn't walk outside. | 00:47:26 | |
| And our weather and. | 00:47:28 | |
| That would be a bad thing, so. | 00:47:29 | |
| So that's the thing we want to do because the trees were so big and the ground. | 00:47:32 | |
| To our knowledge, has not been watered in five years. | 00:47:36 | |
| They were dead. | 00:47:39 | |
| And as much as I love trees, I'm from North Carolina. | 00:47:40 | |
| There's just no way to save them and make it look right. | 00:47:44 | |
| But the architect assures me that if we need to plant more trees that we can incorporate trees easily into the plan. | 00:47:46 | |
| Would they be big? | 00:47:53 | |
| No, you know. | 00:47:54 | |
| But I think that we will. | 00:47:56 | |
| You know, build some. We haven't done the architectural plan for the landscaping yet, correct? | 00:47:58 | |
| But. | 00:48:02 | |
| We're very open to making sure everybody. | 00:48:04 | |
| You know, loves what we do as far as that goes. | 00:48:06 | |
| On that subject, on the back because of parking. | 00:48:09 | |
| There's an old abandoned. | 00:48:12 | |
| In the back there there's an old abandoned. | 00:48:15 | |
| Canal that hasn't had water in it for 30 years. It's blocked on the bank side. | 00:48:18 | |
| And then under the on the holiday condominium side, it goes under the driveway but has no water in it and. | 00:48:24 | |
| The 90 year old great granddaughter came in there and told us it used to be a pond with Swans. | 00:48:30 | |
| That, that's a Galaxy gone by. | 00:48:35 | |
| So we have the surveyor been out this last week. | 00:48:38 | |
| Include where the property line really is. | 00:48:42 | |
| Because there's two fences with the canal in between. | 00:48:45 | |
| And so once we get that up if the. | 00:48:49 | |
| And the holiday and the condominiums behind us, they're willing to sell whatever we need. | 00:48:52 | |
| To build some additional diagonal parking. | 00:48:56 | |
| Behind the building. | 00:48:58 | |
| Without really changing from the front, you would notice it at all, and there's. | 00:49:00 | |
| A lot more room over in the corner next to the bank than you might realize where we can hide A. | 00:49:03 | |
| Dumpster and things like that without him being really seen. | 00:49:10 | |
| So there's a. | 00:49:13 | |
| There's a lot more room when you get into this corner than you might think, and again with the condominiums there. | 00:49:14 | |
| Happy to anything they don't have to take care of. | 00:49:19 | |
| They're happy to sell and get rid of off of their plate. | 00:49:22 | |
| So we're just waiting for the. | 00:49:25 | |
| Surveyor to come through and to do that. | 00:49:27 | |
| In the end, we're. | 00:49:30 | |
| We're all about life celebrations as a business. | 00:49:32 | |
| And creating. | 00:49:35 | |
| Lifetime memories. So the last thing we want to do. | 00:49:36 | |
| Is change the look of this home so much that you wouldn't recognize it? | 00:49:39 | |
| The McDonald children grant great grandchildren who were 80. | 00:49:43 | |
| 88 and 90 came by the store over the last 3-4 weeks. We've met them all. | 00:49:47 | |
| And they're so excited. | 00:49:52 | |
| In fact, one of the great granddaughters painted this picture that's up on the screen. | 00:49:54 | |
| And she said that there's. | 00:49:58 | |
| He said they're so excited that the house is going to be used and returned to its former. | 00:50:00 | |
| For lack of a better term, glory. | 00:50:04 | |
| The way that it looks. | 00:50:06 | |
| The. | 00:50:08 | |
| The the back porch just by way of information according to the. | 00:50:10 | |
| In 1941, when he was born, he said that back porch has been there as an open porch his entire life. | 00:50:15 | |
| And he has no memory of it not being there. | 00:50:21 | |
| And nor did his two great his sisters, who are 90 and 8889. They said that's been there forever. | 00:50:24 | |
| And that before it was open. | 00:50:30 | |
| And that's where she hit all the treats. | 00:50:31 | |
| So they would sit on the back porch. | 00:50:33 | |
| Unfortunately. | 00:50:36 | |
| We want to add. | 00:50:38 | |
| Because the room is limited, we want to add a vault. | 00:50:39 | |
| In that and those vaults weigh. | 00:50:42 | |
| You know, 8 to 10,000 lbs. | 00:50:44 | |
| And so the foundation, as Kerry explained so well, is just not, doesn't tolerate it. | 00:50:47 | |
| So the only way to fix it is to tear it off. | 00:50:52 | |
| And rebuild it. | 00:50:55 | |
| And while we're turning it off and rebuild it, it made sense. | 00:50:56 | |
| To build this little porch. | 00:50:59 | |
| For lots of different usages and social events and promotions that we would plan to do. | 00:51:02 | |
| Over the time. | 00:51:08 | |
| As far as impact, we're a low impact user, nothing like the coffee shop a block to our South. | 00:51:09 | |
| Which is probably having 3 or 405 hundred cars a day. | 00:51:14 | |
| We're probably a 15 to 20 car a day kind of business. | 00:51:18 | |
| And we do intend to keep the drive up window for as a. | 00:51:24 | |
| Trying to work it into our and our model of business which is different as a pickup window. | 00:51:28 | |
| So when people have three kids in the car and don't want to get or it's bad weather or whatever the scenario might be. | 00:51:32 | |
| So we would probably leave that alone. That's kind of our plan. | 00:51:38 | |
| Is the only one like it in the state, and that would be kind of. | 00:51:42 | |
| Fun so. | 00:51:44 | |
| In a nutshell, that connects. | 00:51:46 | |
| Is the. | 00:51:48 | |
| We had the driveway. | 00:51:50 | |
| We have the foundation examined as you know, the foundation. | 00:51:52 | |
| Made it through an earthquake. | 00:51:56 | |
| Didn't have any issues. | 00:51:58 | |
| And. | 00:52:00 | |
| With the exception of a small retaining wall. | 00:52:01 | |
| The previous owner. | 00:52:04 | |
| Swears that the inside has looked like that his entire 31 years he owned the building. | 00:52:07 | |
| And. | 00:52:13 | |
| And that the. | 00:52:14 | |
| The paving company promises that they won't be bringing in any 10 ton bulldozers to do anything that we have to worry about. | 00:52:16 | |
| Those kind of things. | 00:52:25 | |
| And so they're standing by. We have removed. | 00:52:26 | |
| A number of trees forward, completely dead. | 00:52:29 | |
| Getting ready to fall in the house. | 00:52:32 | |
| The rest of them we just removed all the four. | 00:52:33 | |
| And we clean it up. So if you have a chance, do you want to drive through? There is a dumpster back there, so don't go speeding on | 00:52:36 | |
| a big circle. | 00:52:39 | |
| But it is we started the process of cleaning it up and. | 00:52:42 | |
| And just getting ready. We didn't really want to do too much until you said. | 00:52:46 | |
| You can have a conditional use permit. | 00:52:50 | |
| And use this space. | 00:52:52 | |
| And so we want to. | 00:52:54 | |
| We want to be good neighbors. We I live in Mill Creek just. | 00:52:55 | |
| Three blocks to the due West of exactly where the building is. | 00:52:59 | |
| We want to. | 00:53:03 | |
| Return it to it, the beauty. | 00:53:04 | |
| House has been empty for five years, the. | 00:53:06 | |
| Took 25 people to clean up the lot but it was just a mess. | 00:53:09 | |
| And so I think when we're finished, I think it will be just as beautiful as the renditions. | 00:53:13 | |
| Do. Our architect and designer are both amazing and. | 00:53:17 | |
| And I think. | 00:53:21 | |
| The building that's down on Highland a little further, the brand new building is down between 33rd, 39th and 33rd with the. | 00:53:23 | |
| All the brick and all the beautiful landscaping with the. | 00:53:31 | |
| The white blue, that's kind of the look where we're going to go is kind of a Southern. | 00:53:34 | |
| Flavor just a little bit. | 00:53:37 | |
| And I think when we're finished, it would be beautiful. | 00:53:40 | |
| That's a quick summary. I think of everything that. | 00:53:44 | |
| I heard but I'm happy to answer any question and the architect is here. | 00:53:46 | |
| Who's happy to answer any technical question. | 00:53:50 | |
| So you're amenable to having a couple. | 00:53:52 | |
| Calling their trees up. | 00:53:55 | |
| In that front that I'm sure you. | 00:53:57 | |
| I'm sure that there would be something that would be skinny and linear. | 00:53:59 | |
| So Cory, do you have any spouse on that? | 00:54:08 | |
| I would be I would caution against the. | 00:54:13 | |
| What we'd be looking for? | 00:54:17 | |
| Is the design concept for that area is a very automatic here? | 00:54:19 | |
| European style garden. | 00:54:24 | |
| Brick walkways. | 00:54:29 | |
| Gardens. | 00:54:30 | |
| I pretty much get too much of A tree that actually block or. | 00:54:32 | |
| Take out too much of that. | 00:54:37 | |
| We haven't gotten. | 00:54:40 | |
| Project as well. | 00:54:50 | |
| Place that if you're not. | 00:54:51 | |
| Speedrite bias so. | 00:54:54 | |
| But we are mentioned. Why? | 00:54:57 | |
| Create a landscape plan that is very upscale and celebratory to. | 00:55:06 | |
| Makes sense? | 00:55:12 | |
| Just ask because you know, we're Tree City and I'm sure on the way. | 00:55:14 | |
| Evening or western afternoon sun in the summer. You know, it's nice to have some shade on that building, but. | 00:55:18 | |
| Understandable. | 00:55:25 | |
| You know, with the limitations of the landscape. | 00:55:26 | |
| Umm, as I'm looking at the suggested conditions of approval that are under the TRC, sounds like retention of the fence is planned | 00:55:30 | |
| and you're good with that one. | 00:55:34 | |
| It's listed as no improvements within 20 feet of the canal on the east side of the property. | 00:55:40 | |
| So it sounds like you're kind of. | 00:55:45 | |
| Loose on what's going to happen with that or. | 00:55:48 | |
| Well. | 00:55:50 | |
| I did not read that. | 00:55:54 | |
| So we want to. | 00:55:56 | |
| What we want to do to make it work? | 00:55:57 | |
| Have enough retail parking? | 00:55:59 | |
| Is we want to pay from the back of the house, from the building all the way to the fence line? | 00:56:00 | |
| Where the condominiums? | 00:56:06 | |
| Densly. Currently. | 00:56:08 | |
| And that allows us to the room. | 00:56:09 | |
| To be able to park additional cars so we have enough. | 00:56:11 | |
| Parking stalls relative to the amount of space we have, which is about 2500 feet. | 00:56:15 | |
| And so if we don't. | 00:56:20 | |
| We have to be if we don't pave over that canal which is talking to. | 00:56:21 | |
| One of our friends who's a former water. | 00:56:26 | |
| Specialist has talked to. | 00:56:29 | |
| Everybody who's involved in that and no one thinks that canal is an active canal in any form or fashion. | 00:56:31 | |
| And so the only question was who owns it? | 00:56:36 | |
| And so whether is it us or is it the? | 00:56:39 | |
| Condominium County. So one of the one of the things that would be essential is for us to be able to pave. | 00:56:42 | |
| Back to that, because right now all they've used for for the last 30 years is to dump. | 00:56:47 | |
| And we we've the clippings of every tree for 30 years is in that. | 00:56:52 | |
| Things that we've taken out. | 00:56:57 | |
| And that the space is much bigger than we thought. | 00:56:59 | |
| So if the surveyors come back, then it works easily enough and the. | 00:57:02 | |
| Baby Company's already been there, Kilgore Company and said no problem to do it, no problem to change anything. No trees need to | 00:57:06 | |
| be removed, which is good. | 00:57:10 | |
| Just a little trimming, which most of that's done. | 00:57:15 | |
| So how far is the? | 00:57:17 | |
| Canal from the building. | 00:57:19 | |
| Your I would say 10. | 00:57:21 | |
| Yeah. | 00:57:27 | |
| Probably 24 feet. | 00:57:30 | |
| From the back kitchen. | 00:57:31 | |
| That's why we had the property surveyed this. | 00:57:42 | |
| So we could try and reconcile to have. | 00:57:45 | |
| As we do understand. | 00:57:48 | |
| There are two fences there, just don't know which ones which. | 00:57:49 | |
| And how long the expenses have also been there? | 00:57:52 | |
| Purposes to it is. | 00:57:56 | |
| So we have. We're trying to do that. | 00:58:02 | |
| So, Carrie, have you looked at the? | 00:58:07 | |
| How they're gonna park here? | 00:58:08 | |
| So parking. | 00:58:11 | |
| Would just be. | 00:58:13 | |
| Based off of the use. | 00:58:14 | |
| If they're going to add some parking in the back. | 00:58:15 | |
| I would say that. | 00:58:18 | |
| Reasonable condition would be just a. | 00:58:20 | |
| Following uh. | 00:58:22 | |
| Code for. | 00:58:23 | |
| Waterway protection. | 00:58:26 | |
| So that requires. | 00:58:27 | |
| A property owner to work with the canal company if there's any modifications made. | 00:58:31 | |
| Within a. | 00:58:36 | |
| Canal area. So if it is an abandoned canal. | 00:58:37 | |
| Then they work that out. We have verification that that it is an abandoned canal. | 00:58:40 | |
| Then the waterway protection. | 00:58:47 | |
| Don't believe would apply in that case. | 00:58:51 | |
| Waterway protection is we're about 20 foot distance comes in. | 00:58:53 | |
| It is to protect banks. | 00:58:57 | |
| From erosion and to maintain trees. | 00:58:59 | |
| Along canals so that they remain. | 00:59:02 | |
| Have good integrity. | 00:59:07 | |
| In their bank, but. | 00:59:09 | |
| So conditions could be. | 00:59:10 | |
| Just compliance with waterway protection. | 00:59:13 | |
| And also complaints with. | 00:59:16 | |
| Tree canopy sustainability. So any trace that? | 00:59:18 | |
| Are removed. | 00:59:21 | |
| If that canal is abandoned if the waterway protection doesn't apply. | 00:59:22 | |
| If trees are removed. | 00:59:26 | |
| Then they'd have to be replaced with a mature canopy of equivalent size. | 00:59:28 | |
| Either on the property or up to 50% could be located off the property. | 00:59:34 | |
| Parking wise another option if there's not. | 00:59:39 | |
| Enough parking or a way to locate parking on site They. | 00:59:44 | |
| There's a potential to explore shared parking. | 00:59:48 | |
| Potentially with the neighboring business next door for any overflow parking if they do a shared parking agreement and that's in | 00:59:52 | |
| our. | 00:59:55 | |
| Parking standards code. | 00:59:59 | |
| So that is an option for the applicant that could just be that's. | 01:00:01 | |
| Kind of included in the general standards or conditions with just meeting the parking requirements so there's. | 01:00:06 | |
| Various ways the applicant can achieve that. | 01:00:13 | |
| And if they're going to expand the parking lot, there's already a code requiring 3 islands and those sort of things if they're | 01:00:15 | |
| going to expand the existing parking lot, right? | 01:00:19 | |
| OK. So Kerry, just to clarify for me. | 01:00:25 | |
| Didn't understand but. | 01:00:27 | |
| Is the existing parking enough for the use but the applicant wants more parking? Or in order to do this use, more parking is | 01:00:29 | |
| required? | 01:00:32 | |
| Do you have one parking spot on site or two? | 01:00:36 | |
| There's 7 stalls, 7 stalls currently. | 01:00:39 | |
| The parking is based off of the. | 01:00:42 | |
| Square footage. | 01:00:46 | |
| I believe that 7 would be. | 01:00:47 | |
| Adequate. I haven't done a full parking assessment on it. | 01:00:49 | |
| Do you know how many square feet? | 01:00:54 | |
| 25125 hundred. | 01:00:58 | |
| That sounds like 7 would be. | 01:01:01 | |
| Pretty close to what they would need. | 01:01:03 | |
| So it's so the expansion of the parking would be to accommodate. | 01:01:05 | |
| What they're anticipating, but not. | 01:01:09 | |
| We wouldn't need more. | 01:01:12 | |
| If we want to approve this because it's already right, I don't. I don't know if it needs to be that detailed. | 01:01:14 | |
| Just having the condition of meeting parking standards will take care of them. | 01:01:20 | |
| OK. | 01:01:24 | |
| Right. And a couple other questions on the. | 01:01:26 | |
| I'm going to say it wrong again. The freesia. The free. | 01:01:31 | |
| Frise, that's it. I call it exterior crown molding. Are you guys going to hold on to that? | 01:01:34 | |
| Tell us how to pronounce it too when you come up. | 01:01:43 | |
| It might be easier for me to come up to the podium. My name is Corey Solomon. Thank architecture. | 01:01:46 | |
| Here I am the architect assisting John and Victoria on the project. | 01:01:52 | |
| The overall goal is yes to maintain and repair. | 01:01:58 | |
| The freeze board that is at the soffit. | 01:02:02 | |
| At the top area, we are going to have to modify a little bit of the window trim as we make those replacements. | 01:02:05 | |
| To a new thermally broken. | 01:02:12 | |
| Windows system with the grids in it. | 01:02:16 | |
| But overall, our goal is again to maintain as much of the existing. | 01:02:18 | |
| Element that we possibly can. | 01:02:23 | |
| With the understanding that there might be parts of it that are just. | 01:02:25 | |
| So far gone that we're going to have to. | 01:02:29 | |
| Refabricate and rebuild. | 01:02:32 | |
| To make that work, but that's our overall goal, is not to remove any historical elements like that, but only to enhance them. | 01:02:36 | |
| So whatever you can't keep, you're intending to. | 01:02:42 | |
| Remake and replace. | 01:02:45 | |
| Yes we can. We can just have it remade. | 01:02:47 | |
| OK. | 01:02:49 | |
| That's just on our little checklist of items, so thank you for covering that. | 01:02:51 | |
| And and then also maybe I could why I'm standing here as well as to talk to you a little bit what the fence is going on and why | 01:02:56 | |
| we. | 01:02:59 | |
| The element. | 01:03:04 | |
| That's on your screens right there is a Roper Ogul is again to take the existing historical fence and reuse that on the two sides | 01:03:05 | |
| of the pillars. The reason why we broke that is when we wanted to create a strong. | 01:03:11 | |
| Entry marquee and element with some lanterns on top of those Piers. | 01:03:18 | |
| But also some of the fancies in really poor shape. | 01:03:23 | |
| It's rusted all the way through and so we're. | 01:03:27 | |
| Trying to account for those what we thought was the linear length of those sections that might not be able to be reusable. | 01:03:30 | |
| And to them rebuild those new entry gates that. | 01:03:35 | |
| We found it especially towards the. | 01:03:38 | |
| The north side. | 01:03:42 | |
| Of it is at the base of it's pretty rotten, so. | 01:03:44 | |
| We're going to have to really try to save some of that and work with it, but our goal is we love the fence. | 01:03:47 | |
| His wife loves the fence and we want to keep it. | 01:03:52 | |
| Just enhance it. | 01:03:54 | |
| And then while you're up here, maybe you can just answer this one. | 01:03:56 | |
| The scale of the columns that are going to be supporting that French porch. | 01:03:59 | |
| Any idea about how big those are right now? I could talk to you about the scale. They're probably about 14 by 14, very historical. | 01:04:03 | |
| And the nature and scale of those. | 01:04:10 | |
| We could probably put a conditional work with staff on those, but there will work with the proportions so they're not your little | 01:04:14 | |
| spindly. | 01:04:17 | |
| 6 by 6 that might. Our intent is their built up column. | 01:04:21 | |
| Box column with several pieces of trim and finished out. | 01:04:25 | |
| As well. And that was our. | 01:04:30 | |
| Our overall goal again too, is also. | 01:04:32 | |
| Create that long entry porch that was a little bit more historical. The original home didn't have a porch, there was one added to | 01:04:34 | |
| it later. | 01:04:38 | |
| And we actually, in looking at, we felt like this. | 01:04:42 | |
| Actually complemented the home a little bit more, but it also helped us protect that. | 01:04:46 | |
| The ramps that we are planning to add for the wheelchair accessible to accessibility to the front door. | 01:04:50 | |
| I've got a question about the columns in the depiction that we're seeing on the screen. These look like round. | 01:04:58 | |
| I'm thinking Grecian columns which is not the same as a. | 01:05:06 | |
| Box column. | 01:05:10 | |
| Oh, you know what? Actually, that was Vic. | 01:05:11 | |
| We she requested that we change them to a. | 01:05:14 | |
| Historically round column, which is also again an Eastern architecture. | 01:05:17 | |
| Element. | 01:05:22 | |
| Is it? Is it congruous with the this time period? | 01:05:23 | |
| OK, very much so. | 01:05:26 | |
| OK, OK. | 01:05:29 | |
| I think it looks nice, it's just. | 01:05:30 | |
| Is it the time? Well, quick hammer all the questions. Those are just the ones that I had literally printed and given to me. So. | 01:05:33 | |
| Yeah. Thank you for actually picking up on that. That was a last minute revision that was made a week or so ago. | 01:05:38 | |
| Stained glass. I know there's stained glass currently in the. | 01:05:44 | |
| Home and then it's not shown in the depictions. Will the stained glass stay? Yes, the the stained glass we want to keep on the | 01:05:48 | |
| House now. | 01:05:53 | |
| What we still have to work through is that those stained glass modules are going to be a little different than the new glass. | 01:05:58 | |
| So our overall goal is to. | 01:06:03 | |
| Hopefully get the window manufacturer work with us where we can reinsert that stained glass. If not, we'll. | 01:06:06 | |
| Want to reuse it on the interior of the project. | 01:06:12 | |
| Right. | 01:06:27 | |
| Well, they're pretty. | 01:06:29 | |
| Really pretty. | 01:06:30 | |
| Thank you. | 01:06:31 | |
| Other questions for the applicant. | 01:06:33 | |
| I just have a comment. | 01:06:35 | |
| While I appreciate the fact that every retailer wants maximum visibility for their storefront. | 01:06:38 | |
| Given that we are Tree City, USA, I don't think it's unreasonable. | 01:06:45 | |
| For us to include. | 01:06:50 | |
| As a condition of approval. | 01:06:52 | |
| A couple of columnar trees in the front of the pole. | 01:06:54 | |
| Property I appreciate. | 01:06:57 | |
| The aesthetic of a. | 01:07:00 | |
| Of a European garden look and I think it's really pretty, but I don't think it would be. | 01:07:03 | |
| Upset by a couple of columnar trees. | 01:07:08 | |
| You know, when you talk about a calmer tree, those are very different. Are you talking about a content? | 01:07:11 | |
| Conifer or deciduous tree? | 01:07:16 | |
| You could go. | 01:07:19 | |
| Either or really. With that you could do it. Or fruit tree or something vertical. | 01:07:20 | |
| I mean, you could do because of the power line conflict. You're not Bauer. | 01:07:25 | |
| Burying the power lines. Otherwise I'd say put in, you know, some cottonwoods and really go for the historical look. But I think | 01:07:28 | |
| you could go in there and put in a couple columnar beach, for example. | 01:07:33 | |
| They're, you know, not a whole lot wider than the columns you're talking about putting in there. And again, that green space helps | 01:07:39 | |
| soften the noise island and heat island that we have. | 01:07:43 | |
| Along the Highland corridor. | 01:07:48 | |
| Yeah. And I don't think we could that's we're not going to be opposed to something like that as long as we're complying with it. | 01:07:50 | |
| We also have a ton of trees on this site. | 01:07:54 | |
| All the way around the North. | 01:08:00 | |
| Side, the South side and the east side so. | 01:08:01 | |
| Keep something that's really clean. But we could definitely investigate some calamari trees without hopefully disrupting it too | 01:08:06 | |
| much. And that might actually be a nice little moment we could, you know, light them. | 01:08:11 | |
| As well And it could be a nice Christmas element as well. And the motion we can call out medium columnar trees and then that gives | 01:08:16 | |
| you some latitude to work with and. | 01:08:20 | |
| Yeah. Are you tied to calm or would you also be open to like a? | 01:08:25 | |
| Flowering, small scale like decorative. | 01:08:31 | |
| Type tree. | 01:08:33 | |
| Accent type tree. | 01:08:35 | |
| Sure, that's right. So there's like a dog would or something alive. | 01:08:37 | |
| So rather than call them or just call out small to medium tree. | 01:08:43 | |
| Yeah, OK. | 01:08:47 | |
| We can do that in the motion, almost, almost artistic. | 01:08:49 | |
| Looking for, you know. | 01:08:54 | |
| Perfect. | 01:08:56 | |
| It suggests all right. Any other questions for the applicant? | 01:08:57 | |
| All right, we'll go ahead and have you guys sit down. | 01:09:01 | |
| And then this is a public hearing, so we'll go ahead and open up the public hearing on this. If there's anyone members from the | 01:09:03 | |
| public that want to speak on this tonight, I don't see anyone other than the applicant present. | 01:09:09 | |
| Unless we have the other applicants who are interested in. | 01:09:14 | |
| So with that, we'll go 123 and close the public hearing. And then Commissioners, any discussion points? | 01:09:17 | |
| That we want to touch on before a motion made on this one. | 01:09:24 | |
| I just think that the use is really reasonable in terms of intensity. | 01:09:28 | |
| And the the suggested modifications to the. | 01:09:33 | |
| Structure I think are. | 01:09:36 | |
| You know, in line with the. | 01:09:38 | |
| The historic look. | 01:09:39 | |
| And and feel of the property and I think I appreciate that the applicant is really being thoughtful about, not just. | 01:09:40 | |
| Replicating a look but preserving some of the actual elements? That's nice. Absolutely. | 01:09:47 | |
| And I'm glad it was designated historical. | 01:09:52 | |
| It's cool. | 01:09:55 | |
| We need more of that. | 01:09:56 | |
| So. But I do agree with you, Commissioner Font on the. | 01:09:57 | |
| You know, putting in a couple smaller trees. | 01:10:02 | |
| Definitely because. | 01:10:04 | |
| Again, if they didn't have the power line conflict, I'd be a bully about it, but. | 01:10:06 | |
| I don't see anything really. | 01:10:11 | |
| Being big. | 01:10:13 | |
| Viable with those power lines unless you just want to see what half a tree looks like growing up against a house. | 01:10:14 | |
| I agree. So with that I. | 01:10:21 | |
| I'm happy to entertain anyone that wants to make a motion. | 01:10:25 | |
| Or I'll make the motion. | 01:10:30 | |
| All right, I'll go for it. | 01:10:33 | |
| See if I can get this right. | 01:10:34 | |
| Because I got pages of stuff here, OK. | 01:10:36 | |
| So, umm. | 01:10:39 | |
| I motion the Holiday Planning Commission moved to approve. | 01:10:40 | |
| The application for a conditional use permit for a historic site modification. | 01:10:43 | |
| And for use as a jewelry shop for the David McDonald House. | 01:10:48 | |
| Designated as a historic site by Section 13.86, Point 02 of the City. | 01:10:52 | |
| Of holiday. | 01:10:59 | |
| Code located at 4659 S Highland Drive. | 01:11:00 | |
| Based upon the findings that the application. | 01:11:04 | |
| Meets the suggested findings within the packet. | 01:11:08 | |
| And additionally that. | 01:11:11 | |
| They retain and reuse the fence, as they've outlined in their presentation today. | 01:11:14 | |
| And that they also. | 01:11:20 | |
| Put in two. | 01:11:21 | |
| Small to medium trees that will work with the landscaping in front of the home. | 01:11:23 | |
| We probably ought to strike #4 and just have them comply with the ordinance. | 01:11:30 | |
| What's that? | 01:11:35 | |
| #4 on the. | 01:11:36 | |
| Conditions of approval. | 01:11:37 | |
| With the canal, strike that and just require him to. | 01:11:40 | |
| What do you call it? The water maintenance water. | 01:11:43 | |
| Preservation. | 01:11:46 | |
| OK. And then? | 01:11:48 | |
| OK, so opponent Commissioner Ken Hams amend that motion to also have the. | 01:11:50 | |
| Umm City compliant to the canal on the east side of the property. | 01:11:58 | |
| And or any additional parking be compliant with. | 01:12:03 | |
| City code standards. | 01:12:07 | |
| Commissioner Font second. | 01:12:10 | |
| All right, you have a second. We'll come down here. | 01:12:12 | |
| Commissioner Baron. | 01:12:14 | |
| Aye, Mr. Gong, I, Commissioner Prince, Aye, Commissioner full. | 01:12:15 | |
| Aye, Mr. Cunningham. Aye. And Chair Roche votes aye. | 01:12:18 | |
| So we look forward to see that progress. Thank you very much. | 01:12:22 | |
| All right. | 01:12:26 | |
| Can we request? | 01:12:28 | |
| We will now 3 minute for a quick three minute recess and be right back. | 01:12:30 |